My Partner Legally changed her Surname on 24th April 2018

And DVLA were informed immediately , there is a reference number on the new log book , being 08/05/2018 which may be when it took effect on the log book

My partners NEW name was Typed at the bottom of HER letter to Parking Eye , but the reply came back with her old name on it

as for the defence, do we mention that the driver of the vehicle has not been identified or proven ?

or that we were genuine customers at the Restaurant on site ?

Many thanks

No and no

More is less

Post it here first!!

PE get POFA bit right so they create keeper liability.

However, they have to have a lawful contract in the first place so just pointing out they dont is all you need.

The detail is for on the day, you will have plenty of time to expand on this simple statement but you never know they may well drop the matter knowing that by defending you are going to cost them £50 more than they can get from winning their claim.

Name difference is immaterial, she was that name once and in this timescale that is good enough.

do I post the defence on line ?

Thats what its there for

Post it here 1st mind..

No monies can be due by the defendant to the claimant as there was no offer of a contract made at the time so there can be no breach of contract

The defendant believes that the claimant does no have planning permission for

1 its signage

2 ANPR equipment

So cannot invite the defendant to enter into a criminal compact.

I hope that is Adequate and in order ?

Sending now

Just received a letter from HM Courts and Tribunals

please see attached

HM Court Reply Redacted.pdf

so they have 28 days

now go read like threads

that's a std letter

I assumed it was a standard but thought it best to show progress.

I was asked to show my defence letter before sending it but no one replied so i sent it without your perusal so as not to miss the deadline

post it up.

#31

Anything happened since August 1st?

Hi,

Many thanks for the reminder.

We have had a badly photocopied document arrive this week in a badly hand written envelope which seemed to have no sign of date or relevance or what to do ?

and then on friday

this arrived. I have only copied the first page as i don't have the full document with me

merged your last 2 posts and removed the huge uploads [we don't need to see their n180 nor the NOA we know what they look like and say]

next time please read upload and try and make your files not so huge!!

ok have you been reading threads since you filed your defence and been getting upto speed on what come next?

if not do so CAG is self help too

strange PE have agreed to mediation

there is no point.

so have you received your blank N180 to fill in from the court yet?

and don't forget you've not posted your defence you filed up yet too?

I HAVE THE PLANNING APPLICATION FOR SIGNS AND CAMERAS

It appears both were applied for before the alleged offence both Approved After

Does this make it Unlawful and non contractible ?

Friday 04 May 2018

It is also interesting that the sign shown does not appear on the planning application

this is the Defence I filed

Default Re: ParkingEye ANPR PCN Claimform - overstay - M&U Phase 1, Portishead (Lidl, Travelodge, Subway), Harbour Road, Portish

No monies can be due by the defendant to the claimant as there was no offer of a contract made at the time so there can be no breach of contract

The defendant believes that the claimant does no have planning permission for

1 its signage

2 ANPR equipment

So cannot invite the defendant to enter into a criminal compact.

So this is the Planning Application 18/P/2348/ADV

Lodged with North Somerset

Retention of 29 non illuminated parking signs mounted on lighting columns and signage poles

see Page 51 For

Application Received: Fri 09 Feb 2018

Application Validated: Mon 12 Mar 2018

Decision Issued Date: Fri 04 May 2018

planning stuff .pdf

better to do one multipage pdf please

thread tidied

I've moved your replies to belix to his thread

all todays pdfs merged to post 42

all todays pdfs merged to post 43

I can't see them! Help!

post 42 then

merged your last 2 posts and removed the huge uploads [we don't need to see their n180 nor the NOA we know what they look like and say]

next time please read upload and try and make your files not so huge!!

 

ok have you been reading threads since you filed your defence and been getting upto speed on what come next?

if not do so CAG is self help too

 

strange PE have agreed to mediation

there is no point.

 

so have you received your blank N180 to fill in from the court yet?

Yes we Now have the N180 form

 

and don't forget you've not posted your defence you filed up yet too?

Would you suggest we entertain the idea of mediation or just go straight to small claims track ?

Hi again -

I'll just insert my twopence worth here.

Having read Parking Prankster's book on how to defend against PE, I am completely put-off the idea of going to court. It seems complex, and a lot of work, and so far I haven't felt swayed by any of the defence arguments being aired. Personally, I am thinking in terms of negotiating pre-court. Up to you, of course. To me, it seems that taking it to court has to be fuelled by principle.

with reference to the date of approval being May 4th 2018 and the alleged offence being 13th March 2018 would this make any presumed contract unlawful ?