Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5795 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just recieved a phone call from a company called Lowell Financial? The guy on the phone was asking me about a Capital One credit card.

 

He stated that this account was closed in 2002 but it had an outstanding balance of £2'700'00. I told him I had a Capital One card in 2000 but not in 2002. The wife says I should have denied all knowledge of ever having a card? :( Anyway I've told him I had one in 2000 (Have I done wrong?) He also wants me to send photo copy's of my Driving licence, and passport. to compare signatures? I also put my foot in it again, by asking if the debt is mine? it should be time barred.:( Again the wife says I should have said nothing.

 

I honestly thought I had closed this, and dealt with this. But it looks like it's come back to haunt me. I have no intention of sending off my driving licence or passport

 

Can anyone help me with this.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you have neither sent a payment to them OR made any acknowledgment to the debt for at least 6 years then this is statute barred - send them this letter...

 

1 High Street,

Newtown,

Kent

R21 4RH

 

 

June 28, 2006

 

 

The Loan Company

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite right Stretch....asking for copies of your passport and driving licence i'm sure is verging on the criminal !!! Also mention in your letter that - I AM NOT PREPARED TO ACCEPT ANY PHONE CALLS FROM YOUR COMPANY - ALL CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE IN WRITING ONLY - ANY CALLS RECEIVED WILL BE CLASSED AS HARRASSMENT AND TREATED AS SUCH....they will say anything to make you pay up.....!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have neither sent a payment to them OR made any acknowledgment to the debt for at least 6 years then this is statute barred - send them this letter...

 

1 High Street,

Newtown,

Kent

R21 4RH

 

 

June 28, 2006

 

 

The Loan Company

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

 

Thanks for the very quick response. The thing thats getting me with this is. According to the guy on the phone the account was closed on the 12th February 2002? He also stated the last payment Capital One had was for £45 but he had no idea on which date. If this was true it will not be statute barred as it's just under 6 years? I love the letter but I've no idea what the account number is to include it in the letter. Sorry for being a thicko.

 

 

Quite right Stretch....asking for copies of your passport and driving licence i'm sure is verging on the criminal !!! Also mention in your letter that - I AM NOT PREPARED TO ACCEPT ANY PHONE CALLS FROM YOUR COMPANY - ALL CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE IN WRITING ONLY - ANY CALLS RECEIVED WILL BE CLASSED AS HARRASSMENT AND TREATED AS SUCH....they will say anything to make you pay up.....!!!!

 

Thanks mate I'll do that. Theres no chance they are getting copy's of anything. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recieved a letter from this company today. Below are the details of this letter. Any advice gratefully recieved.

 

We are trying to contact you regarding the address of (previous address)

 

We have recently been given information that you previously resided there.

 

It would be appreciated if you would contact us immediatley on the telephone number provided below, to confirm the update to your address details.

 

If we do not here from you. We will assume the information to be correct and update our systems accordingly.

 

 

What do I do now? Just ignore the letter, or send the letter, 42man posted yesterday?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should give you the acc number on it.

 

I would then asvise that you should just add that to the letter that 42man posted yesterday and send it recorded delivery at least.

  • Haha 1

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will not be admitting anything they are the ones that have to prove everything.

 

Do you still have all the original paper work to dat with C1 and evidence of how the statements were paid?

 

If so l would go threw these over the w/e and see what your paper work says but it is morre important that you get the letter of to them. Ignore what they say they say anything to get ppl to pay up.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be inclined not to do anything until they have written to you with the correct information. It looks to me as if they are just fishing.

 

DCAs do sometimes chase debts they shouldn't in the hope that they'll pick on someone who will be compliant and do everything they ask and make it easy for them to make a bit of money.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then lets get things straight.

 

First NEVER talk to these "people" on the phone as they will say anything to secure payment.

 

Next, as they are phishing for information in their letter make them prove that any debt even exists.

Throw this at them.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Now the onus is on THEM to prove there is any debt at all, NOT for you prove the opposite.

 

If they are relying on some alleged payment made in 2002, then they better have the paperwork to back it up, otherwise Statute of Limitations comes into play.

Otherwise your next response should be a Statute Barred letter as mentioned by 42man earlier.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then lets get things straight.

 

First NEVER talk to these "people" on the phone as they will say anything to secure payment.

 

Next, as they are phishing for information in their letter make them prove that any debt even exists.

Throw this at them.

 

 

 

Now the onus is on THEM to prove there is any debt at all, NOT for you prove the opposite.

 

If they are relying on some alleged payment made in 2002, then they better have the paperwork to back it up, otherwise Statute of Limitations comes into play.

Otherwise your next response should be a Statute Barred letter as mentioned by 42man earlier.

 

Ben thanks for the response. I will fire of a copy of the above letter to this company on Monday. I will get back and tell you how I got on.

 

I would like at this point to thank everyone for there very valuable help.

 

 

Stretchmo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dear xxxx

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely,

 

 

 

 

 

 

right then, thats the letter to deal with their threats of door stepping RE your PM

 

now then, i think we need to follow the statutory route and issue a CCA request,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

you need letter N and write accross the top I DONT NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU PURPORT OT REPRESENT

 

Also dont sign it but instead PRINT YOUR NAME that goes for BOTH lettter

 

Send a one pound postal order with the CCA request and send it recorded delivery

 

they then have to comply within 12 working days

 

send the letters and see what comes back

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends. How long is it since you acknowledged the debt?

 

As you may no in Scotland the law is 5 years till SB. So if it is 5 years then you dont have to acknowledge the debt. I would just then send the SB letter in the templates letters.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're in Scotland then the debt is Statute Barred as it is five years there. This lot are real clowns and should now be reported to the OFT and the Trading Standards people as they are in clear breach of Scottish law.

 

:D :D I may just get in touch with the OFT and Trading standards after the holidays. Thanks for your help. :lol:

 

Depends. How long is it since you acknowledged the debt?

 

As you may no in Scotland the law is 5 years till SB. So if it is 5 years then you dont have to acknowledge the debt. I would just then send the SB letter in the templates letters.

 

Chrissi

 

Chrissi. I have never acknowledged the debt. If you go back to my originalpost I was a wee bit shocked at them getting in touch in the first place. But I've never acknowledged the debt was mine.

 

According to the idiot on the phone the account was closed in February 2002. I have heard nothing from anyone regarding this alleged debt, until the begining of this month. If what you are saying, along with sillygirl1 is correct then it is well passed statute barrred. 6 years will have passed in February 2008.

 

I'm now well chuffed and will have a great Xmas. As I hope everyone of you who have contributed to my post wil also have a great and debt free xmas. Thank you all again. I'll keep you posted how I get on. :D

 

 

Merry Xmas and thanks.

 

Stretchmo

Link to post
Share on other sites

No as they debt is SB from February 2007. SB is 5 years in scotland.

 

Yes you may not have acknowledged the debt but it goes from when the last payment was made so if it was made say june 2002 then 5 years from then is june 2007.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy that called me had no idea when the last payment was made? As others have said on this topic. They have dangled a worm, and hoped to get a bite. :D Well after all the great posts on this topic. This Fish aint biting.:D

 

I have printed of a few of the letters, and I'm going to get in touch with the OFT, and trading standards after the holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're in Scotland then the debt is Statute Barred as it is five years there. This lot are real clowns and should now be reported to the OFT and the Trading Standards people as they are in clear breach of Scottish law.

 

 

Sorry to bring this back to the top again but I'm just looking for another wee bit of advice.

 

I received a letter this morning from this company again. Below are the contents of this letter.

 

Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the above matter.

We have noted your comments but would advise that with the information we hold we believe that you are in fact our customer and therefore responsible for the outstanding balance.

We now require you to contact us on the above number to discuss your proposals for repayment.

We trust this clarifies the situation and look forward to hearing from you.

I called Trading standards this morning but they are on holiday. I then called the OFT and asked about statute barred. The guy on the phone said that this company could have a resonable claim if I had moved house over the last 4/5 years. I explained that I had moved house 4 years ago, and all my mail was redirected. I also explained that this is the first I have heard from this company. He told me to call the Financial services Ombusman? And if they were no help, call the CAB (who are also on holiday)

 

My question is what letter do I send now? Letter N or the letter 42man posted on this thread regarding statute barred?

 

Thanks again for reading and I hope to have this resolved after the holidays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes just send letter N as that would be best for you.

 

Remebr the $1 fee, sorry on a different comp to normal and this does not have a pound sign. Remebr to send by recorded delivery at least.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Sorry to bring this back up again but I need some more information.:confused:

 

I sent away letter N. And today I've received this reply.

 

 

We are in receipt of your request for a copy of your credit agreement in accordance with section 78(1) of the consumer credit act 1974.

 

We are also in receipt of the prescribed fee from you.

 

We are requesting a copy of the agreement from the original lender with whom you originally entered into the agreement.

 

While we endeavour to reply to you with the required information within the prescribed 12 day period under the consumer credit act,you will appreciate this is dependant upon receipt of the information from the original creditor

 

We will advise you further if it will take longer than the prescribed period.

What do I do now? wait or send them some other letter. I've been unable to get to a Citizens advice Bureau,due to work commitments.

 

Thanks for all the help so far. I just need another wee hand.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wait thats all you can do.

 

I know it is boring and no fun but you could always do those jobs that u were putting off or spend more time on here

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wait thats all you can do.

 

I know it is boring and no fun but you could always do those jobs that u were putting off or spend more time on here

 

Chrissi

 

Thanks. Better not let the wife see this or I'll be painting, doing DIY until they reply.:D

 

So if they dont reply within 12 days nothing changes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...