Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

pressure to quit work..??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6118 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My boyfriend has been working for a year and a half at a well known company. He has been trying for over 6 months to get on a permanent shift as he is my main carer. The company have been messing him around all this time and he recently had to take some time off while I was in hospital. Obviously, his employer didnt like this but they seemed to be 'fairly' understanding about it and were in the process (apparently) of sorting out the permanent shift he needed.

 

Now, he hasnt had a perfect work record but this particular company have been in the news quite recently about sacking employees......

 

Well, he went into work today....a meeting with a manager had been arranged. My boyfriend had no notice of this. He went to see his union rep who told him what it was about. The union rep then advised him that he was going to get the sack and his best option would be to quit before that happened. My b/f had an unofficial chat with the manager who basically told him the same thing so, he resigned.

 

I feel that he was under duress to resign and wasnt given enough notice about this meeting. I also feel that the union rep didn't represent my b/f fairly. I've been reading about constructive dismissal and resignation while under pressure from an employer. Do you think we could have a case for that?

 

I dont know about any warnings my b/f had previously (we'll be getting all the details of that tomorrow) but is there anything we can do in the mean time? Anyone got any advice? Thanks in advance.

Halifax

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 30/1/2007

Prelim letter sent asking for total of 1571.52 - 15/3/2007

LBA sent 30/3/2007

court papers filed

Offer letter received - £1495.13

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, tsk, that's disgusting.

 

He may have a claim for Constructive Dismissal. Have a look at this website: www.gmemploymentrights.org.uk

 

Check out their page 'Your Rights At Work' and you'll see a list of Advice Factsheets.

 

Greater Manchester Pay & Employment Rights Advice Service -> Advice Factsheets -> Your Rights at Work ->

 

Scroll down and look for the 'Unfair Dismissal' sheet.

 

If you live anywhere near the Manchester area, give them a ring, they're hot on employment law.

 

--

 

Another good site is Emplaw:

 

Disclaw Publishing - Employment Law, unfair dismissal, redundancy pay

 

--

 

Also, give ACAS a ring tomorrow.

 

Acas - Rights at work

 

Good luck with it. Hope he gets them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much for the links and advise...we'll see what we can do!

Halifax

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 30/1/2007

Prelim letter sent asking for total of 1571.52 - 15/3/2007

LBA sent 30/3/2007

court papers filed

Offer letter received - £1495.13

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sorry your Husband was given such bad advice from his Union Rep.

 

The law states that Employers must follow the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure (DDP) at the very minimum when dismissing an employee or taking relevant disciplinary action for the procedure to be fair. The DDP is a 3 step procedure which is as follows:-

 

1: Letter from the employer to the employee setting out the circumstances which have led them to consider dismissal or disciplinary action. The letter should also invite the employee to a disciplinary meeting and the employee should be provided with sufficient time to prepare for it.

 

2: Disciplinary meeting. Employee should be notified of decision post meeting and advised of their right to appeal( 5 working days from the date of letter dismissing him )

 

3:Appeal. Employer should appoint a more senior manager to represent them at the appeal.

Should the employer fail to follow the DDP and proceed to dismiss the employee, the dismissal would amount to automatic unfair dismissal and the employee would be entitled to claim up to 50% uplift in compensation on what they would otherwise expect to receive at tribunal. When gauging procedural fairness, the following applies:-

 

DDP not followed = automatic unfair dismissal

 

 

 

DDP followed but employer failed to follow own disciplinary procedure or other pertinent procedure = dismissal not unfair should the employee have ultimate been dismissed had the other procedure been followed.

 

 

Because of this and the fact you state your husband had no know age of the meeting, the rep should of had the meeting cancelled or go ahead with it and then place an appeal on the grounds that the DDP was not followed.

 

 

My advice is to now speak to his union’s main office, telling them he resigned on the advice of his rep and ask them to take this matter up.

 

 

The trouble is, by resigning he has lost his rights to take the matter before a tribunal as to bring a case of Constructive Dismissal, he must of followed the DDP and companies appeal process to the full and having no change he then feels compelled to resign.

 

This he has not done because he resigned before the first meeting.My advice to anyone is to always follow the DDP to the full, this way your rights are protected under law and gives you the option to being a case before a tribunal.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Did he have any written confirmation that he was advised to resign to avoid the sack? There is a case for constructive dismissal but I would imagine that both the manager and the union rep would deny having given this advice at a tribunal. Are there any witnesses? It might be hard to prove without evidence if your boyfriend's account is disputed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...