Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had to call an ambulance for my wife, but one of the paramedics was not happy, about the condition of our house, as it's cluttered. And he  would only see to my wife, on the ambulance itself. After diagnosis they took my wife to hospital. My wife was ill for a few months, and received help from the district nurses. We then got a call from a social worker, who wanted to visit us, and discuss ways to make my wife more comfortable. When I asked for more details, she became vague, but could give us a phone number, if she visited. I politely declined her offer, as I was coping, along with my daughter in caring for my wife. Then a letter arrived from another social worker, saying similar things, to the first. I didn't bother to reply. Another letter has just turned up, from the social services legal department, which doesn't say anything specific, but refers to the other social workers trying to visit us. Coming from a legal department, has badly upset my wife, who's recovery was on going, and she now fears that someone will be coming to the house, to do whatever. Do we have to respond, or take notice of these people. Also we recently had a fire prevention officer come and fit, smoke and heat detectors. He didn't voice any concerns with the conditions at the property. Worried, Paul.
    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

charges claim - just about to issue


Guest Alison82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Alison82

Update………..

 

I submitted my claim Halifax offered a refund a few day before they were due to file their defence; no mention of removal of the default! I wrote back to Helen Rawnsley and told her that I would not accept this unless they include removal of the default. No reply as it was 2 days a go so I rang them and was told that they will refund the charges but are defending the default!! How does this work out!! The default only happed because of their charges!! HELP

 

I know they are probably bluffing but can they do that (defend part of the claim and ignore the rest)? What if they put the money in my account it makes it look like if I have accepted it and how will I fill out the allocation questionnaire if they are just defending the default.

 

I wrote to Experian to get it removed that end (explained about the penalty charges) they wrote to Halifax, Halifax said it was correct and that was that!! So Exprian won’t remove it, it seems all they have to say is yes it is correct even if it is not!

 

HELP I AM REALLY STUCK AND ANNOYED!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

personally I'd of started proceedings long ago, I think almost 7 months is more than enough time to give them. I'm pretty sure that they've also acted against the banking code issuing a default against you on money that you clearly stated was in dispute so when you issue proceedings state this asking for compensation at the judges discrestion

Rbs £114 + contractual at 29.84% I won total=£125 no laughing it's a win

Don't moan about it DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

I did start it a while ago but they asked me to put it on hold for 28 days at one point which I did as it was quite a complex case (not just charges), I know what you mean though it has takedn FAR TOO LONG! (not shouting at you, shouting at them!!) Yean it's all very well quoting that but they just ignore it!! and so will the IC but enough is enough letter bing sent to th IC tommorrow!!

 

Any advice what to do with the claim though.

 

ps: Their defence dealine was up yesterday

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

I have submitted my claim against Halifax for £2,600 approx; they have now refunded me in full but are not willing to remove the default which was due to these charges. They have submitted the defence and stated that they have given me a refund and say the default was not because of he charges it was a true reflection of how my account was run, How can this be! If they had applied true pre estimated penalty charges (i.e. £2) then I could have paid them off and their would have been no need to issue me with a default notice and enter the default! Instead they charges me over £1,500 and removed my O/D! At the time I was working just one day a week (after finshjing uni and looking for a job) earning just £245 and they sould see this as I used that same account; this works out to be 9 times my salary that they were demanding!

 

I wrote to them the day after they wrote to me and said that I am not willing to accept the refund unless they remove the default but this must have crossed in the post as the deposited the money and submitted the defence.

 

I am going to submit my allocation questionnaire with the cheque as normal by the 13th August along with a statement from me (a copy of questionnaire to Halifax but not the statement).

 

Can they justify this, where do I stand? Are they just seeing how far they can push me or is this something else?

 

 

Thanks :)

 

This is my main thread, sorry for starting another one

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/134-1-600-default-halifax.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take this to the Finanancial Ombudsman service. They have a website that will give you all the details of how to make your complaint.

17/5/06 - Halifax -preliminary letter sent

31/5/06 - Halifax - LBA sent

15/6/06 - claim filed

6/7/06 - SETTLED IN FULL £3,306 + £859.95 interest

13/7/06 - Abbey Credit Card - Data Protection Act letter

10/8/06 - Abbey CC Rec £150 gwj £192 oust.

13/8/06 - Abbey CC - prelim letter sent

28/8/06 - Abbey CC - LBA

18/9/06 - Abbey CC - Settled in full - £200 paid

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

I orginally done a DPA request, but they did send me a default notice but regardless; the default was due to the charges! What would a s.10 request do? And is the Finanancial Ombudsman likely to do anything? Should I let it go all the way to court; this seems really 'unfair', why should I be stung for 6 years because of their dishonstey!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming your s.10 request was included in your prelim letter, although as this issue is already at court stage it is pointless doing another.

 

Was the payment made as an offer to settle dependant upon you not pursuing the default issue or was it a partial acceptance of the court claim?

 

Either way you are entitled to keep the money either as partial settlement of your claim or in satisfaction of part of the claim. If it was an offer of partial settlement, however, be prepared for them to take it back on receipt of your letter.

 

Have they actually submitted the defence with the court or was that just stated in the letter they sent you?

 

The Financial Ombudsman can investigate them and fine them - but they can not provide a remedy for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

Hi, they offered to settle for the full amount but did not mention anything about the default in their letter which is why I wrote back to them saying that I was not prepared to inform the courts of a settlement until they removed the default as well, I did not say that I wasn’t going to accept the money.

 

They made the settlement before they received my letter as it must have reached them the day or the day before their defence was due. They have submitted a defence to the courts to defend the removal of the default.

 

Ok, so I’ll inform the IC, and continue as normal with my claim, do you think they have grounds to leave it on my file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You did the right thing in your letter, but still be prepared that they might remove the money just in case. Although if they have only defended the removal of the default it seems they are accepting liability to repay charges.

 

I can't comment on your particular case- although it seems the crucial question in these cases is whether the charges were levied before or after the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

i am new to this but just read your thread and wondered what reply you got from the halifax after you sent prelim, i have just sent this and got a reply saying they will look into it and get back to me within the next 4 weeks, should i just send the LBA letter or wait the 4weeks and then send it?? what did you do?

 

thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

In their defence that stated that they have refunded me the full amount (interest plus costs) I don’t think they are likely to withdraw it but I shall take it out incase.

 

My account was fine in October until some cheques bounced then week after week that added more and more charges sometimes as much as £117 a day, finally in January the sent me a default notice for £1,700. One of the managers (Peter Lane) said I could pay £700 and then pay the rest of month by month I tried to raise this but couldn’t which is when I discovered that bank charges were unlawful. I sent my DPA request and told then the fact that these charges were unlawful and quoted section 13.6 of the B.C on February 2nd (I know), they then issued the default on the 6th February.

 

Now I have never had a default notice from them in the past and it was only because their charges were so high and frequent that I could not afford to pay.

 

I know 100% that if they did not add £1,700 worth of charges and remove my £500 overdraft over those 3 months (when they could see and I told them that I was only working one day a week) then my account would not have been defaulted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82
Hi there

i am new to this but just read your thread and wondered what reply you got from the halifax after you sent prelim, i have just sent this and got a reply saying they will look into it and get back to me within the next 4 weeks, should i just send the LBA letter or wait the 4weeks and then send it?? what did you do?

 

thanks for any advice

 

Hi they fobbed my off big time! asked me to wait 28 day whilst they thought about it and stupid me I did; that’s why this has dragged on so long plus then running over the DPA deadline. All I can say is, stick to YOUR time table, keep it short and sharp and don’t believe a word they say.

 

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me completely unfair the way they have treated you and that the default was caused by their charges (opinion only). Also (again only opinion) the chances of them actually defending this are slim. If they do not defend where the have to pay out thousands in money whats the chances of them actually turning up and paying to defend the removal of a default which has very little or no impact on their business?

 

Best of luck with this

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still feel it would worth a try at taking it to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you put your case to them and they agree that you have a just complaint they may advise Halifax to withdraw the default. What is their to lose?

17/5/06 - Halifax -preliminary letter sent

31/5/06 - Halifax - LBA sent

15/6/06 - claim filed

6/7/06 - SETTLED IN FULL £3,306 + £859.95 interest

13/7/06 - Abbey Credit Card - Data Protection Act letter

10/8/06 - Abbey CC Rec £150 gwj £192 oust.

13/8/06 - Abbey CC - prelim letter sent

28/8/06 - Abbey CC - LBA

18/9/06 - Abbey CC - Settled in full - £200 paid

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

Yes I will do this, I hope they get a fine!

Does anyone have a template that I can modify?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Alison82

Brief outline, charges loads by Halifax, they gave me a time limit of when to pay it otherwise they would default me, found out about ‘bank changes’ just before the deadline did not pay and started the process instead. Now a good few months on I filed my claim, Halifax have refunded over £2000 (£1500 hadn’t actually been paid by me so it was voided off my account). In my claim I included the full removal of this default as it was directly a result of the charges. Halifax refunded the money but refused to remove the default saying it was not due to the charges?!

 

I received a letter the other day from the courts to say

 

The District Judge said the following:

 

“Advise the claimant that her claim is for a monetary sum and if that sum has been paid there is now no claim to pursue”

 

 

What should I do now, I followed the rules, and I included it in my claim and gave a brief out line of how the situation began.

 

 

I can’t allow this default to stay on my file foe 6 years due to Halifax’s greediness, their reason of issuing the refund was that it would be too expensive foe them to defend; then surely this would be the same?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

Yes I will have to find it again as this was a few months ago, but I definetly included the default removal as part of my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alison I've merged your threads as it is difficult to see the full history otherwise. I don't know if I've done all the relevant bits though as you had 29 threads so it is almost impossible to see which thread relates to which.

 

I can't see a claim number through any of your posts, or a mention of which court. We really need to know what your Particulars of Claim said in full, and which court you sumbitted your claim through.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...