Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student Loan Deferment Conspiracy ? (long)


daveydavey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just a quick addendum to my reply,these search agents,i asked student loans

to send me coppies of these reports,guess what they said? at the time they

were transferring all their paper documents to disc so couldnt supply me with

my request,now i dont know about you,but i find that statement laughable

birfkeith

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I find most of their statements laughable!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well have sent this year's deferment form & DLA letter 2 weeks ago, took copies of everything & sent by recorded delivery - the only way to send things to these charlatans - applying for a 3 year deferment based on my disablity as I qualify as a disabled borrower, still no reply yet or confirmation of my deferment ! Will see if they claim not to have received the deferment form & then check with the Royal Mail to see whether they indeed have ... which won't look good for them if they take me to Court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

SLC now ringing me every 2 days, on my landline & mobile - I keep asking them to take me to Court where i will vigorously defend their false claim & counterclaim for my expenses, the stress caused by their unwarranted harassment & defamation if they've issued a default notice on my credit file ... seems like they are full of empty threats as despite my urging they won't take me to Court, probably because they know their claim is false arising from their own maladminstration of my loan. So why harass me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh the joys of student loans....

 

I too am having mass problems with HSL who seem to have all my accounts now, but am posting a letter to them today about statute barred debt and also a seperate one asking them not to call or visit my house (though I have recently changed tel. number, and have no intention of giving them new one)

 

No doubt they "won't get " these letters but they will be posted recorded delivery.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

SLC now ringing me every 2 days, on my landline & mobile - I keep asking them to take me to Court where i will vigorously defend their false claim & counterclaim for my expenses, the stress caused by their unwarranted harassment & defamation if they've issued a default notice on my credit file ... seems like they are full of empty threats as despite my urging they won't take me to Court, probably because they know their claim is false arising from their own maladminstration of my loan. So why harass me ?

You're right. The Student Loans Company are a bunch of bullies, full of empty threats. As I've laid out in full in another thread, they've been threatening me for several years all over a form that failed to arrive, accompanied by their frequent lies and misinformation. I've been begging them to take me to court, but to no avail. My "case" was sent to their own internal Smith Lawson department, to NCO debt collectors - who decided there was no case to answer,then back to the Studen Loan Company proper, on to Smith Lawson again and then to NCO, who again decided there was nothing the courts could do, so passed the case back to the Student Loans Company ... who are now in the process of starting the whole circus all over again for a third time, issuing demands that I pay them in full, including their non-enforcible legal charges.

 

When it comes to that lot, "pathetic" is the word that springs to mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, I have posted elsewhere on Student Loans but this thread seems appropriate. Cash Collection Agency (?) are pursuing me, phonecalls, letters, threats for a student loan I have always deferred. I have been on disability benefits of one kind or another the whole time and eligible to defer, however, they say I owe, nearly 4 thousand, in failed deferrments as of 2003, and charges on top!

 

I have pointed out that I can prove my benefits for the period but they say 'its too late, you have to pay' ???? how crazy is that, what other system can do this, pretend you do not really have the criteria to defer just because they lost or did not receive the form or have messed up the record or whatever happens? it does not alter the facts. I cannot understand why they can suddenly appear out of the woodwork after years of me thinking it was a closed account, and no longer pursuable under the scheme and they turn up now, all rather strange.

I just dont get, either the deferment is designed for those on low incomes or benefits or it is not, to say because of some extra 'hidden' criteria (as in they do not contact you for ages as the above posts say) thus not alerting you to the problem so as to make matters worse, just smacks of dishonesty and some kind of deliberate duping of the most vulnerable, how can this be right!??

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Close Credit Management Limited is a member of the Close Brothers Group Plc, an independent merchant banking group founded in the City of London over 125 years ago.

Close Credit Management Limited specialises in the fields of commercial and industrial credit management and also operates in a number of specialist consumer debt sectors including motor finance and insurance.

The names "Cash Collection Agency", "Close Assistance" and "Debt Recovery Online" are trading names of Close Credit Management Ltd.

 

 

Pay Close : Homepage

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you are right, reading small print they are Close Credit Management Limited. I have done a Data Protection Act request and have all my copy agreements, they are pre 98 so regulated by CCA I believe. Yes I have always deferred, every year but they say they have none from 2003, which is why I am fighting them, they threatened to take me to court on the phone the other day unless I pay up.

their letter includes an option to defer???? which they state they will withdraw if and when they want to.

another thing, their letter states they will register the debt against my home????!!!

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi well i did defer, i sent them the deferment form, familiar story, they say they didn't receive it, leading to the creation of the false arrears figure. However, they backdated the following year's deferment form by three months - why would they do this if they had no proof of income / benefits (in the shape of the previous year's deferment form) to go on ? The SLC doesn't backdate without any proof of income / benefits, so this points to the existence of the 2003 deferment form, i.e. the only way they would have known my income / benefit entitlement in order to be able to backdate !

 

I am prepared to defend their false claim in Court, as it isn't my fault they took 12 months to process the 2003 deferment form & then only 'backdated' it by the 'maximum' 3 months, yet despite all their harassment & my requests they won't take me to Court, they just continue to harass me with near-daily calls to my mobile.

 

How can i stop them from harassing me ? Any ideas who i can make a complaint to (which organisation / body) to stop telephone harassment ? The only way i see a resolution is for them to take me to Court , which they won't do as their claim is false. I tried the complaints procedure, gave up as their replies were full of falsehoods (e.g. 'your case is no longer dealt with by the SLC, it is now being dealt with by Smith Lawson & Company, & they ignored the above point re 2003 form in their reply which was the salient point of my complaint!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi daveydavey, I am in a very similar position and received a call only yesterday from a very impolite man saying they would be taking legal action, no matter how much I explained (politely) that I had indeed deferred and was on disability bens he just kept asking about my income, and what and when would I pay. I have provided the relevant info but I do not have copies of the deferment forms, (stupidly it seems to me now but I did not think to copy them and did not have a computer or copier at that time), It seems to me that my income at the time must surely BE RELEVANT and not this 'rule' of no deferment form copy, then no deferment?? what business could hope to run in this way,

 

best of luck, all I seem to have at the moment is opinion and am busy with another case, but I dare say I will have to deal with it soon.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi maybelline I could send you a signed written witness statement if they do take you to Court (my feeling is they won't), stating that i have had similar experiences with the SLC over the non-deferment of my Loan. In fact you could probably get quite a few witness statements from people who've had arrears 'created' out of the SLC's maladministration & failure to process deferment applications - its a very common problem !

 

So if you do get taken to Court (which I doubt) reply here & we can sort something - they've been harassing me for years but haven't taken me to Court, so i doubt that they will as they have no real legal basis for claiming, but if they do make sure to counterclaim for your costs of defence & the distress caused by their unwarranted harassment, & unlawful £20 charges for letters etc etc. They just try to bully you into paying when you're clearly entitled under the Student Loans Act to deferment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the student loans co have now responded to say yet again that as far as they are concerned they did not receive a deferment form and therefore they are entitled to all the arrears (from 2003) they absolutely do not accept any other evidence of being on benefits even though their website clearly states that those on long term disability can apply for cancellation, (which I have done a long time ago ) yet again no reply to that either,

 

so where in the consumer credit act does it state that you can add a term to your agreement such as if the form goes missing reality becomes unreality????? I believe this surely MUST BE an unfair term as it seeks to take away our rights expressly given by Parliament in the act,

 

does anyone concur?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

thaks for that, I had another call last week from the same obnoxious person and I said 'didnt you get my letter and evidence' and they said no, long pause, 'oh but according to royal mail track and trace it has been delivered' well were not student loans, yes 'but i sent a copy by recorded to you and student loans and both recorded on track and trace as delivered??' not heard back yet but I do expect they will come back with some more nonsense, thanks, if they take me court I will certainly take your offer of help:):)

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...