Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

washing machine problems - any advice


mdavids
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was reliably informed that most washing machines these days are rubbish so I bought the cheapest one I could from currys and then paid for a 5 year whatever happens extended warranty. Since I bought it, the machine has randomly decided not to go onto a fast spin from time to time meaning washing sometimes comes out dripping wet. After a few months the problem became permanent so it got repaired through the manufacturer (beko). At first the fault was misdiagnosed then I had 2 appointments cancelled then finally the motor and circuit board were replaced. Although it was fixed it would still randomly not spin out but I was reluctant to call the engineer again because I doubted I would beable to demonstrate the fault. The problem became permanent again in september and its now over a year old so its currys responsibility. Again the fault was misdiagnosed with the engineer telling my girlfriend that it was a load balance problem and we just had to "persevere with it". On the next callout he found the waste pipe to be kinked off where the last repairmen had pushed it back too far. This seemed to fix the problem but once again it would sometimes not spin out and now 1 month later the problem has again become permanent.

I am now totally fed up. My girlfriend has had to wait in for the engineers on 7 separate occasions and is giving me grief for buying a pile of crap which has regularly left us with mountains of washing. I have tried to complain to currys and have gotten nowwhere and been passed between departments by people who just dont want to know and dont give a toss. IMO for a machine to go wrong as much as this there must be something fundamentally wrong with it but because its mainly an intermittant fault, even when it appears to have been repaired its actually still broken. Currys have told me that for the machine to be replaced the engineer needs to declare it a write off but how do I get him to do this when he thinks its fixed but I know its not and its just going to go wrong again.

For those that are interested, heres a link to a consumer review site for the same machine and theres at least six comments from people who are having similar problems.

 

Beko WMA 510, 97 confirmed customer reviews on Reevoo

 

Do you think currys know about this fault and are just fobbing me off?

I am trying to arrange to be there when the engineer comes out again but they cant give me an exact time and I cant get the time off to wait in all day. I get the impression that they think they can just tell my girlfriend anything.

Any advice on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok first of all you have to be there when the repair man comes.

Talk to him and and try demonstrating the problem before he touches the machine, show your proof of repaires for the same problem to him too.

Ask him to write it off, as reapiring will do the same thing again.

Also currys will give you this problem of not wanting to deal with you. therefore i suggest that you write a formal letter to them complaining about the issue and state that you want it replaced.

I would recomend that you get the contract where it states that they cannot give you a replacement untill its written off in print.

If they cannot give you that then you are entitled to t a new machine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to write to the store concerned, copying in one of the 'higher-ups', setting out your grievance and what they can do to make you a happy customer again. Barracad's Guide is a good one to follow. You need to decide what you will be happy with - a replacement of the same model? different model? a straight refund? - and then you can tailor your resolution request to that end. Currys are liable to you under the Sale of Goods Act (insufficient quality, durability) and beginning to create a paper trail like this will stand you in good stead if you do end up having to go to Small Claims over the situation. It shows that you are making reasonable attempts to resolve it. It also shows the Currys representatives that you are aware of your rights and are prepared to exercise them.

 

Here's the full Sale of Goods Act; here's a more streamlined explanation.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so you know washing machines are unreliable. so rather then buying a more expensive one or checking reviews of top quality low fault report washing machines you bought the lowest price one.

 

knowing full well if it went wrong you have not lost too much money to buy a new one.

 

secondly you purchased a 5 year warrenty which means if it goes faulty it will be repaired.

 

so you know its a cheap one you have been infirmed they are unreliable and now you want to complain and blame someone else that they have to keep turning up?

 

a 5 year guarantee does not mean it makes the machine magically indestructable. it just means someone else deals with faults and repairs.

 

if you want to complain that someone is actually coming out to repair it then i suggest you re-assess your initial buying decisions.

 

ok to the point.

 

you are talking about the terms of there whatever happens agreement which is in addition to SOGA. id suggest talking to currys customer services department and inform them that you are seeking a remedy under the sale of goods act .. forgetting about whatever happens. reverting back to your basic rights

 

tell them that you have had their own engineers out on several different occasions and still the unit is not fully functional. give them the repair references and inform them that after so many repair/inspection attempts you are looking for an alternative remedy in the form of a replacement or recision of contract (refund).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP said that the machine has been faulty from purchase. The SoGA does apply (as I already said in my post above), as even as the machine is a cheap one and therefore wouldn't be expected to last as long, it has never worked properly from purchase.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are talking about the terms of there whatever happens agreement which is in addition to SOGA.quote]

 

 

So there is additional conditions set by Currys, but the sale of goods act still applies, and the additionl conditions im assuming is given when you purchase a five year warranty/guarantee

Link to post
Share on other sites

so rather then buying a more expensive one or checking reviews of top quality low fault report washing machines you bought the lowest price one.

 

fred, not everyone is as affluent as you and some can only afford the lower priced equipment or they would have gone for a top quality one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

my point was you fully knew and understood at the time of purchase that you did not want to buy a high quality, high priced piece of equipment. you just wanted a cheaper model and you not care about quality beause after a couple of years ud just buy another one...

 

so why now complain that it has failed. by taking a 5 year watever happens does not make the product indestructable for 5 years. it just means there is a less hassle route to get it fixed then relying on your SOGA rights which may only be honoured by going to court.

 

hindsight says if you not want the same hassle in 2 years time spend a little more money and buy a higher quality product.

 

yes you do have upto 6 years for a replacement under SOGA. please read the word UPTO. again UPTO.

 

retailers are known to beleive the length of a manufacturers guarantee is the lifespan of the product. thats why some washing machines come with 5 year guarantees as standard and others come with only one. so asking a retailer to repair it under SOGA is hard especially with untrained store staff.. i would advise contacting the complaints department or someone higher up to get action

 

the only way to truly gain your SOGA rights is if you can somehow prove the life expectancy of the product via either a whitepaper or quote from the manufacturer. or by taking the retailer to court.

 

now think about hindsight. maybe its worth spending a little extra for the higher quality product if you dont like it when it fails. warrenties dont make things indestructable. if you dont want things repaired. then you might want to think about looking into a household insurance policy that does straight like for like swaps next day. they are better then warrenties or court cases

  • Sad 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...