Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Moral Initiative


sosumi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6072 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A campaign to 'collect' on moral debts?

DCAs knowingly mislead people, ignore the OFT Guidelines and CSA Code of Practice. They harass, intimidate and threaten.

These are all fundamental issues. They are moral issues.

I'd suggest we start our own 'bills' for each DCA - and even the Original Creditors.

Each time they mislead, for example, would be one MD - Moral Debt.

So, say you have 4 letters from one Debt Collection Agency that aim to hurt and intimidate you - that would be 4 MDs. And 4 MDs owed by the Original Creditor... They 'referred' you, they are equally to blame.

Another example - Every repeated telephone call you receive from a DCA, when you have insisted on contact only by letter - 1 MD.

Think of it! Those people who get 30 calls a day, would be 'owed' 30 MDs.

Post their 'debts' every time they do it. Keep a tally.

Just something I've been thinking about. Morally, these DCAs owe us big time. Any thoughts anyone? :idea::)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to call this 'The Beryl Initiative' - but didn't for what I hope are obvious reasons.:???:

The other 'Initiative' would be a campaign to get CAG posters in every library, so that people in Beryl's situation could find the help and support on here.

  • Haha 1

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

we could always set up a company and call them 20 - 30 times a day threaten em with "legal action" if they dont cough up :grin:

 

Or send them letters quoting various philosophical texts dealing with ethics and morality.

 

They'd need help with the long words, obviously.

 

Actually, that's a good idea - whenever you write to a DCA, get a thesaurus out and substitute as many words as possible with complicated synonyms.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or send them letters quoting various philosophical texts dealing with ethics and morality.

 

They'd need help with the long words, obviously.

 

Actually, that's a good idea - whenever you write to a DCA, get a thesaurus out and substitute as many words as possible with complicated synonyms.

 

Funnily, I've been thinking about this. I don't know of any text in ethics that specifically talks about DCAs

 

:D

 

But there's loads of stuff about the morality of coercion. Cor, does this mean that my day job is finally going to relevant for something?

 

:-o

  • Haha 1

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean my degree is finally relevant for something too? Wow.

Think the basic principles of existentialism could cerainly be applied here.

  • Haha 1

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a shame for them:p Must be making an extra hole in their profits when added to the losses they sustain from people who learn about their rights on these damned internet sites :lol::lol::lol::lol: Maybe they will find out themselves what it is like to be hounded by debt collectors when they go bust.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS complaints ‘not about evasion’ Credit Today News - 10/10/2007

Best to read it now (ie. while it's there!) :)

 

 

Another excellent find by Sosumi :)

 

This one needs to be kept for the DCA employees/excusers who occasionally interrupt with their "you're just trying to dodge" poop.

 

They probably won't listen though. They're brainwashed not to, and many of them actually believe the carp they're told.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the post in this discussion Credit Today online from Edward Pacey as it seems that some senior figures within companies are beginning to concede, albeit very tentatively, that there IS a problem particularly with the collection side of things. It's refreshing to see someone senior admit that DCA's need to be seriously sorted out.

 

I'm convinced that eventually things will have to improve and the DCA's will be reined in and brought under control. But how much longer is it going to take??

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've copied the Credit Today News Article here, and would like to thank Credit Today for making news like this accessible to the general public. :)

FOS complaints ‘not about evasion’ - 10/10/2007

Complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) about debt collection agencies are not from consumers trying to avoid debts, according to the lead ombudsman for banking and credit.

 

Jane Hingston (pictured) told delegates at the Civil Court Users Association conference that the complaints were about people being chased for debts they’d already paid or being chased by five or six different organisations for the same debt.

 

"The focus is more on the arrangement between lenders and collections agencies and the information that passes between them, than consumers trying to evade debts," she said.

 

Delegates raised the issue of the £400 case fee a company must pay if a complaint is investigated against it.

 

Hingston said the fee is reflective of the costs involved in investigating. "We think it is damn good value. You’ve got two months to resolve the complaint and even if they do come to us you get two free cases a year. It’s the same cost to us no matter what the outcome of the case."

 

The industry had previously raised fears that aggrieved consumers with false complaints will go to the ombudsman, racking up lots of costs. However, CSA director Godfrey Lancashire said there haven’t been complaints from members that they are being unfairly treated so far.

 

Steve Meakin from the Institute of Money Advisers said this worry is unnecessary. "There doesn’t seem as yet to be a lot of frivolous and vexatious claims. If there were I’m sure the FOS would take a different view on fees in future. I would hate to see a good idea undermined by vexatious claiming," he said.

 

However, Stephen Sklaroff, Finance & Leasing Association director general, said his members are starting to get claims compensation that are just below the charge for a case if it goes through the FOS.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the post in this discussion Credit Today online from Edward Pacey as it seems that some senior figures within companies are beginning to concede, albeit very tentatively, that there IS a problem particularly with the collection side of things. It's refreshing to see someone senior admit that DCA's need to be seriously sorted out.

 

I'm convinced that eventually things will have to improve and the DCA's will be reined in and brought under control. But how much longer is it going to take??

Yes I like it too DB. I get the feeling that many good people in business are genuinely shocked by the behaviour of 'bad DCAs' that we see so much evidence of here. I think it's encouraging. The 'rogue DCA's' are morally bankrupt. If people continue to challenge and expose their methods, their 'clients' will stop using them. That's why I love CAG. :)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read through the credit today online thread alluded to in previous posts, It seems to me that DCAs are cross that a 'few bad apples are bringing the whole industry into disrepute'.

 

Is it a FEW bad apples? What percentage of DCAs who are involved in consumer debt appear on this CAG section, Are there DCAs who follow the law and OFT guidelines? Bearing in mind that only a few debtors ever reach CAG I would think that even one mention on these boards denotes a bad apple. Research indicated?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...