Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please accept my apologies for the delayed update, but i have been trawling through emails for supporting evidence, you see we are in the consultation phase and there will be three meetings during the process. So as i have said  my role is at risk due to the scoring and mine being low. As explained i never received my report as my line manager left during December and i was on leave. So i was not afforded any meeting, i received no feedback at all, so how am i meant to know any areas to improve or to attain a higher grade. So with this in mind i gathered my supporting evidence, i found the email from my then line manager and the objectives that he set out and we agreed.   I then supplied 20 emails that  showed that not only did i reach the targets, i smashed them, highlighting areas that i had saved the company a considerable amount of money, idented issues  implemented process and solutions with ongoing support. All emails are verified and prove that i should have received the highest possible grade going by their criteria. I also included the email from HR when i challenged  the score and they replied with " the outgoing manager supplied thorough feedback to the incoming interim manager who should have provided this (this was never received, and report i received was blank with just a score. Highlighted was the email from HR stating " a two is not a concerning grade"  well clearly it is as less than a month later it is what was used to decide i was at risk. I have supplied this information to the line manager and the external HR rep that was on the call as i have 48 hours to supply this. Had i had a proper and fair review like everyone else had then i would have been able to provide this evidence when he issued the score, he could not argue with the sheer volume of evidence that i had. This proves what was said to me when i took this position, " there was some politics in me getting the role, their line manager had promised the role to one of his guys, they cant really do anything but watch your back" He should not have promised this anyway as two interviews were required in the process *which i sat) so i earned the right to the role. This was because the three of them knew there was a lot that would be uncovered and they wanted it covering, i started to see this after two weeks, had i not said anything then it would have looked as though i was incompetent or stupid. I did try to work with them on this to remedy but sadly they went the other rout instead.    
    • He'll be asking Truss for advice and help next ... or maybe go straight to a lettuce He already asked Swella How do you survive all those breaches of ministerial code etc She is rumored to have replied - dunno - if the positions were reversed, I'd have sacked me in without a seconds thought
    • Dear Stu. I have been very annoyed that they put this fee on my account right now, as you said the court might rule that i have to pay it further on. This sounds like a dodgy practice. Below is what the account manager sent to me when i asked her why this was getting added to my account right now. Is this legal what they are doing i.e. pre-empting the judges decision it seems. 'Thank you for the email.  The court fees have been added to your account as you have not vacated the property. If the court decide that the landlord is not able to recoup the costs, we would remove the charge from your account.  At present, the court costs have not been deducted from the payment you made towards the rent.'
    • Yay!! Plan to submit tomorrow. Thanks for all the support. I'm so out of my comfort zone. Will keep thread updated and continue reading. Just want them gone!   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

barclays ruined us


pmml05
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2918 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Barclays effectively caused the closure of our limited company after 6 years

with a turn over of £350k p.a. by, closing all linked accounts.

 

despite many appeals from our local business managers

the decision was out of their hands and head office proceeded

this action although the conciqueces were quite clear.

 

Apart from having years of countless charges that we can possibly chase,

this action financially ruined both directors personally,

 

 

I personally banked with barclays for years never once was overdrawn

but as all linked accounts were closed

this also incorporated my own,

everything I had was with them.

 

Barclaycard , all credit cards were barclays bank, loans and account overdrafts were all 'called in' at the same time.

 

the effects were devistating.

to the tune of approx: £54k

and no job because of it. fortunately we are now working again.

 

it had been a battle via CCCS,

all creditors (all barclays linked) have agreed on minimum payments,

except barlaycard who following many many threats of legal action,

held out as did I but have managed to still notch up yet another £2k+ in interest and charges

before finally freezing it. and still didn't go legal accepted a slightly higher minimun payment.

 

We have been advised by a few people to take legal action against barclays.

How likely is it that we could win this?

or get anywhere.

 

We do feel that we have good grounds and have good documented evidence.

Barclays blatently ignored our experts reports on the health and company

and potential submitted to them prior to closing the accounts.

in fact they didn't even reply to our letters or appeals via the local business advisors.

 

Due to circumstances caused by events at the time we were unable to obtain another account and our hands were tied

 

What would be the best course of action that you can reccommend or is it not worth it.

 

To be Honest we have nothing to lose by taking action.

 

look forward to seeng any replies

 

Pmml

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome. You are able to claim from closed accounts, although you will probably be asked to prove your ID. Hopefully you still have all account details and can send your DPA request if necessary.

 

You may not be able to claim the charges with respect to the Limited company account as these charges were probably itemised, and not penalty charges of the usual manner.

 

Read around the forums thoroughly, the FAQ's and libraries, then start your thread for your claim in the Barclays forum so that we can all follow your course of action, answer your questions there and give general advice.

 

Good luck, and please pop into the Bear Garden once in a while.

Vamp.:)

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays effectively caused the closure of our limited company after years of trading with a turn over of £350,000.00+ p.a. by, closing all linked accounts.

 

Including the main trading account that was not overdrawn, had no liabilities as there were little facilities on the account and also was joint with my business partner, this account the local business managers did not wish to lose either.

 

Despite many appeals from our local business managers the decision was out of their hands and head office proceeded this action although the conciqueces were quite clear.

 

Apart from having years of countless charges that we can possibly chase,

 

This action financially ruined both directors personally, I personally banked with barclays for years never once was overdrawn but as all linked accounts were closed this also incorporated my own, everything I had was with them.

Barclaycard , all credit cards were barclays bank, loans and account overdrafts were all 'called in' at the same time.

 

the effects were devistating.

to the tune of approx: £54,000.

and no job because of it. fortunately we are now working again.

it had been a battle via CCCS,

all creditors (all barclays linked) have agreed on minimum payments, except barlaycard who following many many threats of legal action, held out as did I but have managed to still notch up yet another £2000.00+ on a £5000 + balance in interest and charges before finally freezing it. and still they didn't go legal as they threatened many times but accepted a slightly higher minimun payment for another 6 months. of £10 pm.

 

We have been advised by a few people to take legal action against barclays.

How likely is it that we could win this?

or get anywhere.

We do feel that we have good grounds and have good documented evidence.

Barclays blatently ignored our experts reports on the health and company and potential submitted to them prior to closing the accounts.

In fact they didn't even reply to our letters or appeals via the local business advisors.

Due to circumstances caused by events at the time we were unable to obtain another account and our hands were tied. now with every account defaulted.

our personal credit is ruined.

We do believe that barclays had a full overview of the consequences closing the accounts. but they did it anyway.

in principal they have caused all of the problems that have followed.

 

What would be the best course of action that you can reccommend or is it not worth it.

 

To be Honest we have nothing to lose by taking action.

 

look forward to seeng any replies

 

Pmml

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the current status of the limited company? Does it still exist?

 

You wouldn't be able to raise a claim in a personal capacity as the charges weren't applied to your account, they were applied to the limited company. Only the limited company could start action against the bank.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your reply.

 

the company is still active but insolvent, so yes we could still put in a claim against them and i presume for lost business as a result and cause for the demise finally.

 

as all of the linked accounts, were mine personally as the business advisors gave me personal loads to help the company out with promises of transfering them to the compnay, it was only on attempting this they decided to close all linked accounts.

 

which caused the damage.

 

they did have a full financial overvieew.

 

and everything was managed prior, yes we had a few debts but they were managed fine.

 

but they did 'crucify us when they decided to make the decision and we couldn't do a thing.

i

f you can suggest anything it would be gratefully accepted

 

Pmml

Link to post
Share on other sites

So were the charges actually applied to the business account or the 'linked' personal accounts?

 

Can you also clarify what you mean by 'linked' - the company is a seperate legal entity, so as far as I am aware they should not be linked in any way.

 

If the charges were all applied to the business account - yes the company will be able to claim them back but I assume as it is insolvent the company's affairs are being dealt with by an insolvency practicioner or official receiver? If so any successful claim would go to them in the first instance.

 

As for loss of business etc you would have to prove that this was caused purely by the unlawful charges - if you had other debts/financial difficulties not telated to the charges then it would be difficult to prove.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and I think your general question really is out of the realm of this forum, being a group of people with little or no legal expertise.

Sounds like you need professional legal or accounting advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks fore the attempted help responses, in answer to the one question raised.

 

yes Barclays, tied the totally independent Limited company account in with the 6 other accounts that I had.

 

I may add that this account also had another signatory, who was also separate.

was not overdrawn or run badly.

 

my personal accounts had never been overdrawn and all loans etc were serviced and had no bad history. except one they had overlooked that was pretty much disused that was overdrawn for 10 months and to be honest neither us or barclays noticed it until the time whereby they decided to close all 'linked'

accounts, and this included the limited compny accout.

 

an independent finacial advisor wrote a report and along with the local business managers could not see why they should close this account.

despite appeals/ from both the company and advisors on our behalf, barclays didn't even comment and when the date set arrived. they closed the accounts.

 

due to circumstances we were unable to get another account, in the mean time forced to operate a COD basis only which crippled our business. and payments due etc..

the company did not have a great deal of debt however the continuance was made impossible by the banks decision and the timescale in effect killed us..

 

yes there are charges obviously on both business and personal levels but these actions by barclays to close an independent entity account, caused us to lose our main source of income at the time and everything else that followed..

 

I have no idea if this is a fightable case and if we were to come up with a claim against the bank what stance they would have on it.

 

We believe the bank acted irresponsibly, having the total finacial overview that they had they would have known the results of this action.

 

it was made clear to them before hand an there was no mercy.. in fact very little if no response...

 

Pmml.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are going to have to be quite clinical in deciding what can be claimed and what is going to be impractical.

 

Firstly, you imply that you think you have a claim against Barclays for closing all the accounts due to "forseeable" consequences. That will be difficult to prove as they will claim they acted on banking grounds as per their terms etc. Unless you are very skilled in the law you will need a solicitor and its difficult to find a good one and even harder to afford them. I imagine to mount such a case would easily involve a five figure sum. From your postings I doubt that this one has legs.

 

However, what may change this overview is if the level of charges we all contend are illegal caused the account situation which led to the account closures. So you need to concentrate on calculating the six years charges as described in the FAQ's on here and getting those back. When you succeed on this, you must bear in mind that your refunds will go into the account on which the charges were incurred so will be offset by any overdraft on that, or associated, account.

 

If you have control of the limited company (ie its not in liquidation) then you can reclaim the charges as a director on the company's behalf. Again, any refunds will go into the company account.

 

Your situation sounds quite complicated in that there are various accounts, personal and company, as well as different signatories. I presume you had issued a personal guarantee to the bank on the company account and they may be relying on that association to the linking of accounts to which you object. If they called upon you to pay up as guarantor, there may be a term in the guarantee document allowing them to dip their hand in your other accounts. If there is no such link then their action in the linking may be questionable.

 

You need to be hard-headed and practical - do not let your anger influence your actions. The truth is you probably need legal help which you almost certainly can't afford unless you can get legal aid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for that , and yes the key is to tread very carfully to find the correct angle of approach regarding the grounds for the action.

 

no we had no gurantees to the bank everythig was unsecured.

 

yes even with a signatory and a clear legal separation they still placed the company account under the same 'linked accounts'

 

this does seem to be the key to this and as a result the damage that followed.

bare in mind this account had no liability for barclays to leave alone.

 

I do believe that they had initiated an exit strategi on me and this fell under the the same umberella. so therefore i have decided to isue DPA letters on all accounts and look at three separate cases, 1 the company action. 2. my personal action . and 3. my partners action and see what light it throws up.

as there was a lot of internal meetings re: this account and due to barclays silence we could never find out why..

 

I do belive if this was put before a judge even on a minor count that the overall blame may actually fall on barclays. certainely for my personal situation, as everthing i had was with or connected to them. barclycard monument sky etc..

 

I would have at least thought that there are grounds for irresponsible lending practices..at least however none of the above defaulted accounts are taking any further action. they have all accepted min payment offers to date, we shall see what the DPA revieves I suppose and then think of the best way to take it further..

 

Pmml

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that the careful and thorough approach you are adopting is the best course of action.

 

It does seem a slightly odd case - like a jigsaw with a missing piece or two.

 

I would still put the idea of seeking damages for "ruining" you at the very back of your list of things to be on this case as it will, in my opinion, be very difficult and expensive to prove.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vamp,

 

Excellent site, thanks for your help.

 

I wrote my data protection letter to Barclays and got confirmation they will send my statements for my personal accounts however I also asked for the same for our Limited company. They replied stating thet the DPA does not cover requests for information held on limited companies.

 

Is this correct? I'm not sure I understood your reply above.

 

Many Thanks,

 

Grazel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is correct - there's a different letter for a business claim in the templates area.

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably a good time to start a thread in the Barclays forum for best advice and support.

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

Nearly 10 years ago Barclays closed all linked accounts personal and business leaving all debt payable immediately.

no offers to resolve or agreements following just all due immediately..

 

No one has ever taken me to court,

all sent to various DCAs

all set up minimum plans and I have left it that way.

 

 

we are taking 45k debt here, killed my credit capacity at the time, all unsecured.

 

Its time I now took action to get rid of these as Barclays have just re-submitted some of the various to the same DCA.

. so now in one place.. for about 26k

 

What would you suggest,

 

 

I've never been in a situation to be able to take them to court as it wold cost me too much to do.

or so ive always thought

any advise Please

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might find it better to start a thread of your own. This is an information thread and will probably not be responded to.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

merged with your existing threads from 2006 when it happened

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...