Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall - letter of unknown debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a letter from Mackenzie Hall stating that myself and black horse finance have an outstanding debt. I have never heard of them before and I certainly do not have any outstanding debts to my name. The letter requests you fill out your bank account details and return to them!!

I have no knowledge of any debt and as an individual have never been in debt.

I have called Black Horse who have no record of me or record of any debt, as they indeed shouldn't have.

I then contacted the police as I believed the letter to be a [problem].

I have then contacted Mackenzie Hall, to which they requested my date of birth, I stated I did not want to give them any more information as I don't know who they are or what this is all about, I just wanted to inform them that I believe they have sent this letter incorrectly. To which she replied I cannot deal with this case unless you give me your date of birth. I am not giving this information out!

I am most concerned that my impeccable credit history is going to be black marked due to a mistake and wish to get this ironed out as soon as possible. I have called citizens advice and they recommended I write to the person allocated to the company on the CSA website, stating that I have no record of the debt or the company associated with the debt and I want to be removed from their records immediately. I am writing this letter today..

I have looked at various posts but these all seem to indicate people with an actual debt. I have not got a debt, full stop never have, never will.

Also all the posts just state this initial stage and I cannot see any info from anyone who has actually written to them and what the outcome is... as I have said before I have no debt and therefore want to make sure I don't get blacklisted as part of a mistake.

Any feedback would be gratefully read!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome.

 

It's a common problem, sadly. Some debt collection agencies (DCAs) buy debts in bulk without the proper paperwork then go fishing to find the correct people. Chances are there's someone in your town with a similar name who they're trying to find.

 

The onus is on them to prove that you DO owe money, not the other way round. However, it will be easier and quicker to get them off your back as once they've got a sniff of you they won't give in without a fight.

 

Never call them, always write. Ensure you include "I do not acknowledge any debt" in your letter, send it recorded delivery and tell them in no uncertain terms that you are not the person they're looking for. You don't need to send any proof, but if you want to send a copy of say your driving licence be sure to render the signature uncopyable. If "uncopyable" is a word.

 

If they continue to persue you, get trading standards involved.

 

Hope that helps.

 

:)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS. It might also be worth requesting a copy of your credit record from Experian or Equifax to double check they haven't entered a default. There's a procedure they should follow in notifying you, but many DCAs flout the law and consumer regulations.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was give this letter by Rory, who in turn had it from Powelll and I found it VERY useful with a similar matter....

 

Your home address)

_________________

_________________

Date: ____________

 

 

 

 

To: ______________

__________________

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your signature)

  • Haha 1

All my knowledge has been gained from personal experience and the sharing of advice from fellow members.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you find MHall or Black Horse (or both) have entered negative information about you on your credit files they are required to remove it or prove otherwise.

 

Write to Experian,Equifax etc and tell them the matter is in dispute. Write (RECORDED DELIVERY) to MHall and tell them to remove the entries forthwith. Give them a short time to comply - no longer than 14 days. You should also inform the Information Commissioner as this is a Data Protection Act matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses, they have been very helpful.

I am drafting the letter to Mackenzie Hall tonight, using the helpful template as posted here.

 

I have done a credit check and as of today all is clear and A1 as it should be. I am drafting the letter and addressing to the person outlined on the CSA website against Mackenzie Hall.

 

I will be sure to report back as to how Mackenzie Hall respond, or don't.

I will also follow the advise to perhaps make trading standards aware.

Thank you all very much in your guidance and watch this space!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

All letters have been sent.

No response so far.

New letter arrived today from Mackenzie Hall..... final notice demand!

These guys are funny are they not, I laughed so hard a little bit of wee came out.

I have all the relevant complaint forms from the CSA ready and waiting and they have been informed.

Just need to check my credit rating again at some point to make sure they're not black listing me.

Will keep everyone updated as to how this case goes.... be relevant for anyone who is being harassed by Mackenzie Hall who don't have any debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have read elsewhere on this forum MH are the lowest of the low and thats pretty bad when you consider how bad some of the DCAs are. It is a well know ploy oh MH to send out a mass mailshot of people with a simialr name in a particular town in the hope that some poor mug falls for their lies. Although East Ayrshire TS are up to their ears dealing with these numpties you should add your complaint to the list

Link to post
Share on other sites

You certainly should.

 

They were incredibly horrible with me and when I finally got the alleged dates of the debt from them, i knoew nothing about it. i told them this and they still pressed me for money I didn't owe. All they cae about is getting the commission in - get in touch with Alan Stewart at TS. He is probably busy because (as he told me previously) MH send out these letters in batches and so they they get calls in batches too.

 

I would also report the matter to your local TS and to the OFT. If enough people complain, they WILL lose their license.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending a complaint to the CSA (Credit Services Association) is an empty gesture. they exist only to support their members. The Financial Services Ombudsman would be a better bet - but only after you've jumped through all the hoops that is MHall's complaints procedure. If they don't send you details though you can go straight to the FOS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's if MH let you go through their complaints procedure - when I asked, the phone was hung up on me.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you write to them and they don't resolve the complaint within 8 weeks, the FOS will get involved.

 

My 8 week wait for Cabot to fob me off seemed to take an eternity...

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Mackenzie Hall refuse (or ignore) a request for details of their complaints procedure they are adding to their own difficulties.

 

As holders of a Consumer Credit Licence they are obliged to have a written complaints procedure. They are obliged to let their "clients" have details of it. Refusing to do this is a legitimate reason to go straight to the Financial Services Ombudsman and this fauilure to comply should be highlighted in the initial letter to the FOS. The reason for the complaint will follow the refusal to comply. The FOS may decide to investigate. If he does that's a bill of £450 for Mackenzie Hall. Sooner or later the penny is going to drop that refusing to comply hurts the bottom line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Mackenzie Hall refuse (or ignore) a request for details of their complaints procedure they are adding to their own difficulties.

 

As holders of a Consumer Credit Licence they are obliged to have a written complaints procedure. They are obliged to let their "clients" have details of it. Refusing to do this is a legitimate reason to go straight to the Financial Services Ombudsman and this fauilure to comply should be highlighted in the initial letter to the FOS. The reason for the complaint will follow the refusal to comply. The FOS may decide to investigate. If he does that's a bill of £450 for Mackenzie Hall. Sooner or later the penny is going to drop that refusing to comply hurts the bottom line.

You mean the 4000 pennies will eventually drop. Though judging by Muckhalls previous behaviour it will take a fair few lots of 4000 pennies to wise these cowboys up

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...