novice computer user v barclays.*WON DEFENCE THOWN OUT*

[moggieb]

No such thing-have an old dog and have taught him loads!!!!! only as old as u feel and computers can be very confusing. You are not as novice as far as this forum is concerned!

[tezl]

No such thing-have an old dog and have taught him loads!!!!! only as old as u feel and computers can be very confusing. You are not as novice as far as this forum is concerned!

hope the saint dose not read this, she would spill her bacardi laughing.nice talking to you ,have to take my little one for a short walk now ,chill time.

[tezl]

hi, whats this sending in full p o c s about,after transfer to local court.thanks.

[saintly_1]

poc's = particulars of claim unless specifically asked for i wouldnt ... i would just send the soc's

[tezl]

poc's = particulars of claim unless specifically asked for i wouldnt ... i would just send the soc's

hi saint ,just remarking after reading jens thread darren advised full pocs,got me thinking ive missed something.ta.

[welshcakes]

i tezl

 

With jen's thread, Barclay's Defence specifically stated that she had failed to give sufficient details of account as well as the charges. I suspect that's why darren advised her to send in a fuller POC [along with her SOC which she had yet to send to either Bs or the court].

[tezl]

ive got the same as jenns .quote.the defendent puts the claiment to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof. i thought just updated socs.theres been loads of these defences ,first time ive seen darrens advice given.thanks.

[saintly_1]

Yours just mentions the proof of the charges Jens says ..The particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in question

[tezl]

Yours just mentions the proof of the charges Jens says ..The particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in question

mines same,the particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in questionand,orthe precise charges alledged to have been unlawful or dates thereof.to the exstent...,

[tezl]

mines same,the particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in questionand,orthe precise charges alledged to have been unlawful or dates thereof.to the exstent...,

it is alledged that the claimant incurred bank charges on the claimants account for unorthorised borrowings for returned cheques paid referral fees or any other such fees the defendent puts the claimant to strick proof of each charge and date thereof.

[dar£n]

You need to send in your POC's and updated SOC's, your strict proof of charges will be in your bundle [statements].

[tezl]

You need to send in your POC's and updated SOC's, your strict proof of charges will be in your bundle [statements].

hi darren, they had socs last week, is there template for pocs,thought i had done all this in original claim. cheers.

[dar£n]

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

Yes I realise you have sent in these things over and over, but just humour them, they cant argue not receiving if you have several recorded delivery receipts saying posted. etc.

[tezl]

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

Yes I realise you have sent in these things over and over, but just humour them, they cant argue not receiving if you have several recorded delivery receipts saying posted. etc.

soz darren, have read loads of threads and first time ive picked this up maybe others think they have normal defence and havent realised ,do you send to lit team and court. thanks

[tezl]

hi, do you put ammended pocs or similar.thanks.

[tezl]

hi, do you put ammended pocs or similar.thanks.

hi, is there a covering letter to accompany pocs?thanks.

[pjdavies2000]

Hi Tezl,

 

send a PM to this guy, and you'll get the court bundle sent through as a whole PDF!!!!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/97447-court-bundles-dummies-2.html#post905779

Remember to add your own SOCs and Barcaly completed claims as well!

 

Peter

[tezl]

on the pocs hard copy is it the whole thing or just pocs bit?thanks.

[tezl]

sorry about last night saint gave you bum info.

[tezl]

it is alledged that the claimant incurred bank charges on the claimants account for unorthorised borrowings for returned cheques paid referral fees or any other such fees the defendent puts the claimant to strick proof of each charge and date thereof.

what shall i do?thanks.

[saintly_1]

thats your soc's ...... what amazes me is that all the info for the soc's have come from bank statements that were issued by barclays so they actually have the information .......... I can hear rain forests crying over tha amount of papr that the banks make us use

[tezl]

mines same,the particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in questionand,or the precise charges alledged to have been unlawful or dates thereof.to the exstent...,

sorry again ,this is what i want to know about,getting conflicting info on what to do. ammend pocs? leave till judge oders?thanks

[saintly_1]

What is the exact wording of your point 1 ?

[tezl]

the particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in question and or the precise charges alledged to be unlawful, or the dates thereof .to the exstentit is alledged the claimant incurred bank charges on the claimants account for unauthorised borrowings ..whether unpaid fees for returned cheques, paid referrals fees or any other such fees..,the defendent puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof. got one finger cramp now.

[saintly_1]

My personal opinion of this is ... its just your soc's .. unless you didnt include the details of tha account on your initial poc's ....... If the judge deems the poc's inadequet then he will let you know