Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Close Premium Finance - Another consumer complaint!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4043 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a default charge which i begrudgingly paid. Then I changed the direct debit date and they took it out 2 weeks later than they said they would and I incurred bank charges. So I requested that seeing as they had messed up this time, as a 'goodwill gesture' will they refund the previous charge they saw fit to make. They only agreed to refund 50% of it which I argued and was then told I had to write in (email was no longer ok!). So I sent my letter of complaint (and also emailed a copy) and 5 weeks later I still havent received a response. I've just sent another email with another copy of the letter.

 

I have email evidence of all communications. I specifically emailed them to confirm the direct debit was ok and that it would leave my account on the date I requested and they replied back saying it was all set up. Since all my payments are set to go out on the same day, 2 weeks later i assumed i was up to date and withdrew a few quid from my bank account. On the same day CPF took the direct debit payment and my account went overdrawn.

 

I'm watching another Close Premium Finance thread where the member is taking them to court. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/insurance-assurance-companies/98265-close-premium-finance-help-6.html :(

Abbey National

Approx £250 bank charges refunded by Abbey National

Close Premium Finance

£30 refund of default payments refunded after they messed up a DD

 

United Utilities

£25 compensation from United Utilities for a stream of errors on my account. Started in November and still awaiting closure and cheque in May 2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they have not replied to your complaint send another letter (recorded delivery) asking for a full and satifactory response giving them 14 days to reply. Let them know if they havn't replied within the time specified you would be making an official complaint to the FSA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. That last email i sent got a response. they told me they were refunding the rest of that previous charge straight into my account.

 

The cost they must incur dealing with complaints eh? they charge £30 when someone defaults on a payment which is dealt with automatically. so how much do you think it will cost to manually read and respond to 5-6 emails and letters? has to be into the hundreds if that £30 is realistic (which is highly unlikely)

 

Still no apology either. What does it take to say "sorry for the mistake and all the extra effort we forced you to make"?

 

I'm going to contact them again and complain about the way they have dealt with it and for an apology. They can incur incur further 'costs' dealing with another complaint and I WILL get my apology. These people need to change their attitude and learn that they are the provider and I am the customer.

Abbey National

Approx £250 bank charges refunded by Abbey National

Close Premium Finance

£30 refund of default payments refunded after they messed up a DD

 

United Utilities

£25 compensation from United Utilities for a stream of errors on my account. Started in November and still awaiting closure and cheque in May 2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

I have had trouble with these people also - £12 charge for not sending in paperwork Beware of Close Premium Finance £12 [problem] charge.

Most people who take out online insurance never expect to have to send something back in the post and certainly do not expect to be charged £12 for not sending something back in 14 days. What a [problem]! Close Premium Finance have all your banking details to take the monthly payments but will still hit you with a charge if you fail to send some paperwork back that is hidden amongst the mass of stuff they send out. BEWARE of Close PremiumFinance £12 [problem] charges. They must make a fortune from people who do not expect to post anything when they complete online!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This company is the WORST,I have car insurance through Renew with Close Premuim Finance.For over a year everything was fine then a problem with the bank went a DD payment did not through.I contacted both of them.I explained it was a problem with the bank and funds were there but they were still adament about doubling my £30 charge.After checking my Renew paperwork they confirmed there was a mistake as it read there was only a £20 charge.There are so many things wrong here.Firstly no consumer should be dealing with two serperate companies,everything should be in house with one company.I know that brokers have been around for years.As I can prove the fault was with the bank they are both at fault to not allow a simple payment by cheque or over the phone.They refuse to take a £30 or £50(the missed payment plus the fee)I am willing to pay.

I am now with another insurer,I have cancelled my DD,my Renew policy but it is like they are in a fantasy world by sending me a demand for £245 and insisting I am still insured with them with the standard threats(you know you are breaking the law if you drive without insurance)maybe they think they are talking to idiots.I have sent a formal complaint.I know they will play all sorts of games and not reply.I am prepared to take them to court and will formally complain to the FSA.I had previously warned them both not to engineer and pluck figures from the sky and try to hold me ransom.I am not taking any nonsense from either one of them.I see on this site that genuine people are having a lot of problems with them.Close Premium Finance in particulary treat the public with comtempt,I look forward to the day Close premium Finance are no more.Renew try with smile but are still insistant.I am sure there are some good companies out there but the market seems to contain many of apparent problem companies who are out to make as much money as possible and engineer situations and stress genuine innocent people.I have been driving for more than 20 years and in the last 2 years have had 2 such situations as this.I know they have to make money but they are looking to take advantage.They deserve all the bad reviews and there should be tighter regulations and new legislation to stop themThe usual in the UK,everything seems to take years and MPs,MSPs seem to not be bothered about the real issues that effect most people's everyday lives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...