Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all Just coming back to this Forum, as it helped me so much a few years back with ADCB/Moriarty. So I've had the circulars from IDR chasing Emirates NBD debt. They've been on and off over past few years, seem to be a run of letters, emails SMS and then go quiet, then start again.   A few months ago, same started with J&P, just a basic letter, email, sms asking to get in contact. Then last week I saw an email from Emirates NBD saying J&P were acting on their behalf. Up to this point, the main thrust of the letter seems to be please contact us, or contact ENBD about payment. Then I received a letter - I can't scan/upload it at this time but I will as soon as I can - which appears to be similar to what I've seen on other threads. Namely giving bank details of ENBD, saying they've been "instructed to pursue action", and saying they've enclosed a copy of Information Sheet, Reply Form in compliance of Pre-Action Protocol They state I have 30 days from date on letter to reply, and "if you fail to do so our client may have no option but to pursue further action against you". I'm of the view, as per advice on other threads and my experience with the other lender/company, to reply as per thread #5 in the main thread. On the basis that I wouldn't wish to give them ammunition by not replying or missing the opportunity. I'm aware that on some threads, in similar situation, one poster had been advised by sols not to reply and apparently J&P didn't progress from there, other than sending same requests. I feel these things are always down to the individual's choice, and I'm keen to see what others may have done/may be doing so will actively read other threads also.   Please feel free to ask if I can help with anything, or share any opinions, and in the meantime I'll get the uploads done ASAP.   Thanks again for everyone's help in the past, and hopefully the future, and good luck to all
    • No it remains your main statement but add a cover note stating its been updated  due to submitting too early. Head it statement to replace statement dated xxxxx
    • Thank you, so to confirm I’m going to send the statutory declaration tomorrow I have arranged to get a solicitor to witness this. Will the court then serve me with this other document via the post? How does it work exactly or do I plead not guilty with the stat-dec. in your experience and what you’ve seen on here before how likely do you think it will be that they accept the plea of guilty for those charges and then stick to 6 points and a fine?    I really appreciate your support and responses. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bankruptcy for LTD business


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6223 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anyone can help with this but I desperately need some

advice. We run a LTD company.Our old accountant completed our books in Feb 2006 and left us an invoice for £1637.36.

Due to money problems we have never paid him and to be fair he has never chased us - he has our phone numbers & email address even though we had moved. (He still has these books - we have never had a copy).

 

We now have a new accountant and he contacted the old one to get copies of our books. The old one said he was reluctant to do this as we hadn't paid him - fair enough. We told our new accountant that we hadn't paid him and he said not to worry about it.

Now this morning I have a letter stating if we don't pay the full amount by next friday he will commence bankruptcy proceedings against us as directors.

 

1. Can he do this - why isn't he threatening to take us to court instead?

2. Can we ask for time to pay? (I know its been over a year, but we do not have that sort of money at the moment)

3. How can he put interest on the amount - we never signed anything as far as I know & he hasn't broken it down.

Please help as I feel sick right now...

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a clever move, he knows that there is little point pursuing the Limited company for payment, however if he was instructed to do the accounts by as director of the company, then it still remains the company is the entity he must sue, UNLESS you provided him with an indemnity or other letter that advised his appointment was being personally underwritten by a/the directors. If he's not got this, he can whistle - his action is not competent.

 

Why not write back, explaining that you are prepared to offer a number of staged payments to clear the debt, however as he acted on behalf of the company, any action against the individual directors will be challenged as incompetent (after all, why go to the bother of being Ltd?).

 

Once he knows you know, it may help broker a deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. We have asked our new accountant to take a look at the letter (which wasn't sent by recorded delivery) to see if he can help.

I am 99% sure we did not sign an indemnity as Directors, however I cannot be sure. (I know we signed one for our overdraft & business loan with the bank).

It isn't that we wont pay, to be fair, we thought he would catch up with us sooner or later. Can I send a letter, asking for a copy of the invoice to perhaps delay a little bit. Also, what about our books that he has and we haven't had sight of since we gave them to him in November 2005!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd expect your bank to have that indemnity, but not your accountant. If you have his invoice, is it charged to the Ltd Co or a named director without reference to the Ltd co? If the former, he's shot himself in the foot big time!

 

You could write back (as the Ltd Co) saying the reason the account wasn't settled ages ago was because your books had not been returned, so the matter is still outstanding. Once you have these back, you will arrange for payment to be made.

 

He's not allowed to hold your financial records to ransom, and you could sue him for their return regardless!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Buzby, you have given me something to work on. I do have the invoice somewhere and I am sure it is made out to our company.

Thanks again, and once we get some bank charges back I will be making a donation to this amazing site!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent a letter today by recorded delivery basically asking for a copy of a signed indemnity from the Directors, a copy & breakdown of the invoice & our books/accounts that he had since Nov 2005.

I will let you know what happens!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh yes, can you tell?! Hopefully it will put him off for a bit as he said we had until 10.00am tomorrow morning to pay. I had an appointment with my new accountant on Tuesday, even swapped my shift, however I got stuck at work so didn't make it! Lets hope he doesn't have an indemnity letter....

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may also want to speak to Business Debtline on 0800 197 6026 as they specialise in advising sole traders & Ltd companies in relation to this type of thing; it's free & confidential ( no reflection on your excellent advice by the way Buzby! :) ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

tiaposy

Don't worry he can't make you Bankrupt.

 

I've been down this road with a Ltd Company that in the end I had to let go. They will try it on in the hope that they can get something out of you but they can't take you to Court for it.

 

If the invoice is to the Ltd. Co. - and it will be as the books are for the Ltd. Co. and it is the Ltd. Company your accountant would expect to pay him, then there is no way he can expect you to pay. The debt belongs to the company not you. Also as Busby says he cannot hold on to your books and is breaking the Law in doing so.

 

Have a good weekend and Don't Worry :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Powell & Dave44 - Thanks for your advice. I know he has signed for the letter this morning, so I shall wait & see what the postman brings. I am not too worried - have been down this road so many times with various debts, and the many joys of running our own business! Worrying wont change anything :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

His actions in retaining your books is surely theft, if you can get him to refuse to hand them back in writing, this will surely be proof enough.

 

I would personally try to end this amicably, he did you a service and should be paid (even in instalments if necessary), why make an enemy out of him. Karma and all that.

 

Barclaycard Student credit card £400 partial refund received, S.A.R -

Open & Direct Finance- extortionate, cca to Rockwell debt collection they ran away, now with Bryan Carter, no cca 17/03/08 sent back to Open

Pugsley v Littlwoods, have not received the signed credit agreement only quoting reg of 1983

Pugsley v Fashion World JD williams, 17/03 2008 Debt Managers returning file to JD williams as they could not supply the credit agreement

Capital one MCOL Settled in full

Smile lba settled in full

advice is given informally and without liability and without prejudice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

at first it would not have been theft, but now surely after they asked for them back it is

 

The actus reus of theft is usually defined as an unauthorised taking, keeping or using of another's property which must be accompanied by a mens rea of dishonesty and/or the intent to permanently deprive the owner or the person with rightful possession of that property or its use.

 

Barclaycard Student credit card £400 partial refund received, S.A.R -

Open & Direct Finance- extortionate, cca to Rockwell debt collection they ran away, now with Bryan Carter, no cca 17/03/08 sent back to Open

Pugsley v Littlwoods, have not received the signed credit agreement only quoting reg of 1983

Pugsley v Fashion World JD williams, 17/03 2008 Debt Managers returning file to JD williams as they could not supply the credit agreement

Capital one MCOL Settled in full

Smile lba settled in full

advice is given informally and without liability and without prejudice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. A prosecutor would have to prove intent - and that would be missing in this case. As an 'incentive' to pay on time, it's no different. Civil recovery would be the only route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to agree to disagree on this, but know the police are unlikely to act on it as a similar thing has happened to me. If the books become useless due to time, then the intent is there, as I said he needs to get the refusal in writing.

 

Barclaycard Student credit card £400 partial refund received, S.A.R -

Open & Direct Finance- extortionate, cca to Rockwell debt collection they ran away, now with Bryan Carter, no cca 17/03/08 sent back to Open

Pugsley v Littlwoods, have not received the signed credit agreement only quoting reg of 1983

Pugsley v Fashion World JD williams, 17/03 2008 Debt Managers returning file to JD williams as they could not supply the credit agreement

Capital one MCOL Settled in full

Smile lba settled in full

advice is given informally and without liability and without prejudice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I gather ( my OH is self employed as are several of our friends ) it's common practice for accountants to keep hold of the 'books' in the cases of non payment. I'm not sure of the legality of this practice but it's pretty widespread as it's referred to in the link below:

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 04 How To Deal With Business Debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACCOUNTANTS' BILLS

 

If you have an accountant who usually deals with your tax returns you may have a problem if you are not up to date with their bill. Sometimes accountants refuse to complete tax returns or give you back your books if they have not been paid. This can cause problems with HMRC if they have sent you an estimated tax bill that is too high.

  • If you cannot get your books back try to give HMRC a summary of your trading figures from any papers you have.
  • Tell HMRC why you have no books. Ask them to accept your estimate even if you have no papers to prove your figures.
  • Try to negotiate with your accountant to give your books back. They may agree if they can see you are in no position to make any sort of payment to them or you may be able to make an agreement for a part payment instead.

interesting maybe they have a get out of jail free card, although they probably deserve it for doing such an awful job, I'm studying accounts at the moment towards a conveyancing qualifications and it is very tedious.

 

 

 

What if My Accountant Refuses to Return My Books?

 

If you have not paid your accountant, then he or she may refuse to give your books back to you until the bill is paid. This is known as a lien.

 

Essentially, the accountant has the right to keep the books on which work has been carried out, and for which some or all of his or her fees have not been paid.

 

He/she should not be keeping books for which there is no debt due on the work done. A lien is not enforceable in bankruptcy or in liquidation situations.

 

You should contact your accountant and explain that you are unable to pay, and that the return of your books will help you put together some repayment proposals, which should result in a better offer to the accountant than would otherwise be possible.

 

This is particularly significant where there are income tax or VAT assessments to be dealt with, which could result in refunds.

 

You could take legal action to recover your books, but it is important that you get a professional opinion from a solicitor.

 

Barclaycard Student credit card £400 partial refund received, S.A.R -

Open & Direct Finance- extortionate, cca to Rockwell debt collection they ran away, now with Bryan Carter, no cca 17/03/08 sent back to Open

Pugsley v Littlwoods, have not received the signed credit agreement only quoting reg of 1983

Pugsley v Fashion World JD williams, 17/03 2008 Debt Managers returning file to JD williams as they could not supply the credit agreement

Capital one MCOL Settled in full

Smile lba settled in full

advice is given informally and without liability and without prejudice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...