Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tenant being threatened with court over garden


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine has been told by the council (well, its a housing association) to get his garden sorted or he will be taken to court and possibly evicted.

 

The garden is a bit of a mess - hedges are overgrown and so is grass. However, he has had an injury at work and was struggling to get it done before the deadline (problem as well is that is has been near constantly raining, making it rather difficult to do the garden).

 

He knows it needs doing and that it should have been done, but it seems the council are being a bit uncooperative with him. He got most of it done but his trimmer packed in and he's trying to get it sorted.

 

In the meantime, is the council able to actually take him to court? If so is he liable to be evicted over a garden? Looking at all the other problems in the area, I'd have thought an overgrown hedge would be the least of the council's concerns!:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that seems a bit harsh,how on earth do they expect someone to do the garden in this weather???

Could he not write to them and explain about the injury,and ask for more time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your friend is a housing association tenant, he may have been issued with a tenancy agreement (TA). In your friend's TA there should be a clause with regards to upkeep of the garden. If there is one and it has not been fulfilled by your friend, the landlord (housing assoc.) may get frustrated but this would usually not be a ground for eviction. The condition of the garden would have to be truly awful. I wonder therefore if there are any other issues that we are not aware of.

If there is however a distinct threat of legal action, your friend needs to speak to specialist adviser or seek advice from Shelter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/residential-commercial-lettings/118005-great-links-housing-associated.html#post1196695

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Joa. However, I would advise that he now looks to get the garden sorted as a matter of highest priority - it is clear that the HA mean business - even if they cannot evict right now due to it, it might mean that they will evict when they can(the end of the fixed term for example), so either way it is vital he sorts it ASAP. And as stated above, the condition of the garden must be awful for it to have gotten to this stage...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in my own opinion its not really that bad, but I have been shown the letter which was sent to him which says something about an unkempt garden making the whole area look bad. I've promised this person that i would try and come round if the HA makes another call. He knows that the gardens untidy and he is trying to sort it out. I think the HA is also having a go about litter in the hedges - which is entirely down to people passing by using his garden as a rubbish tip (its a couple of cans of lager, the odd bag of crisp and the likes). Think I'll be suggesting that the HA get its priorities right.

 

If they complained about the state of my garden (a bit tatty but otherwise OK) they'd get an earful on noisy neighbours, a house 2 doors down with a garden full of dumped furniture, the guy opposite with a security light shining through my window, next door having constant arguments (as well as the drugs use that goes on), vibrations in house every time a bus goes past..... ooh I could go on!

 

He does have an agreement which states that the garden must be kept tidy. He knows it should not have got into the state it is in, but its pretty damned difficulty to do in winter! Also there seems to have been some intimation about criminal proceedings - surely to god this is a civil matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get in touch with the charitable organisations. They can arrange for volunteers to come and do it for you, also there are the people who the courts award 'community service' to, they do a lot of this sort of work.

 

I am not sure where you will find the communtiy services supervisors, but you could ring the courts and ask them where these people are farmed out to after they are sentenced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm - didn't think of that. Not too sure if he wants a bunch of crims in his garden though! Do they only do it for certain people - the elderly or disabled for example, or can anyone ask?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...