Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi If you have went via a Mutual Exchange and this is to do with Social Housing/Housing Association then both parties need to firstly be approved by each parties Housing Association and accepted by them. Once this is done the relevant Housing Association for each will then get each party to sign a New Tenancy Agreement with the relevant Housing Association. So what we really need to know is: Does the other party to this Mutual Exchange know you have changed your mind on exchanging properties? Have they just signed an Agreement in principle to exchange properties? or Have they actually signed a New Tenancy Agreement for that Property? If they have signed a New Tenancy Agreement then this will make not now wanting to continue the mutual exchange difficult due to the New Tenancy Agreement being Signed. We really need to know what stage this is at to give correct advice
    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

me v virgin


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya all. Recieved my statements today which was the result of my sars. I do believe there should have been some more info than statements but will deal with this.

 

Have added up all the non ddr fees and the late payment charges and they total £215.00

 

Do i now just do standard 1st letter reclaiming money back and just adjust it?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

thanks

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Basically, yes - however you have to give them the opportunity to explain the charge is justified before you can move on to the reclamation phase. Point out the total costs you've incurred and ask them to confirm their costings for process your non-DD payments. When they don't, you then send them your LBA and start the ball rolling.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much buzby. I already have a letter stating there charges are in proportion to there costs but couldnt provide breakdown..

So will get on with prelim letter.

thanks once again

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

As I use the Scottish procedure, I can't help with Mcol as we don't use it. However, you just state the nature of your complaint, just the brief facts, what you are claiming for, and leave the rest to the court. VM will most likely settle on receipt of the court documentation.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Help please anyone!!!!!!!!

 

I have a managing director from telewest phoning me at 6.30pm tonight to discuss the late payment fees and non ddr fees. Have just spoken to a customer care bloke who is going to put a £9 credit on to my account each month to cover the late payment charge each month nearly.

They wont budge on the previous late payment charges. I asked for a breakdown of how they came to the £10 and they told me it is to cover the phone and letter fees and as an incentive to pay on time.

 

I asked where in the contract had i signed to say that i would be paying the late payment charges of £10.00 and they told me a letter would have been sent out when virgin took over and the late payment charge came into force.

 

The thing is i sent a sar to virgin and no where in what i recieved from them was a copy of a letter stating that they would be now charging a £10.00 late payment fee.

 

I need help with putting my argument across and im not very assertive and no good at arguments lol.

 

help please

 

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Karen - Don't Panic! The charge was well promoted, but that's not the point, it was applied to your account without your express agreement. You didn;t ask for it, it was imposed. Ireland has already prohibited firms from charging different amounts depending on payment method, if it's good enough for them - then clearly it is good enough for us.

 

You have the right to control who has access to your bank account, Virgin Media has no track record to speak of - say you'll reconsider in 12 months, but only if their billing system has not created incorrect bills during the period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i was on the phone to them earlier all the bloke kept saying was run your account in order and you wont get the charges. I dont know how to answer that really.

 

Hes made it quite clear that when this manager phones me back he will say exactly the same and will not refund these charges.

 

Am i agreeing that they should make charges just not this amount of what??

 

panicking now. half hour to go

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, Well call went bad. I ended up in tears through frustration at getting passed from pillar to post. I spoke to 8 different people on Friday regarding charges. I have got one late payment charge refunded but they will not refund any more

 

If i run my account in order i wouldnt get charged basically.

 

Apparantly they have no way of refunding charges. Regarding the non ddr fee they add i explained all the errors that had happened on my bill this year alone and said that if in six months there wasnt no further errors i would consider swapping to ddr but for now no way.. The man just told me tough basically.

 

I explained my situation financially and told them that the 10 per month late payment fee and the 5 per month non ddr fee is a lot of money to me.Its the equivalent of my sons dinner money for two weeks. No sympathy there.

 

I asked how much notice i have to give to cancel services with them and its 30 days. The man is going to ring me back wednesday to see what i want to do.

 

I cant find anyone that has actually started court proceedings against virgin media so dont really know what to do next.

 

Any help would be appreciated

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen,

 

First of all I would like to say that I sympathise with your plight since I am in the same situation and I thoroughly support your attempt to get these crooks to refund these charges.

 

However I think you should not panic and there is certainly no need to cry, on the contrary you should make them understand you have the upper hand.

 

I'm sending them a preliminary letter tomorrow and see how that goes. What I basically intend to do is send them a few letters (prelim asking them to explain their costs/request for refunds/LBA) stating clearly what the remedies are and then file a claim in court. I think this will cost me $60. If I lose then so be it!!

 

I know I am right (morally) so I have no fear of confronting these gangsters. Since the death of Brezhnev, there are two Mr Niets left in this world: Vladimir Putin and me!!! Nothing but a full refund will do. I'll just try to keep it simple: Refund or court. Full stop.

 

However I don't know if i'm right legally speaking... and this is why I will seek the opinion of a judge if they don't settle.

 

I'll keep you guys posted in my thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed/109948-reclaiming-charge-virgin-media.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well guess what? I didnt get the call back. I have just sent a lovely email to steve stewart who apparantly is high up in the customer concern team.

He probably wont even get to read the email but i think now i have exhausted all other option apart from court action.

 

I just dont feel confident though replying to them on the phone stating that if i pay on time i wont get these fees. Also one of the numerous people i spoke to friday said well we know you have a bank account because you pay on your bank card so why not set up a ddr.

 

I tried to explain all the errors that had happened this year alone and that was the reason i wouldnt set up a ddr. But they wasnt interested.

 

Will keep you posted if i get a response. Not really sure how long to give him to response but will see.

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do refund non DD fees.

 

I asked for a comparison of costs between DD & CC. When they said that DD was free to them, I told them that I didn't believe them, and that customer services were obviously involved in administering DDs, were they using non DD charges to subsidise DD paying customers. Eventually I got them refunded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is always a cost, their description of 'free' however needs to be qualified slightly - they receive the full value remitted by the customer (or in reality, taken by them). This also hold true for money paid over the counter (if they had one) or remitting by cheque. All other card payments are paid with a percentage taken off for processing by the finance house, so VM do not receive full value of the payment. HOWEVER there is a good argument that since these costs are those incurred by VM it is they who should pay the fees as a consequence of doing business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hiya just to update i never receieved any reply from steve steward. Last Wednesday i paid my bill of £180.00. I gave the money to my sister to pay in her bank account and then i phoned using her card on the automated line. I dont have a card. On friday my sister has checked her bank and they have taken the £180.00 out twice.

I couldnt beleive it. I phoned them straight away. The man that answereds response was on well it has put your account in credit now.

They are going to refund the money but it will take 3-7 days.

 

I told the bloke this is why i dont pay by ddr. And hes answer was well you get the money back.

 

Anyway ive had no more response regarding the late payment charges and the non ddr fees so i dont know wether to move on to mcol. I cant find anyone that has actually done this. I dont know what my chances are of getting any of this back.

 

Any help would be appreciated

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately paying by card is just as bad than providing a DD - with the latter you at least get a laughable 'guarantee' that can sometimes be used to enforce a repayment. With cards, they can pretty well manage to empty your account and you have to sort out the mess with them, not your bank! There is also the additional problem that they will have retained this card number, and if you are late or don't pay they'll debit the card again without giving notice.

 

You may have to go the MCOL route (as I did with SKY) but if your reason for NOT giving them DD access to your account is because of their inaccurate billing, it is very hard for them to justify their penalty charges for non DD!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya buzby, Im sorry i dont understand the last paragraph.

 

How did you get on with sky? What was you claiming back if you dont mind me asking was it late payment charges or non ddr fees.

 

Im still looking to see if anyone has had any luck with virgin media. I do believe its luck with them because whatever member of staff you speak to will tell you different and different reasons.

 

will keep you posted

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

The full story is here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/29691-sky-subscriber-services.html?highlight=sky+subscriber+services

 

There appears to be only one department capable of resolving these issues at VM, and they are not 'customer facing'. It is only when you get close to taking them to court, or have raised a formal action do you get on to these folk, who have the power to right all these wrongs fairly quickly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...