Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dispute with removals firm


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6138 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Late Feb I enquired about storing furniture

with a local removals firm.

The storeman quoted a figure of £86.91.

This was for 2 containers per month,

1 month to be paid in advance, inclusive

of V.A.T.

However, the director required an immediate

payment of £60.00, which I paid and

obtained a receipt for.

At the same time,I was given a copy letter

confirming my bank details, which he had

requested,and the amount to be debited

each month.

As far as I was aware,the payments were

to be made via S/O, which was the agreement,

but this sounds more like a D/D

 

He is now refusing me access to my property on the

basis that there are arrears on the account.

He is now requesting 50% of the outstanding

balance, before he will allow access.

What are my rights on this ?

What if he has set up a DD instead of a S/O,

and arrears have accumulated as a result, does

this mean he has the right to deny me access ?

How best do I resolve this ?

The thing is, the letter confirming he has my bank

details, he is denying knowledge of, and the copy

I was provided with is in the container! HELP!

Also he is now requesting payment of £26.91,

outstanding from Feb ??

 

Any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you owe him the money, if so then sooner or later you will prob have to pay.

 

The DD or Standing order bit shouldn't make any difference.

I don't think that he can continue to deny access unless it was in the contract, and even then it's a bit iffy.

 

How can there be

£26.91, outstanding from Feb
if you only started in late feb and paid first month in advance?

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The DD or Standing order bit shouldn't make any difference.

I don't think that he can continue to deny access unless it was in the contract, and even then it's a bit iffy.

 

Ahhh, but it DOES make a difference, because he has set up

a D/D inadvertently, not collected the funds as he agreed to,

(£86.48 per month, first payment due 20th March, and every

month thereafter). It ALSO means there is an outstanding

balance on the account of £XXXXX, due to HIS error, for which

he is denying ME access.

That is the POINT I am making here.

 

Quote:

Do you owe him the money, if so then sooner or later you

will prob have to pay.

 

Whether the balance is outstanding is NOT the issue here.

 

How can there be

Quote:

£26.91, outstanding from Feb

if you only started in late feb and paid first month in advance?

 

 

My furniture was taken into storage on 22/02/07.

If you read my post correctly I was given two figures

of what the cost would be.

The first was the storeman, who quoted £86.91 to bring

the furniture into store (this was the month in advance)

The second figure was the director, who required a payment

of £60.00 to bring the furniture into store.

At no point in the conversation did he mention anything

about the other £26.91, and NOR has he ever contacted

me about the outstanding balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh, got you now.

 

Did you get a contract? That should set out the charges.

If your luck is like mine, the contract will be in the storage as well :)

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just wondering whether the

company has gone into liquidation

since the furniture side of the business

has shut down.

This is due to "increase in competition"

according to the director, though

they have been struggling for the

last 3 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Further to my original post, I have now

been to the C.A.B and they advised to

send a recorded delivery letter to the

director of the storage company, stating:

 

Dear Sir,

At the start of our contract you took

my bank details in order to set up a S/O

for my monthly payments.

You appear to have failed to do this as I

have had no deductions from my bank account.

Please rectify this situation as quickly as

possible.

My contract with you states that I am

allowed access to my belongings at anytime.

By denying this access you are breaking

our contract.

I have been to the Citizens Advice Bureau

about this and they will assist me to take

further action if you do not co-operate.

I have read in the paper that your company

is in financial difficulties, if this is true, are

my belongings safe with you

Yours faithfully

 

Any comments regarding the contents

of this letter, before I send it would be

appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my original post, I have now

been to the C.A.B and they advised to

send a recorded delivery letter to the

director of the storage company, stating:

 

Dear Sir,

At the start of our contract you took

my bank details in order to set up a S/O

for my monthly payments.

You appear to have failed to do this as I

have had no deductions from my bank account.

Please rectify this situation as quickly as

possible.

 

Did you not check your bank account? You have a duty as well to pay - you cannot blame the other side.

My contract with you states that I am

allowed access to my belongings at anytime.

By denying this access you are breaking

our contract.

 

Your contract probably says that you will pay the rental monthly in advance also - but you haven't - therefore you have also breached contract.

 

I have been to the Citizens Advice Bureau

about this and they will assist me to take

further action if you do not co-operate.

I have read in the paper that your company

is in financial difficulties, if this is true, are

my belongings safe with you

Yours faithfully

 

Any comments regarding the contents

of this letter, before I send it would be

appreciated

 

My calculations show that you should have paid £526.91 to date - including up to Aug 22 in advance and you have only apid £60 - I would get in touch with storage man and make arrangement to pay the arrears.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you not check your bank account? You have a duty as well to pay - you cannot blame the other side.

 

I have been informed that it was in fact

a D/D that he had set up NOT a S/O,

therefore he was responsible for collecting

the amount on the AGREED date, which

he never.

And yes I did check my bank account

And yes I did contact him regarding the MISSED

payments ALL to no avail

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...