Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our Retail Loss Prevention subforum for further advice. It sounds as if you may get letters from people like DWF solicitors or a company called Retail Loss Prevention but we always recommend to ignore them. If the police weren't called on the day you aren't going to hear from them. Ask us any questions you want to and keep in touch but I don't think this will go anywhere. Best, HB
    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Possible Grievance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening everyone,

 

Just need some advice really. I have a problem with my line manager at my place of employment. History to it is that he chose me to go on an inhouse training course leading to promotion. Ever since he seems to have it in for me and basically keeps saying I'm not improving in the areas I need to improve on, no matter how hard I try but giving me no support, feedback or training to help improve these areas. Everything kind of came to a head on Tuesday, when he pulled me into a meeting room to 'talk to me' about a call he had listened to of mine. It basically was a case of every time he asked me why I had said something, he would shoot it down and say 'no, I believe you said that because........'. The meeting ended with him threatening that if he listened to another call like that he would kick me off the course, but also send me back to the team of trainees (the team when you first join the company). I have been in my job for 14 months now, and he knows that no-one would ever ake the humiliation of going back to that team and would rather quit. I feel that is what he is trying to make me do. Also, he hasn't followed company policies and procedures. Do I have a solid case for a grievance against him? Any opinions would be welcome.

 

Thank you

S.A.R SENT TO ABBEY 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think so, read through your customer handbook and your grievance procedure and try to follow it to the letter.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done this and I am pretty certain I have a case. I also spoke to my HR dept about it oday. here response was to say 'Try and talk to him about it!' So much for trying to get some unbiased advice from them!!!!!

S.A.R SENT TO ABBEY 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Its always good practice to try and resolve problems directly with the person concerned. If that fails then put a grievance in writing into HR.

This letter means that a meeting has to be held to hear your grievance within 28 days.

 

In your letter, outline the reason for your grievance, you do not have to go into detail just an outline.

 

In answer to your question....................yes i would say you have a grievance but do try talking to the manager first.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normal advice is to try and resolve a grievance informally directly with the person in question or if you feel uncomfortable about this ask a colleague. If this fails (and contrary to what Cal said) I would put a detailed letter together clearly highlighting the facts alleged, identify the subject of the grievance and the remedy sort. Your organisation then has a duty to investigate and look to resolve the matter. Another option you may wish to consider is mediation between you and your manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed every company would love someone to put a detailed letter in, They then can take 28 days to counter any grievance if they wish to do so.

 

I just quote the law and all the law requires is a letter outlining the greavance. If you wish to write a 3 page essay then feel free to do so, however in my experience its not necessary and can be counter productive.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry did not realise we were being pedantic. An employee must indeed write a letter to their employer and wait 28 days before any claim can be submitted to an ET. However an employer is wise to hold a meeting within 28 days o the point it has almost become good practice.

 

An ET would consider an employer not to have followed thestatutory grievance procedures, if they failed to respond within a reasonable time (now considered 28 days).

 

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best advice would be to read the ACAS guide. "Almost good practice" - that must be good practice which is not quite good enough! As an ex-union man, you are clearly an expert on being pedantic having said the same thing 3 times in a post of 4 sentences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...