Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NIP with incorrect speeding offence


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, i would greatly appreciate any advice and help with how to deal with my NIP I received yesterday.

 

I will try to give you as much information as possible

but as im new to this and its my first NIP

i may overlook something so please forgive me.

 

I was travlling at 83MPH on the A417 towards Swindon (just before it turns into the A419)

I will state now i do admit to doing this and fully accept the responsibility

but i hope i may have some luck on my side and may be able to get this overturned

 

the letter states Offence Speeding

- exceed 5/18/20/30/40/50/60mph limit for a good vehicle

- manned equipment

 

I have 3 questions regarding this;

 

1: Why have they listed all these speeds?

 

2: the speed limit on this road is 70 not 60mph, would this affect a conviction?

 

2: The letter states that the vehicle I was driving as a "goods vehicle"

however, I was in my Ford transit which is less than 3000KG,

again, would this affect a conviction?

 

having read other forums

i have seen a case where someone was let off because the speed limit was incorrect.

 

 

My question is,

due to the comments above,

is there any advice you can give to help me respond to the NIP, which may allow me to overturn the conviction?

 

Thank you all in advance

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look here: https://www.gov.uk/speed-limits

 

It states:

Vans, car-derived vans and dual-purpose vehicles

 

Most vans under 7.5 tonnes laden (loaded) weight, including Ford Transit vans:

 

  • have a lower speed limit than cars
  • must follow the speed limits for goods vehicles of the same weight

A vehicle qualifying as a ‘car-derived van’ or ‘dual-purpose vehicle’ has the same speed limits as a car.

If you are wondering whether a Transit qualifies as a 'car-derived van', look here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/car-derived-vans-and-dual-purpose-vehicles

 

The gist of which is:

Car-derived vans are designed to weigh no more than 2 tonnes when loaded and are based on car designs (eg Ford Fiesta, Vauxhall Corsa), or the vehicle is built from a platform which has been designed to be built as a car or a van.

 

So, YES, your Transit van is a goods vehicle and should not be driven at more than 60mph unless on a Motorway.

As you were travelling at more than 38% over the speed limit, expect a court date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First things first!. Were you stopped? (if so, they don't always have to serve a NIP).

 

If not, is this actually a NIP to the driver, or a combined NIP / S172 requirement to the registered keeper to identify the driver?. When was the alleged offence?

When was the NIP/s172 posted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the identity of the driver is not in any doubt

(such as if it is your personal work van, and no-one else could have been driving, or you can be expected to know who was driving if you 'exercise due dilligence') ;

you are going to have to identify yourself as the driver.

 

 

Failure to do so will mean a prosecution for failing to identify,

which will be 6 points (unless the vehicle is registered to a Ltd company, where a Ltd company can't be given points) and a Band C fine.

 

IF you are found guilty of speeding (84 in a 60),

the starting point for penalty will be a band B fine

and (4-6 points OR disqualification for 7-28 days).

 

So,

not only because the site doesn't allow me to suggest someone breaks the law!,

but also because in almost all circumstances it is better to identify the driver and risk being prosecuted for speeding than to take the penalty for NOT identifying the driver :

you are best to identify the driver,

if it is clear who was driving.

 

If the letter was dated the 16th December,

and you have it already,

it was sent the 16th?.

When was the alleged offence?.

 

if before the 3rd December,

that is highly relevant (the initial NIP/s172 must be sent with 14 days in most circumstances; subsequent NIPs to the driver don't have this procedural requirement).

Link to post
Share on other sites

just remember also that where there is no fence or crash barrier

then the speed limit on a dual carriageway is 60MPH

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just remember also that where there is no fence or crash barrier

then the speed limit on a dual carriageway is 60MPH

 

It would be 70mph for cars, but the OP was restricted to 60mph as at was a Goods Vehicle. A Dual Carriageway only needs a central reservation - no mention of fence or crash barrier - sch.6, Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, YES, your Transit van is a goods vehicle and should not be driven at more than 60mph unless on a Motorway.

As you were travelling at more than 38% over the speed limit, expect a court date.

No reason to expect a court date. Anything up to 85mph in a 60 limit would normally be dealt with by a fixed penalty (I've 3 points and £100).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...