Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
    • Thanks for coming back to us. There are no guarantees - but remember that so far MET have not had the guts to put even a single case before a judge.  Not once. Yours is one of seven court cases. Three ongoing like yours. In two MET bottled it as Witness Statement stage approached. In one the allocating judge decided their Particulars of Claim were rubbish and threw the case in the bin. Just the one victory by MET by default when the motorist stupidly didn't file a defence. So there is every chance that MET will throw in the towel in your case too if you stand firm. Please keep us informed of what is happening. Regarding being abroad, that is no reason for things going wrong, you can request an on-line hearing and we've had several cases where the PPC gave up when the motorist moved abroad. But please keep us in the loop.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

M&S Car Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently cancelled my direct debit for the car insurance as the vehicle has been sold and the policy is no longer required.

 

Just received a letter stating that if dd not put back in place then the policy would be cancelled, fine I thought. Called M&S to tell them that the policy was no longer required.

 

The person on the phone then said this was not a problem and that the policy was cancelled immediately, they then went through a number of figures and stated that I now owe them a large sum of money.

 

I questioned this, to which the person said we will atttempt to take it by direct debit which I said you will not, I was then told you must pay by credit or debit card again I said no, and stated that I would like to see an invoice to ascertain what these costs were.

 

My question is what are they trying to charge me for and secondly is this allowed?

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, firstly what does it say in your policy regarding cancellations?

 

Secondly, just because you were paying monthly doesn't mean that you were receiving cover on a monthly basis. It was just a way of spreading the cost of a year's policy (with added interest of course). You can't get out of a policy these days without some kind of fee being charged. Of course if it is outrageously big then I would certainly recommend kicking up a fuss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just digging out the policy docs at the moment, secondly the fee seems overly high to me.

 

Can they just take a direct debit despite it being cancelled and my telling them that I do not give them permission?

 

Also when I took the policy I knew that it potentially would not be for the year and I questioned them on this and was told not a problem and that there would not be any significant charges applied.

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cancel your policy:

 

1 month 20%

2 months 30%

3 months 40 %

4 months 50%

5 months 60%

6 months 70%

7 months 80%

8 months 90%

9 months onwards 100%

 

No claims have been made on the policy and no mention of additional charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming those figures are based on having bought the policy in full and represents how much of the total policy cost you are liable for. So if you cancelled a £200 policy for argument's sake within one month you would pay £40 so got a refund of £160.

 

It becomes more complicated when you spread the costs by DD. Going to need some figures here.

What was the cost of the policy (including any interest charges for paying by DD) and how many months into the policy have you cancelled?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I'm guessing their argument is that you would have paid them £436.85. With it being 8 months into the policy you are liable for 90% of the total cost.

 

Therefore 436.85 x 0.9 = £393.17

 

Then if I understand your payments correctly it would be:

33.07+36.78 and seven months @ £36.70 means you have paid off £326.75.

 

The difference between those two figures would be £66.42.

How much are they asking for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes correct on the number of payments made, no mention of admin charges except for the following

 

OTHER CHARGES: ADMINISTRATION FEE - If you make an underwriting change to your policy after the first 14 days, we may charge an administration fee of £25.

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's possible that they are putting an extra 25 quid on and that takes us up to 91 pounds-ish which matches the figure they are quoting you. With it all being written in the T&C it looks like they have got you there I'm afraid... :(

 

It is galling to have 67% of the cover (8 months out of 12) and pay 90% of the cost...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can certainly querry it, however in my experience, if it's written in the T&C they won't be interested in any complaints you make. Insurers are like any large financial institution, pretty vile :)

 

It's because of things like this that I rarely cancel insurance and just let it run even if I no longer need it as it often pays dividends in the form of NCB for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is to pay up, as otherwise you will come to regret it. The Insurers will count non payment as a debt like any other. After writing to you, if you did not pay, they would pass this to a debt collection agency, who would attempt to collect, adding their own fees, making the amount owed a lot higher. If you did not pay, they would add this debt to your credit record as a default. It is also possible that they could take you to court and obtain a CCJ.

 

For £91, I don't think it is worth the hassle.

 

You are of course entitled under FSA rules to ask for a full breakdown of the cancellation charges in writing, before you make payment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already asked for an invoice with a full breakdown of where these costs are coming from. I no doubt expect that this will not be what they send but I will then request in writing and until such time as they produce the breakdown I will consider the account to be in dispute.

 

A disputed account can not be passed legally to a debt collection agency and the DA will drop it like hot potato when they know the account is in dispute.

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...