Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
    • Danny - point taken about the blue paragraphs.  Including them doesn't harm your case in any way.  It makes no odds.  It's just that over the years we've had judges often remarking on how concise & clear Caggers' WSs have been compared to the Encyclopaedia Britannica-length rubbish that the PPCs send, so I always have a slight preference to cut out anything necessary. Don't send off the WS straight away .. you have plenty of time ... and let's just say that LFI is the Contract King so give him a couple of days to look through it with a fine-tooth comb.
    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CAG CRA S.A.R Club


sosumi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is directly quoted from the Information Commissioner's Office here:

Dear Sir or Madam

Please send me the information which I am entitled to under the Section 7(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998.

If you need further information from me, or a fee, please let me know as soon as possible.

If you do not normally handle these requests for your organisation, please pass this letter to your Data protection officer or another appropriate official.

Yours faithfully

 

Could it be that simple?:)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This is from the jargon buster on Data Sharing and Protection, from the Ministry of Justice:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/data_sharing_jargon_buster.pdf

Personal data/information

Information relating to a living individual, from which that individual can be identified, or which can be used to identify a living individual in conjunction with other information held, (or likely to be held) by a data controller. Personal data/information includes expressions of opinions about that person, or indications of intent towards them.

Principles

The Data Protection Act 1998 requires that data controllers process personal data in accordance with eight Principles. These require that personal data are:

• fairly and lawfully processed;

• processed for limited purposes;

• adequate, relevant and not excessive;

• accurate;

• not kept longer than necessary;

• processed in accordance with individuals' rights;

• kept secure;

• not transferred to countries outside the European Economic Area without adequate protection.

Processing

The processing of personal data includes obtaining, recording, holding or carrying out any operation on the data.

Subject access

The right of data subjects to receive a copy of the information held about them, a description of why their information is being processed, and details of anyone who may see a copy of their data, to whom it may

be transferred, and the logic involved in any automated decisions taken on the basis of that data.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

... and here's the Data Protection Act Directgov webpage:

The Data Protection Act : Directgov - Rights and responsibilities

The Data Protection Act

 

The Data Protection Act regulates how your personal information is used and protects you from misuse of your personal details.

 

It provides a common-sense set of rules which prohibit the misuse of your personal information without stopping it being used for legitimate or beneficial purposes.

The details of the Data Protection Act are quite complex, but at the heart of it are eight common-sense rules known as the Data Protection Principles.

These require personal information to be:

  • fairly and lawfully processed;
  • processed for limited purposes;
  • adequate, relevant and not excessive;
  • accurate;
  • not kept longer than necessary;
  • processed in accordance with your rights;
  • kept secure;
  • not transferred abroad without adequate protection.

 

Organisations using personal information ('data controllers') must comply with these Principles.

The Act provides stronger protection for sensitive information about your ethnic origins, political opinions, religious beliefs, trade union membership, health, sexual life and any criminal history.

 

Getting access to your information

 

The Act, with some exceptions, gives you the right to find out what information is held about you by organisations. This is known as the 'right of subject access'. On written request, you are entitled to be supplied with a copy of all the information an organisations holds about you.

 

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm not sure about that letter sosumi.

I was thinking more along these lines.

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

Dear Sir/Madam

DATA SUBJECT: **Your Name and Address**

 

Please supply me with a complete breakdown and copies of all information held with your organisation.

 

Also details for every organisation that has accessed my data for the period which you hold records and any supporting documentation and notes.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which I normally use.

 

Please consider this a request under section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998. I enclose the statutory fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

 

Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter.

I would appreciate your due diligence.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

That should cover it.

Also you'll have to sign this one, but do it in such a way as to make photoshop specials impossible.

Normally I sign on a printed line like this; #_________*__________#

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like this CB?:

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

Date: 3-9-2007

Dear Sir/Madam

DATA SUBJECT:

Sosumi, Sosumi’s Address

(Maiden Name – Miss Sosumi)

 

 

Please supply me with a complete breakdown and copies of all information held with your organisation.

 

Also details for every organisation that has accessed my data for the period which you hold records and any supporting documentation and notes.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which I normally use.

 

Please consider this a request under section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998. I enclose the statutory fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

 

Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

________________

 

Sosumi

- Thought I'd add my maiden name, as they already have it. What about hubby's name, as they put him down on my credit report, ie. we're both obviously associated to each other.. that's why I'm wondering?

Yours is much better. :) I was drafting mine with ref. to the 8 data protection principles! :D I suspect that might be for later though? ;)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anybody seen this?:

CreditExpert Affiliate Programme

CreditExpert affiliate programme

 

Calling all websites! Make money by joining the CreditExpert affiliate programme. Whether you have a large or small site, your users can benefit from the CreditExpert product while at the same time generating you revenue. We provide you with a wide variety of creative; all you need is the traffic.

We will pay you for every FREE trial member that you generate, regardless if they cancel at the end of their trial. Since launching in 2004, we’ve gained thousands of members through our affiliate programme with many of our publishers generating serious money every week.

What’s more, credit-reporting services in the US are proven to be the best affiliate programmes. Here in the UK we have a great range of partners, from major portals to specialist financial sites.

Some key questions:

  • What’s in it for you?
  • For every ‘free trial member’ you generate CreditExpert will pay you a commission, regardless of any cancellations

  • What sites does CreditExpert work well on?
  • Financial, advice, loans, mortgage, and credit card sites
  • Property and car sites
  • Rewards and incentive sites
  • Shopping sites
  • Information and advice sites

  • What types of people want this product?
  • People who are applying for financial products
  • People who are concerned about their credit history
  • People who want to check that their information is correct
  • People who want to protect themselves from identity fraud - the UK’s fastest growing crime

  • Where can you target these members?
  • Generic websites - CreditExpert appeals to anyone who is concerned about their credit status
  • Before an application - are your users thinking about credit cards, mortgages or loans? If so they will be credit checked. Don’t let them be denied due to incorrect information, get them to check their credit report for free
  • After an application - have your users been refused credit? Let them check their credit report for free

  • Remember:
  • CreditExpert complements other financial products as it can play an important step in helping a customer get a loan, mortgage or credit card. Anyone with a valid credit card and UK address can join

So what are you waiting for? Click on the below link and enjoy the benefits of promoting CreditExpert

- So that'll be why the advert's everywhere then :evil:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

do we need to send one to all three of the main CRA's, or are we just focusing on the one we are signed up with?

I'm eventually going to send one to all 3 (and the Land Registry!), but am going to have to space it out because of the cost Lolly. And Experian - one of their chief executives is going to host a 'focus group' at a big swish conference for debt collectors in September, about how they can access all our information.

Strikes me they're touting for business from consumers one way, providing it to debt collectors the other. So yes, I have to spend this tenner as wisely as I can, and I think they should be first on the list.:evil:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i cant remember where i saw it, but also somebody posted a link to the annual debt collection award ceremony! these people sit around in posh outfits, eating a fancy dinner, congratulating each other about how many results they have had over the past year! the best part about it is, one of the panel is the chairman of the CCCS! anybody else feeling a little sickened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sosumi

 

Just read this bit from the Affiliate Programme info you posted in post #32

For every ‘free trial member’ you generate CreditExpert will pay you a commission, regardless of any cancellations

Think I will ask them for my "commission" then;) - I initially recommended CAGers to sign up for their credit report as it was FREE

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sosumi

 

Just read this bit from the Affiliate Programme info you posted in post #32

 

For every ‘free trial member’ you generate CreditExpert will pay you a commission, regardless of any cancellations

 

Think I will ask them for my "commission" then;) - I initially recommended CAGers to sign up for their credit report as it was FREE

 

Yes BO, but why wouldn't you? You thought what most of us thought! :) xx

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, CB, didn't mean to duplicate your post, was going to add - but then decided against it.

I've got my Credit Report here. It lists 'Financial Associations' - obviously it's my hubby, so if I ask for a SAR with the above letter they'll enclose everything in the Credit Report and then everything else as well? I just don't want to miss anything out! :)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like our fiends (sic) at Experian are going to very busy dealing with SARS over the next couple of weeks. Just think if every member of CAG applied at once for what we are LEGALLY entitled to do. They may not have time to pass on all the information to all their mates in the DCAs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I'm going to send this. I've changed it a bit, as I can refer to my printed CRF, but essentially it's CB's letter:

Post doesn't leave here until late afternoon, so if anyone sees any mistakes etc, please let me know? :)

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

Date: 3-9-2007

Dear Sir/Madam

DATA SUBJECT:

Sosumi, Sosumi’s Address

 

Please supply me with a complete breakdown and copies of all information held with your organisation.

 

Also details for every organisation that has accessed my data for the period which you hold records and any supporting documentation and notes.

 

Please consider this a request under section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998. I enclose the statutory fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

 

I previously subscribed to CreditExpert, and also requested a hard copy of my credit file from you, which you provided dated 23rd August 2007, ref: ********/**. You should therefore have all the details you require from me, but please let me know by return if you require any other specific information.

 

Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

_____________ (signature above line as per CB's suggestion)

 

Sosumi

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a grave and genuine concern with the lack of diligence shown by CRAs when blindly accepting the word of a DCA.

 

I believe that a DCA should be required to provide proof, in the form of a signed executed agreement, that a debt exists before the CRA would even entertain the thought of recording a default on a person's file.

 

When an ordinary pleb like me complains to the CRA about an incorrect entry, we're told to speak to the DCA - who of course are as much use as a bottle of factor 4 suncream on the surface of Mercury.

 

It's a very one-sided arrangement, and it's starting to come to light just how cosy the relationship between the CRAs and DCAs really is.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

so have i got this right? the CRA's help the DCAs by passing on our information, and the debt counsellors have been patting the DCAs on the back for a job well done! its no wonder the DCAs have been running riot, the people who are supposed to be helping us, the consumers, are actually helping them, the debt collectors, in the background. we havent stood a chance!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so have i got this right?

Nail on the head, sadly.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...