Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bank holiday time


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

its hopefully a quick query

 

recently we have had a communication at work (large company merged recently)

 

previously if we have worked a bank holiday (usually 10 hours) we have been paid time and a half for this and earnt time in leu - this has been 10 hours

 

recently we noticed that the hours for this hadnt been added, after alot of chasing we were told that they were now added at the start of the holiday year.

 

however we have only been granted 7.5 hours per bank holiday, their reasoning for has only just been given to us

 

copied below

 

---

 

To confirm a payroll week runs from Sunday to Saturday and the payroll team will process this accordingly, with this

in mind, certain rota’s will either work three or four days per week.

For the vast majority of our colleagues a full time working week is 37.5 hours per week, which equates to 1,950 hours

over the year (37.5 hours per week x 52 weeks in a year) – regardless of shift pattern. This includes the MyTime rota,

as additional hours worked are given in lieu time.

The standard contract template is 5 over 7, so holiday entitlement is calculated as 7.5 hours x the contractual number

of days entitlement for that colleague.

 

---

 

this would be fine if we WORKED 7.5 hours a bank holiday however we work between 10 and 11 hours on a bank holiday, even worse they have based the hours over a 5/7 contract

 

most of our workplace is on a 4on 4off rota, in my case im on flexible working and my current time is either 3 or 4 days in 7

 

we have asked for explanations but just keep being given the same details as above

 

we have also been told that if we want the days the business is closed off (christmas day etc) then we have to book it off, on asking if that means we have to give the 7.5 hours back we have been told that no we have to use 10/11 hours of holiday time

 

any advice?

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paid holiday is calculated on the number of hours a year you work but normally rationalised into days leave. You need to do your sums as to how may hours you work and how long the average day is and then check your leave entitlement they are saying you have against these figures. If your normal working day is 10 hours then that makes things simple, if you work an 8 hour day but do longer shifts at certain times then the hourly rate should apply.

 

Also, do you get paid on an hourly basis- agreed rate per hour- or as an annual/monthly salary that is then an average of 1/12th of a year.

using their sums they are admitting that there is an inbuilt error so you need to challenge this as a gropup rather than as individuals.

 

They are using days and not hours although they admit that hours are assumed for the working year. Urging will do no good, you need to present your figures and show why they are fairer and how they may keep the company away from a claim against them under the WTD.

 

Unions are good for this sort of collective head slapping of intransigent management. However, they also state that you get TOIL to correct certain errors so again is this what actually happens? if it is the you are starting a fight with yourself

Edited by Andyorch
Paras and typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

The time in leu is in our contract that if we work a bank holiday we get time and a half and a day in leu

 

If we don't work it as a scheduled day off then we simply get the day in leu

 

Most peoples shifts are either 11.5 hours or 10.5 minus a half hour lunch so 10/11

 

Mine are always 10 hours due to flex time

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry didn't ge time to finish questions

 

Ours is a salaried basis based on year devided by 13

 

I will have a look at their sums and rerun them

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

latest from work below

 

one of our Coordinators, has agreed to take on the job of collating all questions from all colleagues about the holiday issues and has committed to getting answers from as far up the corporate HR ladder as it is necessary to go. This will produce a comprehensive FAQ to help all of us.

 

In the interim, the easiest way to think of the new policy is, if you work 4 on and 4 off you should no longer think of your annual leave in days but think of it in hours. Whatever your shift, 4 on 4 off, 5 over 7, 5 over 8 or whatever combination of hours, your contracted hours are 1950 per year, or 37.5 per week. So, whether you work a bank holiday or have the day off, the only hours to be spent or accrued in the legal sense is 7.5 hours.

 

Yes, those of us who would normally work an 11.5-hour day will be losing out on the 4 hours that we had been receiving previously, but remember that those 4 hours were hours that we were not entitled to.

The company legal team have told us that the changes must happen to ensure compliance with the law.

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are salaried then the actual working day isnt that relevant as long as the working year is correct. If they are saying that a bank holiday only eats up 7.5 hours of your accrued holidy hours then that is good but if they are saying a day off on a BH uses up 11.5 hours because that is your NORMAL working day that is bad and you need to get them to stick to the actual hours used, even if it produces some odd results. Being paid extra for a BH is a bonus if your salary doesnt change in a normal 4 week cycle

 

I never used to gte paid bank holidays when I worked them and others didnt because I got paid £xxk per year and any extra hours were just part of the luxury of having that particular role for which I was paid quite well. You need to look at the overall picture and if you arent losing out (other than TOIL above 1 for 1) in the new scheme it isnt worth arguing over. If you are having to work longer than others or what you did before to keep you normal holiday entitlement then that is worth taking up because the assumptions of the working day may well reduce your annual salary if they start to tinker with the hours even more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...