Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HXCPM/Gladstones claimform ANPR PCN - Overstay Lawson Rd Brighouse HD6 1NY *** Claim Dismissed Costs awarded***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

right, as you know at this time all it needs is a skeleton defence so what does the defendant intend to write?

 

get it posted up here and we will advise accordingly.

 

The main thing is not saying too much in detail at this point or you can lead yourself down a dead end road.

 

If they have failed to follow the protocols of the POFA then there is no keeper liability so stating that as the first point is OK but dont add anything to that statement, nothing about who may have been driving

, the fact you were in prison on remand at the time or anything else,

it is all irrelevant to the failure to create a keeper liability.

 

next you say that anyway there is no contract between the defendant so no breach can have possibly occurred and no basis of claim.

 

again, no need to go into detail,

there could be a number of points you want to raise later about this

but stating a simple fact is enough for the moment,

let them think about it and worry.

 

thirdly you can state that they have failed to show locus standi by not producing a copy of the agreement between then and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and to make civil claims in their own name nor have they produced evidence of the necessary planning permissions for their signage or other equipment.

 

that is more than enough for the moment.

 

yes, this can be submitted at any time up until the last date but send it too early and Gladstones will change their claim to fit in with what you have said

 

so for example if you state that the claim is for a breach of contract when it is a contractual sum they are claiming ( big difference even though it is often missed) then they will adjust the wording of their claim.

 

Likewise if you go anywhere near admission of being the driver they will tweak the claim to suit.

 

generally what they write is generis rubbish so in the Witness Statement the defendant should pick up on these points and say that they havent made it clear as to why the money is owed

 

and in what capacity they are suing the defendant as it cant be both driver and keeper it has to be one or the other and the lack of POFA complaince means they have to show evidence as to who was driving at the time.

 

all of these points arent generally enough to see off a claim on their own even if the judge uses one of them to dismiss the claim,

 

it is usually because of the weight of evidence in your favour and the other points then dont need mentioning on the record.

 

You rarely get a full list of what went wrong for the claimant because there is no need to list them all out but you include everything as you cnant afford to second guess the judge

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Ericsbrother.

 

That's all really helpful.

 

The defence is still the same as that which is posted above. I just don't know what consists of too early to submit defence?

 

Is day 28 ok or does he wait until weds?...(day 31) or even later?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not file until friday 13 th by 4pm

Day 33 from the date on the claimform which is one in the count

 

You get 28 days from service of the claimform

Service of the claimform is deemed done in 5 days

 

..28+5=33

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send it whenever you want as long as it gets there in time.

 

Too early is like last week or the week before,

they will have trouble trying to fiddle things now and anyways, they are hoping that you wont have spotted their errors and still go for trying to wind you up before the actual hearing.

 

Once they get the WS they will probably apply the brakes and slink off back into their bunker, which I believe is on the 17th fairway, next to some rabbit poo (look up their registered address to appreciate this).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant. I get an answer to my question and you both say the complete opposite. Too funny.

 

And love the rabbit joke, understood it straight away ha ha.

 

Hopefully I can leave you in peace for a few days now...but don't hold your breath!!!

 

Thank so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not really the opposite, there was only 4 days to file so by the time you had asked the question it wasnt too soon.

 

What we are trying to say is never file on day 1 as they then have a month to receive it and change their story.

 

It will be past the last date by the time your defence goes onto the system and Gladdys wont be able to muck about without paying a further fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks EB.

 

Well, quick as a flash, Gladdys have replied! No time wasting this time.....

 

17th July 2018

We Act for the Claimant and have notified the Court of our Client's intention to proceed with the claim.

 

Please find enclosed a copy of our Client's completed Directions Questionnaire, which will be filed with the court upon their request. You will note we intend to request a special direction that the case be dealt with on the papers and without the need for an oral hearing.

 

This request is sought simply because the matter is in our Client's opinion relatively straightforward and the costs incurred by both parties for attending an oral hearing would be disproportionate. We trust you agree.

 

You will note our Client has opted not to mediate. Its decision is not meant to be in any way obstructive and is based purely on experience, as mediation has rarely proven beneficial in these types of cases. Notwithstanding this, our Client would be happy to listen to any genuine payment proposals that you wish to put forward.

Yours sincerely

GS

Gladstones Solicitors

 

Does the Defendant now wait to hear from the Court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should let the court know that you need an oral hearing to cross examine their witness.

 

It is your right and all they are doing is trying to pull the wool over your and the courts eyes and often introduce evidence that you wont have seen and say things that arent true without offering you the chance of rebutting their twaddle.

 

They do this all the time but they dont knock off the £50 from their claim for the costs of attending!

 

DO NOT communicate with Gladdys on this, just let the court know you want a hearing and not have the matter decided on the papers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, sounds good to me thanks.

 

Have drafted this for him to send:

 

County Court Business Centre

4th Floor St Katherine’s House

21-27 St Katherine’s Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Dear Sirs,

 

In relation to the above claim the defendant would like to bring to your attention the Claimant’s request for a special direction to have the matter dealt with on papers and without the need for an oral hearing.

 

Today a copy of the Claimant’s Direction Questionnaire was received, in which the above intention was made. The Defendant does not consent to this and would like to make the Courts Service aware that an oral hearing is being requested to allow the Defendant to cross examine any witness the Claimant may have.

 

Not entirely sure whether the words 'defendant' need to be used in this letter but have gone with it lol. Does anything else need to be said?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shorter letter saying that you object to their demand to have ther matter decided "on the papers" and you want a proper hearing where their witnesses can be cross-examined will suffice. Dont need to tell the court that today you read your post and that you intend to go for a walk later.

 

 

 

 

 

as for defendant- read the N1 form, the claimant issues it and the defendant responds. You are the defendant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL! I was trying to pad it out a bit for him, looked like it needed a bit more text ha!

 

Re defendant bit was just unsure if the letter needed to be worded in third person.

 

Will remove life story and make it more concise.

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again!

 

Letter has been sent to court requesting an oral hearing.

 

Today the old man received a Directions Questionnaire, which he has completed.

 

On the front there is a covering letter which looks like it's addressing the Claimant....I see from other posts on this forum that this is a copy of the letter sent to the Claimant for the Defendants reference.

 

The letter asks for the questionnaire to be filed by 8th August Is that also for the Claimant? (looking on MCOL they've already filed theirs).....CUE QUESTIONS>>>>>>>

 

***Does the defendant also have to file theirs by the same date?

 

***Can this be done via email? I've seen the address somewhere on this forum but for the life in me I can't find it now!! So just to check is this correct? ( [email protected] )

 

***Is a typed signature sufficient if submitting by email?

 

***Does a copy need to be sent to Gladdys?

 

Ever grateful for your guidance :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

not cant be done by email

 

no to mediation

1 wit you

the rest is obv

 

3 copies

1 to the court

1 to gladdy's [minus sig/email/phone]

1 for your file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Morning. Just wanted to double check that the other half doesn't need to do anything with the letter he got. It reads:

 

Upon considering the the papers on the court file it is ordered that this case be transferred to the county court at xxxx and the file has been sent to that court.

If this order was made as a result of a without notice application or on the courts own initiative and if you object to the order you may make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed provided the application is made within 7 days of service of the order.

 

He's getting antsy again!

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

this means it will be heard at your local court unless the named court is not your local one. You need to do nothing, it is normal. You will soon be given a hearing date when they can look at the papers an their calendar, you usually have to swap evidence bundles a fortnight before the hearing date. Gladdys will try and offer a settlemant for a lesser amount in the hope that they dont have to get someone to turn up and be humiliated because the LAST THING THEY WANT IS AN ACTUAL HEARING.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning all!

 

We have been away a few days and have come home to court papers.

 

The claimant has until 4pm on the date of the hearing to pay the court fee or the case will be struck out.....but the hearing is at 2pm on that same day??? This doesn't make sense to me?

 

Also is now the time defendant needs to put together full defence and send copies to court and claimant?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, you get your WS written up and them phone the court to clarify the allocation fee bit. If you are using moneyclaim online you can check the dates things are supposed to eb done there and use the dashboard to whack in a strike out for non payment if the dates are showing on there differently ( ie sooner)

What is the date of the hearing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks EB have just called court and yes it is a typo. Hearing is 2nd Nov.

Will get the ball and chain to keep checking MCOL. The court have extended the date (was actually 5th Oct) to 12th Oct.

Will write up WS. Copies need to be sent to Claimant no later than 14 days before court date as I remember?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...