Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCAs returning CCA requests!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5931 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have not seen the following issue on the forum and I am wondering if this is a new tactic by the DCAs and thought I would start a thread on how this practice should be combated.

 

I have had my £1 and CCA request returned from different DCAs, they claim they have closed the account and passed the info back to the OC.

 

My tactic is just to allow the clock to tick and at the end of 30 days write to them informing them they are now committing a criminal offence. I feel its their choice to act in the way they have - however the law is the law and they know they they have been CCA'd and they know what they have to do. If they do not wish to keep the £1 then thats their look out.

 

Anyone else getting this response and what has / will be your response?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally would just wait and see what happens. It may be a sign that there is no credit agreement. If you then hear from another DCA, you can write and tell them the account is in dispute with the former DCA and they are in breach of the Consumer Credit Act trying to pursue it. It can be passed around a few times before it finally disappears off the face of the earth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been giving this some thought recently.

 

My understanding is that where a CCA request is made to a DCA who is acting as an agent for the OC, they are under an obligation to pass the request to the OC. The request remains valid, in my view, even if the DCA close their file - which I suspect they do in cases where they are on a small fee, so if anything other than a spot of light intimidation is required, they'll give up.

 

The £1 fee is the maximum that can be charged, but a DCA or OC doesn't have to charge anything at all. Therefore, the return of the fee does not mean that the request is invalidated or ended, though this would seem to be the implication of DCAs - they seem to think that if they decide that they are no longer acting for the OC, they don't have any responsibility for a CCA request.

 

It may, therefore, be worth including a short paragraph in CCA letters to DCAs, along these lines:

 

In the event that you decide to close your file and return the account to your client, you are reminded that as this formal request was made whilst you were acting for your client, you are still obliged to pass it to them.

 

I agree, however, that 'returning file' syndrome is indicative of a lack of a valid agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt has been returned to the original OC, then would it not be prudent to CCA the OC?

 

 

Indeed, but by making a CCA to the DCA, this is effectively what one is doing, since the DCA acts as an agent of the OC.

 

When a DCA returns the file, the OC's usual course of action is to pass the account to another DCA, and so it goes on. Insisting that the CCA request is passed on may also be useful if it goes to court, when it can be shown that OC and its agents failed to comply with the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been giving this some thought recently.

 

My understanding is that where a CCA request is made to a DCA who is acting as an agent for the OC, they are under an obligation to pass the request to the OC. The request remains valid, in my view, even if the DCA close their file - which I suspect they do in cases where they are on a small fee, so if anything other than a spot of light intimidation is required, they'll give up.

 

The £1 fee is the maximum that can be charged, but a DCA or OC doesn't have to charge anything at all. Therefore, the return of the fee does not mean that the request is invalidated or ended, though this would seem to be the implication of DCAs - they seem to think that if they decide that they are no longer acting for the OC, they don't have any responsibility for a CCA request.

 

It may, therefore, be worth including a short paragraph in CCA letters to DCAs, along these lines:

 

 

 

I agree, however, that 'returning file' syndrome is indicative of a lack of a valid agreement.

 

This is how I have read this issue and why I shall be waiting till the 12+2, then 30 days have passed and I will be reporting them immediately to Trading Standards - as they(as i read things) will then be committing a Criminal Offence.

 

A side issue from this is the fact that I have previously CCA Kays direct http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/131318-kays-cca-request.html?highlight=kays , but surprise, surprise the assigned it to a debt collecter the day just before they received my request. However, I had already CCA'd another DCA in regards the very same account the week before so they should not have passed it on to another DCA. Again I will just sit tight until the 30 days are up. Of course I could be wrong and they can assign a debt before the 12+2 days have passed?

 

Cheers

RFC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I had similar from barclayhard sent the cca request, unsigned of course. they sent letter aftyer they cashed the £1 stating that as I had not signe dthey do not need to supply, needless to say they are in full default now, and as I have moved i wonder if theyll wait 6 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Can anyone advise me on finding a template for getting account transferral to a DCA removed from OH's credit record? I CCA'd Debt Managers (or Morons as we call them) and they were unable to supply an enforcable agreement. Just out of principle we want to get the information removed from his C.R. Thanks in advance and sorry if this is the wrong place, I'm 29 weeks pregnant and very fuzzy in the head.

 

Cheers:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had this from Aktiv kapital/thames, sent back the Postal order stating them and their client no longer wished to persue the debt and the account was cleared. Basically "we aint got proof you owe us plus its statute barred and you know too much for your own good about how we work so we might aswell admit defeat"!:p

 

Its stored in a safe place waiting for the next **** whos been sold it for pennies!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the same myself from connaught after i cca'd them in Jan. Got the letter saying files closed and returned to oc, also returned the po.

 

hey presto exactly as SP says its been passed to a new dca now:o

 

Thanks to SP a letter was sent today stating whats been said above about account in dispute etc.

 

cm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...