Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance secured loan - sold to coast now resale to swift advances!!


razorc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi , i have a loan from welcome F (secured) but on the credit agreement my address does not have the flat number of my home , only the address of the whole building as there is 8 houses in the building does this mean the agreement is not complete right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi thanks for quick reply , what you mean by default my account , all the letters we receive from them have our correct flat number on it , just the agreement hasn,t , it was typed by them.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi , i have a loan from welcome F (secured) but on the credit agreement my address does not have the flat number of my home , only the address of the whole building as there is 8 houses in the building does this mean the agreement is not complete right?

 

it is a non-prescribed term which means that it can still be enforced with the leave of the court. it's a minor mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

ah thanks , just asking as there a pain in the arse this mob when you miss 1 payment.

 

 

always telephoning when its time to pay and stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all , I sent my request for the copy of the CCA to welcome fin who received the letter dated 27 june so they have till Wednesday 12th July to send it to me , what do i do if i dont receive it by the 12 calendar working days ?

 

 

cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Razorc,

 

Post number 63 (above) from StoneLaughter might give you some assistance.

 

The trick here is read. If all else fails, by all means ask but most repetative questions are already answered.

 

Sorry if this sounds abrupt but if everyone asked all the same things in every thread it will take hours and hours of reading just to gain some more valuable information.

 

 

Good luck with your claim

 

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

just got my credit agreement from them and noticed mortgage indemnity of £550 on it

 

it was a secure loan of 5000 we got but with this added to it and payment protection insurance added the ammount of the loan has added up to £7142.05

 

ppi - £1357.05 plus the £550 for mortgage indemnity

 

question is these 2 amounts probably get interest added every month

 

have they the right to add this on - mortgage indemnity insurance

 

2 weeks ago i cancelled the PPI form them and told the feckers to recalculate my loan with them

 

but need bit of help with the mortgage indemnity insurance

 

can anyone tell me if a account is in dispute , can they still add interest on to the loan

 

having a nightmare with these

 

they are saying they are adding interest on to it

 

thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Not to sure if it depends on why the account is in dispute, I had them on non compliance of a CCA request, I wrote to them and told them....

 

1) ask you for payment

2) add any charges or interest to the account

3) pass on any information about the account to any 3rd party

4) put any marke on your credit rating.

 

This advise was giving to me at t the time

  • NatWest - Settled in full 8 weeks after LBA (without interest)
  • Capital One - LBA 27th July - Offered & paid £28 - Rejected - settled
  • Monument - LBA 18th July - Offer 19th July - Refused - settled

  • WFS - 8 Point Complaint - awaiting response - Failed CCA Request - awaiting response - Awaiting S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info

***WFS Written Off £8k 01/08/07***

 

Monument sent my info even tho i forgot to send payment!!! Thanx Monumnet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taken from the OFT Debt collection Guidance final Guidance on unfair buisness practices (July 2003) updated (December 2006)

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

a. contacting debtors at unreasonable times and at unreasonable intervals

 

b. pressurising debtors to sell property, to raise funds by further

borrowing or to extend their borrowing

 

c. using more than one debt collection business at the same time

resulting in repetitive and/or frequent contact by different parties

 

d. not ensuring that an adequate history of the debt is passed on as

appropriate resulting in repetitive and/or frequent contact by different

parties

 

e. not informing the debtor when their case has been passed on to a

different debt collector

 

f. pressurising debtors to pay in full, in unreasonably large instalments,

or to increase payments when they are unable to do so

 

g. making threatening statements or gestures or taking actions which

suggest harm to debtors

 

h. ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are

disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

 

i. disclosing or threatening to disclose debt details to third parties unless

legally entitled to do so

 

j. acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor either

deliberately or through lack of care, for example, by not putting

correspondence in a sealed envelope and putting it through a letterbox,

thereby running the risk that it could be read by third parties.

 

 

Look at (h)

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi there can anyone have a look at my agreement having a totall nightmare of a time since nov06

 

loan over 5 years - been in dispite since no 06 - and made no payments.

 

reason is i have finally got them to get the ppi of the loan , and they are giving us a new agreement to sign without the PPi . Payment was £181.36 now it'll be £132 with 24months to go.

 

they are also taking all charges and any interest thats been added took off and giving us £350. as goodwill . (hooray not)

 

Also when we took out the loan which was in oct03 , which is a secured loan

- i live with my girlfriend who bought the house , i'm not named on it

 

at the time we took the loan i was in temp work ,

on the agreement i am named as the consentor ,

anyone know what that means and can they make me a consentor to a loan if am a temp worker ,

 

they have included my wage at the time with my girlfriends.

 

i can scan the agreeement if anyone wants to check it out for me

 

thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allo Steven , heres our orginal agreement with welcome , if anyone can have a look at it for us

 

link here - Image of agreement - old one - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

 

 

trying to find out these answers

 

1 - I am named as a consentor on it as i am not named on girlfriends mortage and at the time they included my wages as a temp worker as my girlfriend would not have be able to afford the loan , so should we have been accepted for the loan

 

2 - does the agreement look all ok ?

 

thanks for the help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Razorc

 

I am not an expert, this is my opinion only, best post it on those threads I mentioned, if you can get peterbard to have a look at it. He is the best and very helpful.

 

It looks like all of the prescribed terms are there. They have been very carefule to state the ppi and that you fully understand the process. Did you receive the policy and the terms and condition of the ppi

 

Things I think are a bit difficult to know so may need the expert. It states that it is an application for the loan as they will be referring to the credit reference agencies. There is no cancellation rights. and at the bottom rt hand corner it state your rights. Something about you should have received your agreement 7 days prior to signing . Did that happen???? There maybe something else to do with the total charge for credit not being applied correctly. There is no date in your signature box.

 

Sorry I cannot be more helpful, but these are my observations so I am not sure that it is enforcable or not

 

Please do post the agreement on those thread. The more opinions you get the better.

 

Good luck, will watch with interest.

  • Haha 1

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this is an a copy of an enforceable agreement. Section 127 of the Act:

127.--(1) In the case of an application for an enforcement order under--

(a) section 65(1) (improperly executed agreements), or

(b) section 105(7)(a) or (b) (improperly executed security instruments), or

© section 111(2) (failure to serve copy of notice on surety), or

(d) section 124(1) or (2) (taking of negotiable instrument in contravention of section 123),

the court shall dismiss the application if, but (subject to subsections (3) and (4)) only if, it considers it just to do so having regard to--

(i) prejudice caused to any person by the contravention in question, and the degree of culpability for it; and

(ii) the powers conferred on the court by subsection (2) and sections 135 and 136.

(2) If it appears to the court just to do so, it may in an enforcement order reduce or discharge any sum payable by the debtor or hirer, or any surety, so as to compensate him for prejudice suffered as a result of the contravention in question.

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

Section 127(3) makes it clear that an agreement is only enforceable if it is singed by you and has all the prescribed terms of the agreement. THis last is interpreted as meaning on the same side as your signature not on the opposite side as here as you need to be seen to have signed up to them.

 

Perhaps someone else will confirm.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...