Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I've been Lowelled


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5911 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A month or so ago I had a telephone call from someone asking me if I'd lived at a previous address they gave. Being a bit flustered at the time and in the middle of some tricksy work stuff I didn't have my wits about me to enquire why a total stranger was ringing me up asking personal questions. As it was, I hadn't ever lived at the address stated (or even in the county stated!) and relayed that info and ended the call.

 

Didn't think anything more of it until a letter from Lowell Portfolio hit asking me to get in touch to 'update' my address details. I gave that the attention I felt it deserved and filed it in the bin.

 

Now it gets interesting. I'm signed up to a service which sends me an alert if there's any change in my credit file. I received such an alert and on checking my file with experian saw that I'd been searched by a debt collection agency I'd never heard of.

 

Today I received 2 letters from Lowell Portfolio asking for repayment of 2 separate Barclaycard debts totalling nearly £4,000 between them. This came as somewhat of a surprise to me since the only Barclaycard I've ever owned I still have in my possession and it has a balance of ZERO.

 

It would seem that Lowell have done a search on me (my credit report is clean). Now I was under the impression that this was unlawful unless I've given permission to do so.

 

Naturally I'm going to fire off the standard template letter to these bottom feeders demanding to see the CCA but after doing some research on these idiots I feel that the situation really warrants something more than simply sticking my ground and demanding my statutory rights.

 

So....is there any precidence or basis for going after them for compensation should they fail to provide the relevant CCA on request (which they won't be able to do as they have either invented the debt or got the wrong person)? I would prefer to hit these mouth breathers where it obviously hurts them - the wallet. If they follow the path with me that they seem to be following with other people I've read on here and in other places, would I have a case to sue them for harassment?

 

I'd really love to turn the tables and go after the bar stewards for some of THEIR money. Failing that I'll post copies of their letters with their server IPs, along with a good sob story on to the messageboard of every data packeting script kiddie I know of who, in my experience, love a good tale of social injustice as it gives them an excuse to do what they love.

 

I'm guessing [edited] like Lowells and all their various in-house incarnations must be raking it on from the poor souls who don't know better and cave in under the harassment. That thought alone makes me want to hurt these *$"£"(*£ in every legal way at my disposal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And report them to the Office of Fair Trading - this will help to get their consumer credit licence taken away.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to CCA this lot - waste of a squid - but send them the prove it letter and tell them no further correspondence until they do. Ask them for their complaints procedure and tell them to remove your telelphone numbers from their database.

 

Failure to comply with complaint procedure request lets get straight to the Financial Services Ombudsman (FOS). Failure to comply with a complaint procedure request can be added to their other failings.

 

Failure to comply with your request to remove phone numbers is a matter for the Info Commissioner (misuse of data), the telecomms regulator (misuse of telephone system) and possibly even the police (criminal harrassment)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to CCA this lot - waste of a squid - but send them the prove it letter and tell them no further correspondence until they do. Ask them for their complaints procedure and tell them to remove your telelphone numbers from their database.

 

Failure to comply with complaint procedure request lets get straight to the Financial Services Ombudsman (FOS). Failure to comply with a complaint procedure request can be added to their other failings.

 

Failure to comply with your request to remove phone numbers is a matter for the Info Commissioner (misuse of data), the telecomms regulator (misuse of telephone system) and possibly even the police (criminal harrassment)

 

Ahhh good idea. I don't want to waste £1 on these idiots for something I know for a gold-plated, sure-fired, oven-ready certainty they don't have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its better to send them the Statute Barred letter. This leaves them in NO DOUBT. It also puts the burden of proof on them PLUS :D It leaves them open to a complaint to the OFT for breaching the OFT Guidelines if they continue to press for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

That must be a new word for the dictionaries.

 

To Lowell someone could allegedly mean To behave as if you have a legal right to enforce a Statute Barred Debt. e.g. They did a Lowell on me about that 22 yr old Barclaycard debt that I havent acknowledged in the past 16 yrs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got yet another one from them today for a different amount with a different ref and i know one of them isn't mine!!!!!
But you have probably a similar sounding name to someone Lowells think may owe them money and their highly sphisticated system has selected you to be its next victim. Just pay up. Lowells dont make mistakes. They are a very professional outfit. Well it must be true its on their website.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, thinking back, the two debts which I was 'Lowelled' over went the distance very quickly - in fact Lowells 'handed in their resignation' within days after the deadline for my CCA requests had passed. So they must be aware how 'vulnerable' their position is and ready to act to protect their reputation if someone fights back.

 

What worries me is the people who don't retaliate and who have been forced to pay unenforceable and statute barred debts.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

If [edited] like Lowells and all their various in-house incarnations are raking it on from the poor souls who don't know better and cave in under the harassment then I want some of the action!Why dont WE form a company? We can then collect debts and pay OUR debts off. Sensible really!Mr Sensible

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
I think its better to send them the Statute Barred letter. This leaves them in NO DOUBT. It also puts the burden of proof on them PLUS :D It leaves them open to a complaint to the OFT for breaching the OFT Guidelines if they continue to press for payment

 

I had a debit with Barclaycard and as far as i was concerned it was paid of in about 1997!! I received a letter last year, followed all the advise about it being statute barred and after receiving multiple calls actualy spoke to a "human" who told me that this would be the end of the matter and it was considered closed

 

Two weeks ago the saga started again from ANOTHER COMPANY! except they werent so freindly -the more annoyed i got the more aggressive they got. Comments along the lines of "I dont care if the Statute stops us taking you to court, there is nothin preventing us phoning or writing to you everyday if we want". As it happens I havent heard anything more yet but since last time it took 9 months i cant be certain thats the end of it.

 

 

. So if i threaten them under the Harrasments act and say its statute barred should i go back to Barclaycard? My only concern would be re-opening communications with them might give them grounds to overturn the Statute of limitations act??:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing...

LOWELLS-Stat Demand Set Aside-No CCA & Statute Barred-£1800-Gone Away-April 2008

 

Scotcall on behalf of Cabot-£2200-no CCA returned to Cabot-file closed-March 2009

 

Cabot-Court Claim issued despite no CCA and Stat Barred-Claim discontinued-March 2009

__________________________________________

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you cannot overturn the limitation by telling them to get lost. It probably won't stop some other bottom feeder buying the debt for 50p when you are claiming your old age pension, and trying it on yet again. I am waiting for my unenforceable debts to reappear under a new identity, but this time I am ready for them.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a debit with Barclaycard and as far as i was concerned it was paid of in about 1997!! I received a letter last year, followed all the advise about it being statute barred and after receiving multiple calls actualy spoke to a "human" who told me that this would be the end of the matter and it was considered closed

 

Two weeks ago the saga started again from ANOTHER COMPANY! except they werent so freindly -the more annoyed i got the more aggressive they got. Comments along the lines of "I dont care if the Statute stops us taking you to court, there is nothin preventing us phoning or writing to you everyday if we want". As it happens I havent heard anything more yet but since last time it took 9 months i cant be certain thats the end of it.

 

 

. So if i threaten them under the Harrasments act and say its statute barred should i go back to Barclaycard? My only concern would be re-opening communications with them might give them grounds to overturn the Statute of limitations act??:evil:

Tell the idiots the debt is Statute Barred. If they continue to pursue it make an Official Complaint to them, TS, the OFT and your MP

Link to post
Share on other sites

That must be a new word for the dictionaries.

 

To Lowell someone could allegedly mean To behave as if you have a legal right to enforce a Statute Barred Debt. e.g. They did a Lowell on me about that 22 yr old Barclaycard debt that I havent acknowledged in the past 16 yrs.

 

Sorry, I know its off topic, but that really made me laugh :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...