Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
    • CCA to debt purchaser pap reply to sols with copy of CCA letter included  all as per post 2 in letter of claim thread 
    • If I go to court to defend my claim and will will my licence be unrevoked automatically?
    • Does this mean my driving licence is void now? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can they force you to have prepayment meter?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter is moving into a property that already has prepayment meters. She currently pays by dd, it's the same supplier. She has been told they cannot change the prepayment meters cos they like to see how the customer gets on first? Is that right? How can they see how you get on when you have to pay before you get any supply anyway - it's not like your going to get into arrears.

 

Any advice kindly appreciated.

First letter to halifax sent rec del 26/4

Data Protection Act letter to capital one sent rec del 26/4

Halifax 1st offer dated 5/5

Capital One ack Data Protection Act request rec 6/5

Request for repayment to Capital One 2/8

LBA sent 22/8

Court proceedings issued 13/10

Settled in Full 9/11

Donation made 14/11

Link to post
Share on other sites

The person your daughter spoke to, clearly does not know what they are doing! you CAN request for a credit meter to be installed, however, this is subject to a credit check, and (depending on the supplier) there may be a fee for this. saying that they like to see how the customer gets on first is just a load of bull!

 

Hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the energy supplier saying this or the landlord?

 

I work for an energy supplier and sometimes you need have been with them for 28 days before they will do this but sometimes not. The 28 day rule normally only comes into effect if they've just taken over the supply at a property so...

 

Bit trickier if it's the landlord saying the meters cant be changed.

Abbey: 15/04/06 - Data Protection Act letter sent.

5th or 6th July - 2nd letter sent.

HSBC: 10/04/06 - Have to write DPA letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes perfect sense to me

 

Why not force your daughter to stay on the more expenive meter rather than changing it to an ordinary meter & get more money!. Has she asked for the DD discount etc even if she pays on the PP meter since its their arbitary choice and she has already proven she pays ok? After all, they get paid in advance!

 

Would a landlord be able to say "No" to a PP meter being fitted if a tenant wasn't paying? I doubt it, so can a landlord say no to an ordinary meter, other than charge for changing it backj at the end of the lease? (Just a thought)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of landlords prefer to have PP meters installed. There was a huge rise in unpaid bills at houses with private tenants in and then the tenants leaving with no forwarding address. The [problem] was to not pay the final quarter that they were in residency for. Most times the tenants were not getting deposits back as they had caused damage to the house and so they were not losing out.

Also Landlords were [causing problems] the tenants by with holding the deposits and saying that the bills were unpaid and that no deposit was due back. Thank heavens for new legislation where all deposits have to be held.

 

If it is the company saying no to DD then I would contact the meter company and ask them to refer back to her previous address and note there was no problems with the payment and remove the meter. If it is the Landlord then I dont think you have much of a case as he has the last say.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The landlord has no right to withold a deposit for unpaid bills if the bills are in the tenant's name. The deposit can only be witheld for (documented) damages, and all monies used for repairs have to be accounted for.

 

The new TDS should be able to resolve things like this with a lot less hassle to both parties concerned.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not obliged to give her a credit meter, it is down to the company. I suspect she has been given duff information, but if the comany continues to refuse to change the meter I can only suggest she finds a new provider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...