Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sofa damage from dog, was less than 6 weeks old when happened... insurer wants to restore !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have a contents policy with MoreThen insurance.

 

I recently purchased a new 2+3 seater recliner sofa's costing £1500 + delivery. These were delivered towards the end of March 2010.

 

In late April 2010 my partner did not close the front room door so the latch caught, but did lock the handle (privacy style handle/door lock. Usa style) and went out. The dog pushed the door open and for what ever reason has clawed the seat of one of the two seater sofas.... caught the back panel and the arm panel.

 

The seat panel has fade lines in the dye and has broken the surface of the leather (the skin).

 

The sofa's I bought are all leather with no leather match on them also.

 

 

After morethan sending out their "assessor" to take photos and messing me around for two days, he finally comes and takes photos and says "ok I will send these on to the mgt company".

 

Around two weeks later I get a call from the mgt company saying "we are just calling to check you have been contacted by the restorers to arrange an appointment"

 

To which I replied, no I have not and do not feel it can be restored to pre-damage condition. How do you restore leather that has the skin removed, which is now effectively swede ?

 

I spoke to a manager with whom I agreed that the restorers where to contact me by phone and explain how they were going to magically repair my sofa back to a natural finish.

 

Anyway, this went on and on and on with morethan saying they are entitled to repair before replace.

 

 

 

Now to my concerns, As above I do not feel that the "restorer" will actually repair the damage but HIDE it. Which in my opinion is not a repair, and not what I pay for.

How can they replace the skin of the leather panel by restoring it, this is a natural product... which I assume they will use some form of synthetic agent on it to hide the scratches.

 

 

Where do I stand on this ?

 

This last phone call happened 12 days ago, and today I get a call saying "our restorer says they can repair your sofa"

 

Thats funny, they have not even looked at it !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best advice is to go with the flow. Let the Insurers have the sofa inspected with a view to restoration. They have specialist companies that deal with this everyday, so if they cannot put back into the original condition, they will advise the Insurers. Then replacement will be the option.

 

If you kick up a fuss at this stage, it could just delay matters.

 

There are independent companies that will provide you with an other opinion, if you find it necessary at any stage. This will be at your cost.

 

My feeling on this is that they will repair the sofa's to their original condition and not need to replace.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best advice is to go with the flow. Let the Insurers have the sofa inspected with a view to restoration. They have specialist companies that deal with this everyday, so if they cannot put back into the original condition, they will advise the Insurers. Then replacement will be the option.

 

If you kick up a fuss at this stage, it could just delay matters.

 

There are independent companies that will provide you with an other opinion, if you find it necessary at any stage. This will be at your cost.

 

My feeling on this is that they will repair the sofa's to their original condition and not need to replace.

 

 

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

My concern is that the insurers will advise the restorer to repair to save costs...

The problem being, its a near brand new sofa.... and the only way to repair completely is to replace the panels... which I have been told they wouldnt do in any case, they would replace the whole sofa.

 

The fact remains of my concern, that once the skin on leather is breached you have swede ! no amount of restoration is going to replace that skin, with skin ? is it ? Never seen "real" leather skin in a bottle before :p

 

lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would have thought that they would take the sofa away to their workshop and repair it to the same condition as it was when new. Then return to your address for inspection to make sure you are happy.

 

If you are not happy, you can reject by making a complaint to the claims department. If the sofa is not in a 'as new' condition, the Insurers would have to restore it properly or pay to replace.

 

When you take apart a sofa, they are generally pretty basically constructed and parts can be replaced. The repair company will have a vast range of replacement leather material in most colours. If the panels have been damaged they will replace the wood and filling as necessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would have thought that they would take the sofa away to their workshop and repair it to the same condition as it was when new. Then return to your address for inspection to make sure you are happy.

 

If you are not happy, you can reject by making a complaint to the claims department. If the sofa is not in a 'as new' condition, the Insurers would have to restore it properly or pay to replace.

 

When you take apart a sofa, they are generally pretty basically constructed and parts can be replaced. The repair company will have a vast range of replacement leather material in most colours. If the panels have been damaged they will replace the wood and filling as necessary.

 

 

No mate, they specifically said a "in home repair"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...