Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yee I mentioned after the new regulations. Depends if the amount off to date will take that threshold below £50k
    • In short you never communicate with a Debt Collector, they have no power here at all. The snotty letter is only used to respond to a properly worded Letter Before Claim. The only time you would be recommended to contact the PPC is to send the snotty letter. You do nothing but keep the tripe they send you unless you receive a letter before claim.
    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice needed concerning Go debt/YCC/DAF


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well after the last two letters they clearly wont be going to court, despite the fact that BOTH letters have said so. I will send that letter next week and ignore them as I have other issues now that need to be sorted. Thanks for that letter Post, should I emphasize the last sentence of that letter - I expect no more issuing threats ......................

 

I also want to put in the letter - This complaint might have been closed by yourselves but I as said on the phone it was not closed as the agreement is unenforceable as previously explained - what do you think?

 

I was going to offer them nothing Debt mate. They are fooling themselves if they think they can get anything out of me now.

Edited by pete_2000_2002
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i totally agree, it is either going to be the case of ignore em..less stress..etc or get involved with sending letters back and forth...you have made your position as clear as so a 3 year old could understand....threats..harrassment is all they are left with now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just going to send that last letter Debt and leave it at that. Regardless of how many future "our terms and conditions say this and you signed that and blah blah letters go and hollis send. They should know by now I wont be bullied into handing over 50p, £10 or even £1000. Why they think I will is beyond me the last letter was as clear as water which they have obviously ignored most of the important points. These muppets threaten court action even when you are paying them regularly - now I am not paying and dont intend to I havent seen any of these letters from go only hollis. One last letter to them then I await the blue from Northampton county court otherwise they can bog off.

Edited by pete_2000_2002
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi pete

 

so godebt still dont want to play do they

 

AS YOU SEE THEY WOULD NOT DARE ISSUR A CLAIM

SEND RECORDED

 

 

 

Your address

Date

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUT)

 

Formal complaint against GODEBT COLLECTION AGENCY for harassment

 

I am writing to complain under the above CPUT regulations. I am receiving persistent communications from GODEBT in respect of a purported debt in relation to yes car credit.

I have written to GODEBT and requested all communication cease and desist

 

Although I agree that GODBT are entitled to take reasonable action to pursue a debt if they feel that there is an outstanding issue, I consider that the treatment to which I am currently being subjected is beyond what might be considered to be reasonable in the pursuit of a contractual obligation.

 

I notice that GODEBT seem more prepared to carry out a campaign of harassment rather than to bring a legal action against me - which in my view would be the proper and reasonable course of conduct.

 

Clearly they are entitled to bring a legal action if they so wish.

 

I consider that GODEBT are operating an unfair commercial practice and it is for this reason that I am sending you this complaint.

As stated in my previous letter (COPY ENCLOSED)

ISSUE A COUNTY COURT CLAIM OR CLOSE DOWN THIS ACCOUNT.

 

I would be grateful if you would acknowledge this letter and let me know what procedures you now intend to follow and what your targets for action are.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Post, no they still dont want to play and are playing letter ping pong. Should I send this to Trading standards or OFT or perhaps both?

 

We told them in November to issue a claim but they just handed it to hollis ******. They are behaving like fleas at the moment, very irritable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

Hello all - hope everyone is safe and well.

 

I had help from you guys years ago with yes car credit who, long story short, sold me an invalid policy.

 

I received the attached letter this morning concerning PPI - I think I mentioned this to them years ago but didnt persue it.

 

There was a form enclosed for me to fill in and send back by 23rd November and my question is do I just fill out the form or do I need to tell them anything else?

 

Many thanks 

 

 

 

Plevin.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may as well complete it and send it back – but you have missed the deadline and so you probably won't get anything. It's a shame – you say that you knew about it years ago and you referred to them but you didn't follow it up.

If you have any evidence of the fact that you referred it to them, then you might well want to enclose that and say that you have already made a claim before the deadline and they haven't followed up. This would give you a chance.
Maybe you should think about sending them an SAR. Do it now

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Advice needed concerning Go debt/YCC/DAF

threads merged

letters now PDF.

 

hi pete...you know who..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you haven't there is an outside chance i have cause i think you gave/emailed me lots to redcat long ago.

 

you still working at (shh)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep still there mate and have been seriously job hunting for ages - need to smash the interviews though as thats where I fall down.

 

I've found a letter that says they cant enforce the debt and says "Any deposit or trade in has been used for the PPI insurance, not for the purpose intended.
As a result the agreement is unenforceable."

 

And a further letter was sent saying this "Could you also tell me why, where it is unlawful to use a deposit against any insurance (PPI, GAP) of any kind instead of the car, you still feel the agreement is enforceable.  It was not down to me to know what the deposits were going to be used for, that fact remains – the deposit should not have been used against the insurance(s)."

 

Should I enclose these letters with the form I need to send off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i can't see here that there ever was a PPI reclaim launched>

and it looks like go debt were bluffing all the way .

as if DAF had sold the debt, they wouldn't  now being writing to you

.

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...