Jump to content


friend cannot decide who was driving - nominates dad - dad renominates him! - getting to 6mts limit now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

‘Prosecution can only occur from 6 months from offence date’

so if the driver is identified post that period, what would happen in that case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prosecution for the underlying offence (e.g. speeding) cannot take place. However, the offence of "failing to provide driver's details" does not occur until 28 days after the request is served. There are some exceptions to this. As above, tell us what happened (with dates) and we can advise properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s actually not for me. It’s actually for a friend who cannot decide who was driving at time of offence so he nominates his dad then his dad renominates him. This is nearly reaching 6 months from offence date. So he was wondering what happens post that date if anyone of them were to admit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moseet said:

...so he nominates his dad then his dad renominates him.

That's not a good idea.

At least one of them (and possibly both) will be prosecuted for "Failing to provide driver's details" (FtP). Upon conviction the offence carries six points, a hefty fine and an endorsement code (MS90) which insurers really hate. An MS90 endorsement will see the premiums at least double (and probably more than that) in the first year and will see considerably increased premiums for up to five years.

Quote

...a friend who cannot decide who was driving at time of offence

The required process is not to "decide" who was driving but to identify who was. There is a defence to the  FtP charge if the recipient can show that "...he did not know and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained who the driver of the vehicle was.". It is a tough hurdle to clear and will involve convincing a court that all reasonable steps have been taken to establish who the driver was. So what have they done, so far, to establish that?

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to friend cannot decide who was driving - nominates dad - dad renominates him! - getting to 6mts limit now?

If your "friend" and his dad don't stop messing about trying to avoid a piddling speeding fine they might both end up like these two...

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Former cabinet minister Chris Huhne and his ex-wife Vicky Pryce are each jailed for eight months for perverting the course of justice over a driving...

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...