That's really helpful, thank you. 14 days is well expired now, that will make him feel happier. If he does happen to get another one come through we will comply with the request for details and I will post again here . Cheers all.

Thanks for the helpful replies. BY way of update : he sent back both the NIPs, and we did (almost) as Tony P suggested later - sent a covering later identifying him as the driver at the time and date identified. He also however said he was on the M1 at that time , and so with regard to the NIP that placed him elsewhere he admitted only to being the driver at that time but not to being at the location. He stated he felt that an error had clearly been made and denied being on the other motorway at any time. We had no idea whether anyone would even read it...... Within a couple of days he received an offer of a speed awareness course for the M1 offence and a covering note to say that they agreed an error had been made. They said the second NIP would be cancelled and a replacement may be sent out - I guess it's possible we hear something else. He swiftly accepted the offer of the course and has paid for and booked it. Nothing else received so far. He is still 100% certain that he didnt travel on the second alleged route at any point, Still crossing fingers. His driving has been more considered since - at least when I've been present anyway.

very much appreciated, cheers

He says not. All about the privacy settings apparently. But surely he can't be guilty of being in two places at the same time ?

The car has factory fitted sat nav which he would have been following. I'm not certain what info that stores . he doesn't have a dash cam .

The M1 one is southbound between J41 and 40, the other one is "M606 southbound near slip, marker post 1.0, Bradford" He left a place just north of M62 in Tingley, got on the M62 heading east and onto the M1, shortly after which he was seen on the M1 camera. The time for that ties in with his departure time . So fair cop. The M606 joins the M62 west of where he started from , and he didnt go that way - there's no conceivable reason for him to be going south on the M606 starting from where he did. And as I noted, the times / dates and speeds are identical for the two incidents.

Yes, he's following the thread and will be responding to all the necessary police stuff himself. He just panicked ! He's got 28 days from 25th of Feb to respond. We would have given details for the first one already if we could have logged on to do it - will try again later in case its just the site thats down. Just not sure how to respond to the second one.

Thanks for the response, I know what you mean, but he's not out to play the system (and I wouldnt encourage him to) - he's happy to accept the M1 offence but is bricking it about the accusation of 82 in a 50 which he is certain is an error. For background, he's 25 , 7.5 years driving , no endorsements and still comes to Dad when things go wrong

Yes, he accepts he is likely to have done 82 on the M1. He is happy to take what he's due for that . No he definitely was not on the other motorway at any time - he was making a specific journey home from a place he has never been before (its not a road he would have used ever ) and its not in the same direction as the route he took to get on the M1 - he's certain that wasnt him. I thought cloned plate also but it seems weird it is recorded at same time exactly and at exactly same speed - they aren't stretches of the same motorway but two completely different roads, It looks like a procedural error to me but not sure how to reply , especially as we can't see the photo evidence due to not being able to get onto the portal. Thanks for the advice so far, will await further input .

My son has just received two letters with Notice of Intended prosecution for speed camera offences. First is almost certainly a fair cop - 82 in a 70, on the M1 which was on his route he took that day. Second is on a different motorway , about 15 miles away, again 82 but in a variable speed zone which was at 50 at the time - this was NOT on his route, and for good measure the two notices give the time and date of the incident as exactly the same - to the minute, and the speed is also exactly the same. We are unable to use the details provided for either alleged offence to log into the portal to give driver details or to view the image they referred to - just says "unable to login , check your details". We will ring the number provided tomorrow but anyone had this before or got any advice on how easy or otherwise it will be to get them to see this is clearly not possible? I foresee a wall of red tape ..... Cheers for any advice.