Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Duffers mum v Sainsburys Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dm

It used to get me stressed about all the charges and intrest they keep putting on. Now I know they cannot enforce the debt I dont care anymore. I aint offering them no F&F as If I worked the debt out most of it will be interest from when I used to balance transfer all the time.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 561
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I received another letter today from Sainsburys apologising for the fact they sent me a text message to my DH's mobile number but they wished to explain that their telephone service aims to provide a quick and mutually beneficial resolution to any situation blah blah blah. What a load of cobblers, their telephone service aims to try and intimate people into paying more than they can afford!

 

They have removed the number, just as well as its been changed now anyway :D and have set an arrangement for three months for the amount I'm currently paying per month. However nothing about stopping interest and charges, still I guess it gives me a little more time up till Feb next year. I think I'll write back and say thank you very much, now as you haven't complied fully with my CCA request when are you going to refund all the unauthorised interest and charges and refrain from adding them in the future. What do you think my chances are of getting them to agree..... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats the chances of me winning the lottery without buying a ticket?

 

lol

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a reply from Sainsburys yesterday regarding sending an application form. The have sent me the application form again!!!

 

What planet they on!!

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it sounds like plant Application form is a CCA.

 

Its half way across the galaxy turn right and the after about 1000 light years take a left.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent another letter off now recorded delivery, asking yet again why they are still charging interest etc and would it be please be possible to have the same person from the same company dealing with my complaint, rather than Mr Joe Bloggs who has so far written to me in the same name from Sainsbury's, Halifax and Bank of Scotland, I think they forget what paper they have in the printer! Absolutely useless. Next stop TS, but which TS should I approach, any idea? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really is a juggernaut of an organisation, DM. The front line soldiers have absolutely no idea of how it all works. Today I spoke to 6 different dept's there trying to speak to a person that apparently doesn't exist, but signed a letter posted two days ago.... sheesh

 

I believe it is this parkinsonianism, rather than any real malice that keeps getting them into trouble ... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi peeps, I'm going round the block or is that bend with them too!Umpteen letters arguing about it not being an agreement only an application then passed to Blair Oliver & Scott with threat of court action, so sent request under civil procedure rules, passed back to Sainsburys, demand for £10 as they said this comes under SAR request - thought about arguing but then thought knickers, paid it with postal order, umpteen telephone calls then daft letter saying they'd sent me the agreement and terms and conditions, never got either, also saying they can ring as many times as they like and visit me, spent this afternoon composing suitably uncomprising letter in reply so ding ding Round 54, round and round we go:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sainsburys are currently calling me, on average, 20 times a day from 08.30 to 21.00. They only have my mobile number so I've put them in my phone book and set them a silent ringtone.

 

Unfortunately I can't do that for private numbers when they call withheld but I don't take private calls anyway so I just ignore that ringtone.

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Auntie - Have you sent them a letter stating you only want communcation in writing and more importantly have you actually sent a letter headed "COMPLAINT"?

 

Doing that has worked for me far better with both Sainsburys and Barclaycard because they have to deal with it in accordance with their complaints procedure. I'm not happy about the charges and interest, but if they keep letting me pay them £10 per month for the next few months and keep it "in house" I'm happier than if it was passed to a DCA.

 

Is your mobile contract or pay and go? if contract contact the company and ask if they will change your number. O2 did this for me recently, with no fuss, and no charge, I just advised them I was getting strange calls. If its a pay and go mobile, go and buy a new sim card with a different number. Either way with a number new they won't be able to contact you.

 

Good luck - they are an absolute nightmare! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DM you report them to your local Trading Standards, here's the link:

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

Auntie send them this letter ammended as necessary recorded ASAP:

 

Your Street

Town

City

Postcode

 

DATE HERE

Company Name

Road

Town

City / County

Postcode

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sirs

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[NAME HERE]

 

Hope this all helps :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. To be honest now they're on silent I just ignore them. It's only 12 more days till I can tell them they owe me a CCA :)

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got another letter from Sainsbury's yesterday, enclosing..yes you've guessed it.....another copy of the application form and another set of current T&C's. The letter adds that they note there is an agreement in place for me to pay £X per month, but they state that I only said I would pay that until I got my "agreement" their collections dept will therefore be in touch to discuss repayment.

 

Hmmmm, now let me see what my reply might be..yep its another go forth and multiply sort of response!!

 

I will write next week thanking them for sending me yet another copy of the application form and T&C's but advising they are still in default, I think I'll also email their local TS now too. My problem Babybear is that I get letters from Leeds, Halifax and Scotland too, so still unsure which to go for. I'll have a think over the weekend! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DM

 

Why not go for them all. Your bound to get some with all of them. :)

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DM,

 

If you get a good response from one you may get a good response from them all.

My idea of a good response is:-

 

AHHHHHHHHHHH she has done as she treatened and now we are going to have to explain our selves. Maybe we should just leave her alone and call of the debts.

 

You can only hope :)

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I received a response from Sainsbury's today in relation to my F&F settlement offer, only it wasn't from Sainsbury's it was from Blair Oliver & Scott, saying after careful consideration they are unable to accept my offer. Well I am going to respond saying I didn't offer you anything and I don't owe you anything. Yet another CC company assigning the debt when its in dispute, I am going to sit down over the weekend and email TS about these companies. I suppose that if BOS are dealing with this now at least it means the charges and interest will cease, but thats the only good thing. I will now write to Sainsburys with yet another complaint.

 

In the meantime I suppose I should ask Sainsbury's and not BOS what figure they will accept in F&F so that I can then barter with them. Will it ever end! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep ask them.

 

I am in the middle of just looking over the letter again and will get back to u with it.

 

I have decided to make a nice addition to the letter that u will love.

 

Oh and remember to write to BOS and advise them to BSO ( basically sod off) :)

  • Haha 1

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well If they still have not produced an agreement with all the perscribed terms on it I would offer them nothing.

 

As the guy who wrote the Consumer Credit Act 1974 states below:

 

As the draftsman of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 I would like to thank Dr Richard Lawson for his interesting and well-argued article (30 August 2003) on Wilson v First County TrustLtd [2003] UKHL 40, [2003] 4 All ER 97.

Dr Lawson may be interested to know that I included the provision in question (section 127(3)) entirely on my own initiative. It seemed right to me that if the creditor company couldn’t be bothered to ensure that all the prescribed particulars were accurately included in the credit agreement it deserved to find it unenforceable, and that the court should not have power to relieve it from this penalty. Nobody queried this, and it went through Parliament without debate. I’m glad the House of Lords has now vindicated my reasoning and confirmed that nobody’s human rights were infringed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...