Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Banding help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, any advice greatly appreciated.

 

I purchased my house a couple of years ago and was surprised at how high my banding was, Band E, due to the fact that I did not move into the property for a few months after purchase I did not really follow this up. But after deciding to take control of my life recently and being sick to the teeth of being ripped off I decided to look into the matter.

 

So after some research, I have found out that I am the only property in my road and there are a few houses in my road, which is a band E! The majority are a Band C with the rest being band D. I also have carried out an estimate of the property value of my house in 1991, which the estimate says would be in Band C.

 

So I called the valuation office to say that I would like to appeal against my banding. Low and behold they said that as I had not appealed within six months of purchasing the property they was nothing they could do. So I called again hoping that I would be able to speak to someone else, which I did. They were slightly more helpful, but I was told as there really is not another property to compare with in my street it would be almost impossible to re calculate and that I would need to do more research maybe by calling Estate Agents nearby to find a property similar to mine. Surely this cannot be right, why do I have to do all work.

 

The property next door to me is the same expect it is slightly smaller but is on a bigger plot of land and the Guy at the Valuation office said that the properties could not be compared on the basis my house is bigger or has an extra bedroom!

 

Any advice on how to challenge this would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Greasmonkey,

 

Thank you for your reply, there are three other properties in my road that are detached bungalows, all the rest are semi detached houses. My next door neighbour is in a detached bungalow and whilst their property is slightly smaller their plot of land is larger and they are a band D. There is also two other detached bungalows again they are slightly smaller and are band C. The person I spoke with at the VOA said that there was not another property to do a compassion with, which I think is a joke. I have done a valuation on my property which I do understand is only a rough guide but never the less the valuation in 1991 would put my property in Band C. Due to where I live it would be almost impossible to compare with another property close by as my road is behind a Motorway.

 

I truly believe that I do have a case but do not feel why I have to justify the banding. I find it difficult to believe that no one at te VOA seem to have a clue. But I will be taking this all the way. Any more advice will be greatly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi there

 

I've just been looking into my council tax banding as well and find that my cottage is a Band B....and it's only a one bedroom property, on the road with no front garden but a small back garden..but open outlook. A cottage 2 doors along which is the same size as mine is Band C....and other 1 bedroom properties in the village are band A. There seems to be no rhyme nor reason for the banding so I'm going to appeal mines too. It might be worth going to your local councillor to ask for advice.

 

Gemspan xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The VOA is correct in saying legally you have no right of appeal, however they will review your band if you ask them to. Depends who you speak to on the phone. You will need to write to them giving them a good reason to look into your band. It is based on how much your property would have sold for on the open market in a resonable state of repair in April 1991 (England) April 2003 (Wales). They wont take into consideration the plot, only the house/bungalow etc. If you look at http://www.nethouseprices.com/ this will give you sold prices in your area at the time you want. You need to find something similar to your own ie roughly the same size and would sell for roughly the same price if both were on the market. A detatched 2 bed bungalow is going to be worth the same as a slightly larger semi detached 2 bed bungalow. A bungalow is unfortunatly usually worth more than a house (there are less of them so due to supply and demand, bungalows fetch more). If you do not want to look up anything or do any work, a little trick I've found to work is to write to your MP and get them to ask them to look into the banding for you.

Band D - 68,001 to 88,000

Band E - 88,001 to 120,000

If you want to be a band D you will have to find sales which shows that your house would be the same price as the others in 1991. You can also do this by seeing what value your property is now, and comparing it to another one on your street that is for sale now, if they are roughly the same now, then they would have been roughly the same then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...