Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre   Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 22 May 2024   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300  and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984.   What is the total value of the claim? £385   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No   Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier   What was the date of your last payment? Never    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No  
    • Their FAQs state - Cancellations and modifications If your booking has been cancelled, Booking.com refunds you immediately. The processing time may take 7 to 10 days and depends on your bank. If you have questions, contact your bank directly. I'm a regular Booking.com and AirBnB user.  The former have never cancelled.  The latter have and my money was refunded immediately (not that that helps you as we're not talking about AirBnB!) Best to check with your bank and see (a) if you did pay in advance and (b) if it has been refunded. Also, have you received a message from Booking.com officially stating the cancellation?
    • I'm not up to date with the Legal Aid rules but I'm not sure that many people qualify. HB
    • You question timescales a bit in thread - From my experience, defaulting everything and ignoring all non PAP letters, while making no payments: - 18 months to LOC - further 18 months to be at court Most are still silent 3 years in though!. If making token payments, court, if ever would be 4-5-6 years from now - Hope that helps. My debt is similar, I started it 2021 and wouldn't believe I'm already over half way through default period. You need to make the decisions but follow advice already given in this thread, and you will be fine. Best time to plant a tree was yesterday, second best time is today. Good luck BT  
    • ah ok honeybee, no harm intended - I'll do that, I wonder whether there's any benefit to be had by applying for legal Aid as opposed to NWNF, it's about 6 months since this incident took place, so time to get the ball rolling
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brighthouse problems, advice please.


angel49
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if they are a DCA then if u offer to make a payment they have to accept, if they have refuse, which u say they have done, they are going against what the OFT guidelines on debt collecting, keep all letters and copy them, file a report on to OFT and TS, and tell them you've done so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to a conversation with my friend this morning, could someone check the following letter please? This is going to Cavesham Finance T/A Brighthouse in Reading

 

 

With reference to the above account numbers,please find enclosed copies of two letters that I tried to deliver by hand to the branch indicated. The letters were opened and read then given back to me as I asked for a receipt and was told by the salesperson to post them and get my own receipt.

I would appreciate this letter being regarded as an official complaint about the attitude shown by the staff at Brighthouse.

I have a 2 yr old child with heart problems who is just recovering from major surgery and find it distressing and intrusive when staff come to my premises uninvited and banging my windows. I have received numerous phone calls throughout the week.

I also understand your staff made reference to my non-payment this week to a neighbour. Under the Data Protection Act, this is an offence.

Though I have always endeavoured to maintain my agreed payments, now and again as I’m sure you will appreciate, other problems occur. I have attempted to make reduced payment on occasion and cannot believe they are actually refused. Should it become necessary for you to consider court action against me I would welcome this as I am sure a judge would be more than interested in the tactics used/shown by Brighthouse.

It is not my intention to avoid payment on this account (currently 2 weeks in arrears) I merely needed to make a reduced payment which has been refused,whilst I make inquiries into the “optional insurance”. Again, I questioned the neccessity of this and have been repeatedly told I had to have it if I wanted the goods.

Please give this letter your immediate attention if you wish to avoid any action I am considering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah... BRIGHTHOUSE!!! My favourite subject!

 

The "interesting thread" regarding Brighthouse referred to earlier can be read here...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53098-anyone-taken-brighthouse.html

 

So far, you have done all the right things.

 

Be aware...

 

Brighthouse CAN reposses their goods without a court order if less than one third of the agreement total has been paid. However, they CANNOT forcibly enter your home - they can ONLY reposses in a "public" place - (this is a throwback to hire purchase law which is favoured by vehicle finace companies.)

 

However, if MORE than one third of the agreement has been paid they can ONLY reposses with a court order - and, furthermore - if they DO reposses their goods (against your wishes, and after one third has been paid, and WITHOUT a court order) you can claim back ALL money you have paid on the agreement to date.

 

Be careful when cancelling OPTIONAL SERVICE COVER. They will get you to sign a new agreement - and this agreement will SUPERCEDE your previous agreement and you will no longer be deemed to have paid more than one third of the agreement. Make sure you provide a letter (head office and branch) to this effect, and to be INTEGERAL to any new agreement...

 

IMPORTANT Payments made previously on this agreement (XX payments to date representing more than one third of the total amount payable) should be reflected in any revised agreement. I do not waive any of my rights under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 regarding, in particular, “early settlement” and “repossession” as set out in section J of the original agreement.

 

Hope this helps.

 

I shall keep my eye on this thread with interest!

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lefty

Thank you for your comments, have taken note of your advice re any new agreement. From what I can see on the agreements and statements, she has paid well over 50% on each agreement.

I'm just shocked with how they treat their customers. All the letters have been mailed with copies to Caversham Finance.

Will post with any developments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brighthouse use every crafty trick in the book - but always just about manage to stay within the Law...

 

Another one of their favourite tricks is this one...

 

Say a customer is well past one third into their agreement and gets into difficulty. Brighthouse will apply the usual pressure and threaten repossesion etc. Brighthouse KNOW that to get around the Law they MUST apply for a court order...

 

So, after a few faceless threats the customer will get a call (usually from the manager or "defaults" manager) who will "very kindly" offer a practical alternative... He will offer to take your "outstanding" amounts and consolidate them all into one BRAND NEW agreement. A fresh start - and, most likely, lower payments. Brilliant!

 

However, your agreement has now become a BRAND NEW account, and you have lost all your rights regarding repossession - thus making it EASIER for Brighthouse to re-posses their goods if you get into difficulty again!!!

 

And... while we're at it...

 

OPTIONAL SERVICE COVER and DAMAGE LIABILTY INSURANCE.

 

Take note... that's TWO separate policies. Two!!! We've already discussed (at length) the con that is OPTIONAL SERVICE COVER - but what about their DAMAGE LIABILITY INSURANCE?

 

This insurance (around £250 on a £800 cash price product) is loaded AUTOMATICALLY and will only be removed if you can supply proof of "suitable" home contents insurance. (Brighthouse reserve the right to determine what is and what is not "suitable").

 

Please appreciate that this cover applies solely to the one product subject to your agreement (a TV for instance) and will be applied separately for each agreement you have.

 

You are told this insurance covers your product for damage, theft, fire, flood etc. However, unlike "real" home contents insurance it WILL NOT provide you with a replacement product should it become necessary (not even like-for-like) and will only release you from your agreement with Brighthouse - who, ultimately, benefit from the policy. You end up with NOTHING!!!

 

I live in a "high risk" insurance area, and yet I can insure the ENTIRE contents of my home (plus three high risk items) for less than £120 per year! However, as I am the policy holder (and would benefit from any payouts) my policy is deemed "unsuitable" by Brighthouse.

 

So, essentially, OPTIONAL SERVICE COVER and DAMAGE LIABILITY INSURANCE are, for all intents and purposes, one single policy split into two - and, when added to their very high APR on your hire purchase agreement - literally DOUBLE the original cash price.

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that lefty, at least forewarned is forearmed in every sense. I'm getting so involved with this Brighthouse thing my own problems seem quite straightforward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi adarling

Quite agree, they really do sound unpleasant. Having seen how they treated my pal for being 2 weeks behind is enough to keep me from stepping inside their shop................

We'll see what happens by way of response from these people.

thanks for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found a useful web reference site you may find interesting...

 

Community Legal Service Direct

 

OK, none of this is exactly rocket science - and should be all well known by now - but it can be reassuring to find actual LEGAL rulings on specific items of consumer Law...

 

In particular...

 

Hire Purchase (HP) problems

 

If you buy goods such as a car or furniture under hire purchase (HP) or a similar scheme, known as a 'conditional sale agreement', you don't own it until you have made the final payment. Until then, it belongs to the creditor (the finance company).

 

If you miss payments before you've paid a third of the total amount you owe, the creditor can repossess (take back) the item. This amount will be on the front of your agreement. However, the creditor can repossess the item only if it is in a public place, so they may be able to repossess a car, but they cannot come into your home and take furniture.

 

If you have paid a third or more of the total amount you owe, the creditor must start court action to get the goods back, or to get you to pay.

In this case, the court will send you a hearing date, when it will decide whether you must return the item or whether it can accept an offer by you to make payment.

 

 

You can ask the court for a 'time order', under which it can reduce the payments to a level you can afford (see 'Time Order' for more about how this works). The court can also make a 'suspended order', which means that the finance company can get the goods back only if you miss payments in the future.

 

If you want to avoid court action, you can write to the creditor to end your contract and return the goods.

You will then be liable for:

  • not more than half of the total amount you originally owed (this figure will be on the front of your HP agreement); plus
  • any arrears and the cost of repairing any damage to the goods; minus the payments you have already made.

This snippet may be of use, too...

 

My creditors keep calling me. What can I do?

 

People you owe money to are called creditors. Both creditors and collection agents use letters and telephone calls to recover debts as an alternative to court action. Most creditors have limited powers to recover a debt unless court action has been taken against you and you have not paid as ordered by the court. Some creditors may mention that they can make you bankrupt for debts of £750 or over. It is very rare for a creditor to take this action.

 

If you receive telephone calls from your creditors, it is important to explain that you are having financial difficulties and how you hope to resolve the situation. If you have done this and you are still receiving persistent calls from your creditors or their collectors, this may count as harassment.

 

Creditors should not put undue pressure on you to pay more than you can afford. Office of Fair Trading guidelines state that, for example, creditors should not:

  • contact you by telephone too frequently;
  • pressure you into selling any of your property or assets; or
  • pressure you into taking on further debt to repay existing debts.

If your creditor isn’t following these guidelines then you should keep a note of calls from your creditor including the date and time as well as the name of the person you are speaking to. You should also keep a copy of all letters. This information can then be used to complain to the Office of Fair Trading or your local Trading Standards Office.

 

 

 

All good stuff!

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

  • Haha 1

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lefty,

As you say....all good stuff.

The latest in this little saga is that Notice of Default Action has now been received. Have yet to see the letter which I hope will be tomorrow. Meantime, this letter will be heading in their direction.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am in receipt of your correspondence regarding notice of default action.

Please be aware that it is an offence to continue to pursue payment on a disputed account. Non-compliance of a CCA request is a complete defence in any court action taken that you may take and as such, any action that you do take will be vigorously defended.

On the 1st may 2007, I made a legal request for the Consumer Credit Agreement in relation to the above account (Consumer Credit Act, 1974)

To date, you have failed to fully comply with this request insofar as you have not supplied me with a complete list of all monies paid to you by way of statements as per my request under the said act. I enclose a copy of that letter for your convenience.

I must make you aware that I believe you are already in breach of The Office of Fair Trading Code of Guidance in which it states:

PUTTING PRESSURE ON DEBTORS OR THIRD PARTIES IS CONSIDERED TO BE OPPRESSIVE

This includes:

Ignoring disputes about whether you owe the money,

Refusing to freeze action if you dispute the debt.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi adarling

Same here,trying to catch up on my own little battles.

It seems pretty much quietened down, the last I heard was that Head Office had sent her a letter asking her to call the manager of the branch as he is not "allowed" to call her. To my knowledge she has not done so as yet. I may get time to catch up with her tomorrow for an update.

Will post with any development.

Thanks for your interest.

Hope your war is going better than mine,I'm battling with HFC part of HBOS

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Bump Bumpity Bump!

 

Greetings folks!

 

Hopefully, we will have successfully lured you back to this thread via a “new post” notification email! :wink:

 

We are trying to collect stories of people's experience with Brighthouse. Eventually we would like to make up a dossier.

 

We would like to know about how Brighthouse staff have treated you, particularly if you have got behind with payments.

 

We would also like to know if you have been pressurised to take out any insurance or optional service cover (OSC).

 

Furthermore we would like to know about problems you have had with goods from this company and how Brighthouse have handled repairs or replacements.

 

Here is the link to the thread to post your stories.

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/brighthouse/131337-brighthouse-horror.html

 

 

Please don't add your story to this thread. Use the thread in the link above.

 

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hello I'm new to this thread, I have had an account with BH for a couple of years and I have found them to be rude and nasty but I am not the type of person who will take threats and harassment lightly, I have form the offset told all the staff that I will not tolerate any rubbish from them and I also report any attitude to the head office, and this tends to shut them up, I have been told about their stupid idea of collecting and holding goods till you can pay for them, what a stupid idea, people need most of the goods that they sell and wouldn't look at this company as a viable option if they could buy elsewhere. As for intimidating people with or without children is deplorable. They have been told by me in no uncertain terms not to threaten me at all. They have called me a couple of times in the early days of my agreement and I have said that if you carry on ringing me then I will not pay a single penny and you can do what you like and I will see you in court, that I have found works for me. if anyone would like me to tell them where to go iI would quite happily do this for them, with great pleasure. This is 2012 and not 1912 where we should all be grateful for our lot in life those days are long since gone. X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello I'm new to this thread, I have had an account with BH for a couple of years and I have found them to be rude and nasty but I am not the type of person who will take threats and harassment lightly, I have form the offset told all the staff that I will not tolerate any rubbish from them and I also report any attitude to the head office, and this tends to shut them up, I have been told about their stupid idea of collecting and holding goods till you can pay for them, what a stupid idea, people need most of the goods that they sell and wouldn't look at this company as a viable option if they could buy elsewhere. As for intimidating people with or without children is deplorable. They have been told by me in no uncertain terms not to threaten me at all. They have called me a couple of times in the early days of my agreement and I have said that if you carry on ringing me then I will not pay a single penny and you can do what you like and I will see you in court, that I have found works for me. if anyone would like me to tell them where to go iI would quite happily do this for them, with great pleasure. This is 2012 and not 1912 where we should all be grateful for our lot in life those days are long since gone. X

 

(pst... check the date of the last post)

 

There is a sub-forum dedicated to these antics if you want to offer people helpful advice, check http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?164-BrightHouse-and-other-rent-to-own-Hire-Purchase-Stores

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...