Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord Scamming Council


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I started renting this property in Feb 2003 for £950 an agreement was signed for the amount of £950. We handed this into the housing office of our local council (housing benifit).

The council paid most of the rent.

In 2006 the Landlord decided the original rental agreement was wrong and didn't include the conservatory as an extra room, the amount should have been £1150 she wanted backpay from the council.

 

The landlord approached me, and explained that should i aggree to the extra room and the mistake (she claims) to the original agreement, the council will pay her more money and this wouldn't affect my position.

I refused to go along with her scheme.

 

in october 2006 I recieved a letter from the council where they refused the increase in the rent as the original aggreement was signed by the landlord. apparantly the landlord applied for her increase and backpay on my behalfe without me knowing.

 

I approached the housing office and explained that i had nothing to do with any correspondence between the council and the landlord. All council checks were going staright to the landlord.

 

Throughout the entire tenency from 2003 I have recieved only one gas and electric certificate.

In 2005, I was on holiday when the house was burgled, the window where they broke in was twisted away from the fram and cannot be closed. the reception area (with the broken window) is pulling away from the main building leaving a large gaping hole. allowing slugs to slither in.

 

during winter the house is like a large cold room. I spend approx £20 per week on gas and £20 on electric just to keep the house at room temprature.

The heating system works only one way, on hot water all the radiators heat up. on central heating all the radiators heat up.

The landlord says i should turn off the water pump whenever i want to get hot water.

In the summer the house it then a sauna

she has been informed that the entire boiler system needs replacing.

 

I have now recieved a new tenancy aggreement on a 12 month fixed term at £1150 p/cm in the same letter there is a photcopy of a notice requiring possession. expiry date 1st nov 2007.

Im confused as to why the dodgy possession notice and the aggreement at the same time.

 

Council have informed me that the house has five rooms and not six and falls under the £950 rent control.

 

Where do i go from here

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is known as "sword of damocles" in the industry - landlords wrongly think that the notice will be valid - it is not due to the offering of a new tenancy. Before we say where to go, I guess the question is where do you want to go? Do you wish to stay in the property or leave?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if i leave then the next tenant will have the same problem, why should landlords get away with demmanding high rents and offering poor living conditions. she needs to be put in her place , as far as i can see she is trying to defraud the council, ("no if's or buts")

if it comes down lo me leaving, can i contact the necessary people ie gas/electric inspector as well as building inspector. who would foot the bill if this is chargable. I know if i do all this but want to remain she will o doubt issue me with notice.

she cannot keep any of my deposit as she didn't get any when i moved in. (her arrangement as she was desperate to get a tenant)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
It is known as "sword of damocles" in the industry - landlords wrongly think that the notice will be valid - it is not due to the offering of a new tenancy. Before we say where to go, I guess the question is where do you want to go? Do you wish to stay in the property or leave?

Update

the landlady has now put a claim in to the council and had it approved for £1150 with this she has given me two letters stating the amount we pay her will remain the same as befor totaling £950. as the council was paying £230 per month toward a £950 rent my part would be £720, her letter states I will continue to pay the £720 and the councill will pay the balance, the council now pay her £344 per month, at no point was a rental agreement signed.

I would also like to know if I can seek compensation for the living conditions. In 2003 the property was burgled and the thieves managed to pull the back porch/entrance section away from the rest of the building and twisted the window frame preventing the window from closing, so for the past 5 years I have had to put up with living in an ice house. numerouse requests have been made to her, to repair the building, with no success. I have recieved no gas or electric certificate for the past 5 years. I have now reached the end and plan to move but befor leaving, I need to know if I can initiate Fraud charges against her for the council claims (most of wich she did on our behalf without our knowledge).

 

She has now decided to get a possession order because with her continual messing around with the benifit claims the rent amount fluctuates, meaning for a few months the rent was £900 the jumped to £1150 resulting in the council paying different, she has also raised the amount for a while when she claimed my 18 year old daughter lived with us as a student when in fact she moved out at the age of 16 to live with her friend. (two years prior)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...