Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DebtWeary V Connaughts - Success!!


Guest DebtWeary
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest DebtWeary

Hi everyone, I am new here and am so grateful to have found you! As the title suggests, I am yet another victim of the above DCA. It's a long story so I will try to be brief!

 

At the moment I have been served with a Statutory Demand (I was expecting it and it was personally served on me last Tues. 30th October). I hve since written to Connaught staing that I will offer a revised payment of £200 a month and sent them a cheque for this amount. The debt itself is one that arose from a personal account overdraft with Lloyds tsb, and got to Connaught via the usual route of Ist Credit. It originally started at around £11000 and I have so far paid of nearly £3000 in the 3 or so years since Connaught got hold of it.

 

It is clear from what I have read in the posts here just what this Connaught outfit are like. I did exactly what they wanted me to do and acted out of fear and ignorance of my rights.

 

In my letter I also told them that my house is in a state of disrepair, is in the local Council's system to be repaired, and that the cost of these repairs will be applied as a charge on the property. The bottom line was that I considered that this, together with the mortgage, would wipe out any equity on the property so any attempt to bankrupt me and attempt to force a sale of my home would not get their money back for them.

 

I also spoke to one of their reps on the phone last week trying to reach an agreement. Having read through the posts here, I am now both horrified and very very angry at what this rep told me. He said that in order to withdraw the SD, they would need £4000 lump sum plus a MINIMUM monthly payment of £350! He went on to say that there was no guarantee that this arrangement would be acceptable next week as it would most likely be with their solicitors by then, that their additional costs would be added to the debt (probably putting it over £10000) and that I would have to negotiate with them!

 

I asked why, if I had 21 days to do something about the SD, there should be any solicitor involvement at this stage? He kind of glossed over this saying that they were going for a Bankruptcy Petition so I had basically better get used to the idea.

 

Now I am very unsure what to do next.

 

How much of what they have said and done been so much BS?? From what I have read here, seems like it is mostly empty threats.

 

The other thing I wrote in my letter today was that if I fail to come to an agreement with them, then I shall apply to the Court to have the SD set aside. I went down there today and got the relevant form.

 

PLease, can someone advise me of what to do next? As I said, if only I had come to this site sooner. These b*****rds have given me no end of misery and my health has suffered as a result.

 

Thanks so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It seems more and more debt collection agencies are seeking to take people to court to make them bankrupt or to place a charge on their homes. The first course of action is to send off a request for a CCA

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− (write the reference number here)

 

With reference to the above agreement, we would be grateful if you would send us a copy of this credit agreement.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), we are entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. We enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

We understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

DO NOT HAND SIGN THE LETTER !!! AND SEND BY RECORDED OR GUARANTEED DELIVERY - this puts the debt into dispute immediately. It may be that you have also had some excessive charges added to the account too....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting the CCA request into them gives you a bit of breathing space so as yo can make sure that proof of the debt exist and these Connaughts have the right to be chasing you for it. Read this thread for some excellent advice http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/112326-debt-collection-agencies-statutory.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Thank you all for your replies. I feel at last that there is some hope!

 

I've been digging around through my old correspondance and have found my original contact letters plus a letter from 1st Credit telling me that the debt from Lloyds tsb had been assigned to them.

 

Before I write requesting a CCA, I want to be clear that, as this was an overdraft that got out of control, is it still definitely subject to the CCA?

 

Also, does the fact that Lloyds assigned the debt to 1st Credit without asking me first constitute them breaking the law? I seem to remember seeing that in one of the posts here.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Hi ODC, no I don't think so, I have found various other letters from DCAs but there is no reference to any loan. I need to find out all the statements relating to the account so I can see how the balance was arrived at. Does that mean that the CCA does not apply?

 

I recall that there were numerous charges relating to the account so I would appear to have grounds for disputing the amount for that reason alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ODC, no I don't think so, I have found various other letters from DCAs but there is no reference to any loan. I need to find out all the statements relating to the account so I can see how the balance was arrived at. Does that mean that the CCA does not apply?

 

I recall that there were numerous charges relating to the account so I would appear to have grounds for disputing the amount for that reason alone.

As far as I know an overdraft is included as its a running credit agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know an overdraft is included as its a running credit agreement.

 

A overdraft is regulated by the CCA, however, the requirements for the credit agreement are very limited, and so almost all overdrafts are enforceable.

 

Has the OP contacted the national debt line? I suggest he/she does so as a matter of urgency. Stat demands served by a process server require urgenr professional advice.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Tomterm8 I have been doing extensive research on all this. I did receive an SD from this lot once before, hand-served not posted, but I managed to reach an agreement with them. I have also dug out the original correspondance from them, as well as 1st Credit's letter telling me they has acquired the debt.

 

I don't know if you or anyone can answer the question: Did 1st Credit or Lloyds act illegally but not asking my permission to transfer the debt?

 

I understand that the CCA does not hold so much water with overdrafts. However, I will still send both parties a letter anyway. If I get no reply to my original letter tomorrow then I will say that I have looked at the origins of the debt and an disputing the amount, as there were numerous charges involved here. For that reason alone, they will have to suspend any further action.

 

One more question - the rep I spoke to at Connaught stated that solicitors would most likely be involved this week. Surely it is acting improperly for them to do this BEFORE the 21 days has elapsed?

 

One other thing - the process server last week said to me "Are you going to go bankrupt" in such a way that suggested "You really should you know, it's inevitable". I told him "Not if I can avoid it". Incidentally, I have a letter from the Process Server in question, Bishop Investigations and Security Services, from back in 2004, when they first threatened to issue an SD, who just happen to have the same address as Connaught. Hmm!

 

Once again, thanks for all the input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomterm8 I have been doing extensive research on all this. I did receive an SD from this lot once before, hand-served not posted, but I managed to reach an agreement with them. I have also dug out the original correspondance from them, as well as 1st Credit's letter telling me they has acquired the debt.

 

I don't know if you or anyone can answer the question: Did 1st Credit or Lloyds act illegally but not asking my permission to transfer the debt?

No. However, the assignment may be an equitable rather than legal assignment if some of the legal requirements have not been fulfilled, such as the notice of assignment served properly.

 

I understand that the CCA does not hold so much water with overdrafts. However, I will still send both parties a letter anyway. If I get no reply to my original letter tomorrow then I will say that I have looked at the origins of the debt and an disputing the amount, as there were numerous charges involved here. For that reason alone, they will have to suspend any further action.

 

You should S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) the original creditor. Did the debt contain substantial charges?

 

One more question - the rep I spoke to at Connaught stated that solicitors would most likely be involved this week. Surely it is acting improperly for them to do this BEFORE the 21 days has elapsed?

 

It would be quite improper to file a bankruptcy petition before 21 days elapses. You REALLY need to contact the national debt line, in my view.

 

One other thing - the process server last week said to me "Are you going to go bankrupt" in such a way that suggested "You really should you know, it's inevitable". I told him "Not if I can avoid it". Incidentally, I have a letter from the Process Server in question, Bishop Investigations and Security Services, from back in 2004, when they first threatened to issue an SD, who just happen to have the same address as Connaught. Hmm!

 

It may be a threat-o-gram, however, connaught has issued bankruptcy petitions before. Look up the thread by 42man. They are... um... unprintable, in my view.

 

Once again, thanks for all the input.

 

Might be worth PMing sequenci, who has quite a lot of experience with these issues.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Thanks tomterm8, I appreciate your help. Yes, I can believe these people would go for a petition, which is why I wrote to them, as I mentioned in my original post, that there won't be any equity left in the house once our local council slaps a repair order on it, so they would be basically wasting their time. I don't have any other assets.

 

I need to dig out my statements for this account and establish the scale of the charges.

 

Can you confirm that the fact that I AM about to query the charges included in the debt balance that this is enough to stop them taking any further action until the query is resolved?

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

In case it comes to this with my current dealings with Connaught/1st Credit, I would be interested to hear of anyone who has completed the relevant Court forms and submitted them.

 

Did anyone have to attend a hearing with a judge? I understand that this may happen if the judge needs more information. If this did happen, did anyone take along legal representation?

 

I have had such hearings just with a judge (3 in fact) for mortgage re-possession but I never had representation(in each case the possession was suspended thankfully) but I discussed things with the mortgage lender's representative before the hearing and he/she did most of the talking.

 

Also, if it came to a hearing, does the creditor have to send, and thus pay for, a representative?

 

Hope some one can throw some light on this.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be your grounds for asking for the set aside? Are there charges on the account?

 

It's generally quite easy to set aside an SD (remember about 90% of them are just used as a scare tactic) and no you don't need legal representation.

 

As Giz says it's quite late now so, if no one else does, I'll give you some more assistance tomorrow (well later today). Anyway here is some info on SD's Legal Issues Explained - Statutory Demand

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Thanks guys, much appreciated. The debt was originally a Lloyds tsb current account overdraft that got out of control. Buried in my archives somewhere are all the statements (I hope!) and I am sure that there are penalty charges involved.

 

It seems that SDs can be simply withdrawn; I had one before. I believe that the creditor has a time limit within which it must apply for a Petition otherwise the SD becomes invalid. Not sure what that is though.

 

It would I think be a good thing if more of these SDs from these particular outfits were chucked out as they would then become a matter of public record. As it is, they continue to get away with issuing them at the drop of a hat. God they must issue thousands of them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

God they must issue thousands of them!

Yes as an industry they do and the reason is it costs them nothing and scares a lot of people into paying without questioning the debt. Bankruptcy procedings of course are quite expensive.

 

How much is the overdraft amount roughly and how much do you think the charges might be? If you don't have all your statements you can send a SAR to get them (costs a tenner).

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

The overdraft was eventually frozen at about £11000 (don't ask, it's a very long story!) but I have paid back nearly £3000 to Connaught before this unpleasantness started. My very first communication from them was in the form of an SD threat (as so many others here have described). I guess I will approach Ist Credit who bought the debt from Lloyds for details of the debt. Given that the overdraft reached such dizzying levels, I am sure there are considerable charges involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would certainly have grounds for setting the SD aside if you believe the amount being claimed on the demand is wrong. Certainly look to CCA 1st Credit if you've not already do so, consider a SAR to Lloyds too.

 

I would also like you to consider complaining to The FOS and OFT about 1st credit's use of SDs as I strongly feel that bankruptcy proceedings should not be used as a punitive measure.

 

To answer your question I've known of LOADS of SDs to be set aside so long as the grounds are sufficient.

 

Do you live in mortgaged or rented accomodation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...