Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Allied International Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What is the date of the hearing? Have you had separate directions for complying with before the hearing? Have you had the Notice of Hearing from the Court, as it should contain those directions?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 267
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Car, it is a notice of hearing for late september without giving too much away.

 

It is titled notice of the defendants application to strike out claim.

 

all it does is give date and time with 30mins allocated to hear my application to strike out.

 

as you know I wrote this letter requesting strike out when lloyds did not comply with previous directions, then their bundle turned up later and the court wrote staying the claim but this crossed in the post due to their court backlog if that makes sense.

 

i have to go out now but will check on return and answer any questions you might have

 

Thanks a lot a lot for looking in

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me, I can't remember the whole thread in detail nor do I have time to go back over it now...

 

What you will need to do, if you haven't already done it as part of that letter, is write to all parties providing everything you want to rely on in your application to strike the claim out - that will include, presumably, your defence and any witness statements and any reasons why the claim should be struck out. If you have exhibits you can rely on, include them too.

 

Once they have those, the other side generally has 14 days before the hearing date to respond. They probably will. Once you have their response, you can reply to the response, (this does get a bit complicated...) but would need to do so 7 days before the hearing, so the Court can review it on the day.

 

Be aware, though, that, generally, the Court won't want to stike the claim out unless it clearly has no chance of being successful. "A clear change of no success" would be, for example, that you didn't hold an account with them and they have the wrong person. The fact they haven't provided what you've asked for does not mean that they do not have a clear chance of success. (No matter how hard we wish it would!) What you will need to do, then, (because it's unlikely the Court would strike out) is to consider what you want to get out of it - going in with a "Plan B" is good. Asking for "unless directions" that they must comply with within 14 days or the claim will be struck out is more likely to happen than having the claim struck out completely at the hearing, for example.

 

You've plenty of time to prepare, so use it wisely - it may seem like ages away, but the more prepared you are the better you will feel when it comes around. The other thing to think about is that the other side will not spend as long preparing as you will, so the more prepared you are, the more effective you will be on the day.

 

;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks car

 

hmmm ..... seems like I have some thinking to do

 

i guess that even if the court did feel there was a case to answer it should be stayed again pending the oft determination which was their original direction

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, while I have pondering my defence for the overdraft hearing in a couple of months time I have received a letter from SC&M regarding my lloyds credit card. As you know they have not been able to produce the agreement and I have a letter saying they do not hold such due to Data Protection Act (ie reasonable amount of time).

 

I have been asking for the credit card agreement since august last year.

 

Anyway I send the AQ with a template from this site off a few weeks ago and it seems to have upset them by the tone of the letter. I am not sure its a good idea to post the whole thing as they may figure our who I am.

 

To summarise: (in my words

 

 

  1. they maintain that the small claims court is not the correct place to hear this because the alleged debt is a long way over £5k and the issues raised are not straightforward.
  2. they have written to the court requesting Fast Track.
  3. They enclose what they say is the credit card agreement and other docs (statements).
  4. They go on to say that they do not believe at this stage that i am entitled to see copies of any other docs they intend to reply upon. They hide behind CPR and claim special provisions on disclosure may be relevant dep on track allocation and feel it would not be right to order production at this stage of litigation.
  5. They go on to say that my "unless" order was inappropriate in absence of a previous breach and site precedent.

they then state

 

in the meantime and to avoid any doubt under s78 here is copy credit card agreement.

 

they have now enclosed a copy of what they say is agreement

 

It is titled

 

Asset Gold Application for ????? Agreement

if your application is accepted etc .................

Credit Agreement Regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

 

this is followed by the personal details you would expect on an application.

 

above the signature box it says

"i apply for the asset gold card on the conditions overleaf"

 

the signature box has my signature and it also says in small bold text

 

"this is a credit card agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974. sign only if you wish to be bound by its terms"

 

a right to cancel box follows (saying this will be follow by post)

 

on the reverse are the t&cs which i need to review in detail.

 

what i dont understand is, if they are certain the agreement is excecuted why dont they just say that it is valid under s78 or do they wish to make example of me in fast track and why did they say they did have it, take so long.

 

Is it because it does no comply? I will look at the prescribed terms but would appreciate any immediate views.

 

Also waiting for judge to rule the AQ and S,C & M have only just got in the 14 days again.

 

Help, have I still got a defence?

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok had a quick look at the agreement and as far as i can tell it does comply although it is hard to read all the t&cs.

 

the copy is double sided with t&c on back but i would expect to see a duplex photocopy if the t&C were originally on the back. As it is I am beginning to suspect that what I have got is a copy where the first page has been copied and then turned over put back in the copier and then t&cs copied to the other side. However, If was putting this in the feeder as a duplex copy I would have expected truer and more refined edges/borders instead of a skee whif copy if u know what i mean, or am i grasping at straws here.

 

i will try and scan up if i can get working but it is not great copy and this first time for scanner/setup.

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, need a usb cable for my scanner.

 

in the meantime i have found the following and it seems that there is some suspicion that t&c s on the reverse are dodgy.

 

However, what MBNA have sent him is obviously an application form which is a pre-contractual document and void under s59 of the CCA 1974. It does not comply with the requirements of s61(1) for an executed agreement, namely that it should have the borrowers name, full postal address and the terms pescribed in schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 all on the same sheet of paper (back to back won't do), and therefore cannot be enforced by a court by virtue of s127(3) of the Act.

 

also i notice on that copy provided plus the statement from lloyds quote the original card number, whereas the claim/correspondence quotes a newer card number.

 

Taking this one step further i suspect this would have been when chip/pin was introduced hence new card which presumerably would been issued with new t&cs at the time.

 

now will this claim be allowed to proceed if the card number/acc number is different on the mcol/claim to that provided as evidence/agreement even though statements of the new card seem to used as evidence as well.

 

in any event i was not sent anything to sign at that time (pre 2006 ) so i wonder if this would have any bearing on the matter. would there be a requirement under s85 for example, i have ready seen on other threads.

 

laterz

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes you wonder why they don't want to fully disclose the documents they intend to rely on, doesn't it? Surely they have a duty to avoid the Court claim by disclosure beforehand? Me thinks they have something to hide.

 

Does the agreement have the prescribed terms on it? That's Credit limit, interest rate and payments, for a Credit Card.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first page makes ref to the t&c on the back page and as far as i can tell it does contain the PS.

 

However, other threads seem to think that the PS have in one complete document and whether the reverse t&c is enforceable seems to rely on the courts intrepretation of "four corners" etc.

 

I am not confident that the back page is what was on the back of the application and it clearly states "application" in big letter and "if accepted" so to me that says "not executed".

 

Surely it cant be "excecuted" if my "application for credit" has not been formally accepted.

 

I agree that "non discloure" is a little odd so maybe I will just write and ask a direct questiion "do you have the original" and will you provide this when we go to court?

 

Also why did they not send copy when requested in my previous requests, why did they admit they did not have the agreement/application, why did they not find it when I S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'d them a few months ago under CPR

 

I will try and sort out my scanner.

Edited by speedtrip
CLARITY

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful with the document argument - the document can contain more than one page, so the application (which we know can be enforced if it contains the prescribed terms and has been signed by the debtor) can refer to the T&C's, which should then contain the prescribed terms.

 

Only if the prescribed terms were contained in another document, (for example, "see the accompanying terms and conditions booklet for further details") could you argue the terms aren't part of the same document.

 

All in all, the Court will decide if the terms are in the document - in this case, unless you can clearly show they aren't, they probably would make that decision, IMHO.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

must say I feel a bit in over my head right now and really need to sit down and see what my options are.

 

Coming up with what they maintain is the agreement at this late stage is really poor show and after so many requests which include a SAR and they admitting they did not have the original as they do not hold documents going back this far I really thought I had a strong case.

 

I intend to get may scanner going, and post the relevant correspondence up here for all to see and study including the alleged agreement they hold.

 

One question in the meantime, given it appears that they intend to reply upon the alleged agreement, would i be able to see this in a pre court hearing, and if I have to wait until court, ie fastrack would a copy agreement be accepted by the court.

 

I really thought it would be case of "no cca, no enforcement" given the last 12 months of no cca being produced and this would give me time to get my life back together, as I had always intended to repay it but on my own terms.

 

Your s bloody annoyed:mad:

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Coming up with what they maintain is the agreement at this late stage is really poor show and after so many requests which include a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and they admitting they did not have the original as they do not hold documents going back this far I really thought I had a strong case.

 

I intend to get may scanner going, and post the relevant correspondence up here for all to see and study including the alleged agreement they hold.

 

One question in the meantime, given it appears that they intend to reply upon the alleged agreement, would i be able to see this in a pre court hearing, and if I have to wait until court, ie fastrack would a copy agreement be accepted by the court.

 

 

Could there not be some argument in this. If they have previously said they did not have an original, how could they suddenly produce a copy of it ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly .... except these people always use the words application so makes me wonder! but it was in response to mt cca request so......?

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

One question in the meantime, given it appears that they intend to reply upon the alleged agreement, would i be able to see this in a pre court hearing, and if I have to wait until court, ie fastrack would a copy agreement be accepted by the court.

 

They should disclose the agreement as part of standard disclosure once the Court has given directions.

 

Have they provide you with a copy of the agreement? If not, you could trump them and ask them to make arrangements for you to visit their Head Office, or a branch local to you, so you can see the alleged agreement, if you really want to push it with them.

 

I really thought it would be case of "no cca, no enforcement" given the last 12 months of no cca being produced and this would give me time to get my life back together, as I had always intended to repay it but on my own terms.

 

It's true they can't enforce, but only while in default of the request. You're suffering because of their late reply - but that doesn't mean that they can't enforce the agreement now they (allegedly!) have found it.

 

Could there not be some argument in this. If they have previously said they did not have an original, how could they suddenly produce a copy of it ?

 

exactly .... except these people always use the words application so makes me wonder! but it was in response to mt cca request so......?

 

I think you're confused over the requirements to have evidence of the agreement. The Act doesn't state that the original should be available to allow enforcement. In all truth, the Court will see a certified copy of the original as being as good as the original document, so will allow enforcement. I know that CPR requires disclosure of the original contract, for claims based on written agreements, but realistically, you can't rely on that in Court to avoid enforcement. Equitable justice would have to prevail, in that the Court has evidence of the original agreement, so one must exist therefore, IMHO.

 

What you need to do is address the improper execution of the agreement, if that exists. If the agreement is properly executed, there's always the possibility of going for a Tomlin/Consent Order, offering to pay a fixed amount until the debt is cleared, (and would mean the Court freezes interest and charges, also, so long as you comply with the Consent Order) but we shouldn't even discuss that until we've seen the agreement they intend to rely on, IMHO.

 

This isn't good news, but you shouldn't give up the fight just yet - they may have pulled a stinging blow by providing the agreement at this late stage, but that doesn't mean you can't still achieve what you want out of all this just yet.

 

;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Re: Alleged Credit Card Agreement

 

This is my first time using photobucket so please bear with me and it has taken me ages trouble shooting scanner to get it working;

 

 

creditcardagreementp1.png

 

 

 

creditcardagreementp2.png

 

 

I would appreciate views on whether this would meet the criteria for prescribed terms.

 

Regards,

 

ST

Edited by speedtrip
PRINT QUALITY

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Alleged Credit Card Agreement

 

 

I send several letters to AIC/SC&M/Lloyds and they eventually replied with this letter stating they do not hold records back this far.

 

What are you views on this now they are saying they do have it

 

BTW this letter was received last year way before they apparently they found the alleged "agreement" in previous post.

noccaletter51107.png

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Alleged Credit Card Agreement

 

Please find attached letter from court re notice of fastrack. Would appreciate some advice here esp the significance of points 2 - 5.

 

Please read in conjunction with second letter from court which arrived a few days later.

 

courtletterallocationtofastrack.png

 

 

 

noticeoftrialdate.png

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ST

 

Point 2 means you have to supply a list of all documents you intend to rely on in court. Details are give in CPR Part 31 and its Practice Directions

 

Point 5 means you have to provide a witness statement which gives all the facts of the case as you see them. It reiterates the factual part of your defence - anything about the copy of the agreement you have been sent, for example

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steven, can you advise further;

 

i will look at the links closer but what should go into this list?

 

most of the documents i have are ones they have sent me, i.e until recently claiming they did not have the cca, either directly or indirectly through their DCA.

 

Also I part of their file stated in their remarks between departments they did not have the CCA.

 

The only evidence is a letter saying they do not have cca, letters requesting cca over 12 month period,

 

and or course the legislation, due to credit card charges the default notice is could be inaccurate.

 

Also what is your view re PS on the documents i have attached?

 

I really need some help here to put into context for me and it needs to be posted by 12/8

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to disclose legislation or setteld cases. If you are going to rely on the CCA they sent even to rubbish it, you can disclose it (though I don't think you need to). Otherwise you may have nothing, in which case just write and say you have nothing to disclose.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Alleged Credit Card Agreement

 

 

I send several letters to AIC/SC&M/Lloyds and they eventually replied with this letter stating they do not hold records back this far.

 

What are you views on this now they are saying they do have it

 

 

They have to keep it for 6 years after the account is closed.

Data protection has nothing to do with it - they lost it & were trying to cover their tracks with bs

 

Now that they have found this, it might be the time to ask them what else they have uncovered during their searches that might be helpful to your court case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speed, I dont know whether this post by BRW and the following post by PeterBard will be of any use to you. Just in case, I screwed up and the link doesnt take you there.. it is post 12210. :)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/33174-consumer-credit-act-agreements-611.html#post1650001

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven and Grumpy thanks for your comments.

 

I found the following statement from CPR 16 7.3 and there are some posts on this subject on the thread Steven put up.

 

Now ideally, I would like to see the original in a hearing prior to going to court as only can i fully assess my defence as i do have doubts above the document.

 

Also if you look at CARs last post he says that a certified copy agreement would probably satisfy the sitting judge so this sounds like if a go to court (Fastrack) I am risking an awful lot and would need very clear and sound arguments.

 

I think you're confused over the requirements to have evidence of the agreement. The Act doesn't state that the original should be available to allow enforcement. In all truth, the Court will see a certified copy of the original as being as good as the original document, so will allow enforcement. I know that CPR requires disclosure of the original contract, for claims based on written agreements, but realistically, you can't rely on that in Court to avoid enforcement. Equitable justice would have to prevail, in that the Court has evidence of the original agreement, so one must exist therefore, IMHO.

 

Is the following a strong argument and could I make an application to the court for a pre hearing to establish the existence of the original agreement before going to court.?

 

7.3 Where a claim is based upon a written agreement:

(1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing, and

(2) any general conditions of sale incorporated in the contract should also be attached (but where the contract is or the documents constituting the agreement are bulky this practice direction is complied with by attaching or serving only the relevant parts of the contract or documents).

RBS/Triton - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Moorcroft - Gone way No CCA

RBS/AIC - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Intrum - Gone Away No CCA

RBS/Regal - Gone Away

 

Cahoot/Link - CCA in Dispute

 

Capital One - Settled

 

Lloyds Bank - Awaiting Outcome from Supreme Court Hearing.

 

Lloyds Credit Credit - Repayment Plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...