Jump to content


CCA 1st Credit / Connaught **SET ASIDE WITH COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just called the Courts today and the Judge has accepted the set aside hearing.

 

Will not post when it is just now but I cant wait.

 

Do you think Connaughts will turn up????

 

HAK

 

 

Still nothing back of the Magistrates Court yet!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just called the Courts today and the Judge has accepted the set aside hearing.

 

Will not post when it is just now but I cant wait.

 

Do you think Connaughts will turn up????

 

HAK

 

 

Still nothing back of the Magistrates Court yet!!

You will soon get a letter from the CON men advising you that they are withdrawing their SD. However unless you hear from the Courts that you are not required then you should go along on the date and ask for costs against the CON men

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for that ODC.

 

Thats what the woman form the Courts said turn up anyway if they back out.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been talking to a Solicitor.

Due to Con man issuing the SD without prior collection is not seen likley by the Courts and as we know abuse of the system.

She has said also to ask the Judge at the set aside hearing to guide you to take out a civil claim against them for harrasment etc...

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just a real shame that the onus for sorting out these disreputable DCA's is down to us...I do think the court itself should do something to stop the DCA's interpreting the rules and regulations in order to apply as much pressure as they want to debtors (or people they just assume are the debtors) without censure.

 

I think it is time that the Courts applied punative measures to DCA's that have been proven to harrass, intimidate and make life misery for ordinary people.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

just sent off a cca request to 1st direct myself today,this thread is very interesting reading!! Im a bit shocked that dca's read our posts!!!

I sent one last week to bryan carters too, I never thought I would be doing all this!!

I have been reading lots of posts for about a week and a half now, but im not quite sure what a set aside is, could someone point me in the right direction to read up about it.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

42 MAN

 

Firstly great to see you as a site helper :D.

 

i am just doing my defence for the Court claim and should be on to the SD shortly.

Are you around today?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42MAN/ MONX

 

I cant seem to get started on this. Totally lost:confused:

 

Any pointer in to what to take with me??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember HAK....you disputed the debt before the SD came through, they have not contacted you stating that it is their intention to drop the SD......i'd be pretty annoyed...!!! It is a serious abuse and a waste of the courts time to use the Insolvency service as a method of collecting disputed debts !!

 

You might find this interesting to HAK !!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/135078-me-1st-credit-stat.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it 42 Man!!

 

Cheers

 

Ive printed a load of legistlation of with rulings if needed.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just found this below

It again mentions signatures

 

 

Legal Loophole in a Statutory Demand

 

A statutory demand must show a named person or persons from the Creditor or their agent/solicitor whom you can contact directly. This is Rule 6.2 of The insolvency Rules 1986.

This means that if the statutory demand doesn't give the name of a person you can speak to then it is not valid. If you try to contact the named person and they won’t put you through then it is also invalid.

Be aware that named people on accompanying letters are not part of the Statutory Demand - only those on the Demand itself are valid.

Important - make notes of dates/times you try to call the named person on the statutory demand, together with the name of the person that you spoke to and a note of what was said. Write and confirm everything said by Special Delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Just got a letter from CON saying the SD was issued in error and they are writing to the Courts to say they will not be attending...

 

Should I still go?

Can I claim costs?

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...