Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

who should i be dealing with??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

oh my..

this is so confusing.

 

should i be dealing with Ruthbridge(DCA), Cabot or M&S financial services.

 

any advice

 

 

Hi french,

 

 

What are we referring to here?:???::???::???:

 

I think we need a few more details!

 

Please post your story here, and I'm sure somebody will help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh my..

this is so confusing.

 

should i be dealing with Ruthbridge(DCA), Cabot or M&S financial services.

 

any advice

 

In the absence of any details whatsoever... I'm guessing you have an outstanding amount on an account with M&S Financial Services that's been sold to Cabot that is now being chased up by Ruthbridge Limited on behalf of Cabot...??

help.gif

 

If Ruthbridge are chasing the account, in the absence of any details, all I can suggest is that you send them the CCA request letter, which is a legal request to be provided with a copy of the original credit agreement. The template letter can be found here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html#post162367

Add to the top of the letter, that you don't acknowledge any debt to their company, and that the £1 payment is not in anyway a payment to the alleged outstanding amount.

 

Make sure to include a P/O for £1 which is the statutory maximum payment for them to comply to the request, and make sure that you send it by recorded delivery so that you can prove that they received it and on what date/time.

 

Please post more details so that we can be of further assistance!

 

Good luck, regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruthbridge have been sending me letters for the last month asking me to phone them, and threatening bankruptcy and sending people around. they say they are working on behalf of Cabot financial europe who on behalf of M&S.

 

I have CCA Ruthbridge on 19 April 07, they have cashed the cheques against the the debt and failed to send the requested docuements.

they have defaulted on 12+2 rule. they have phoned and i have refused to speak to them.the lady managed to say before i hung up how can they send me the docuements in the given time and that they only send out template letters. today received template/standard letter asking me to phone them to discuss the correspondance. they obviously have not read the letter as i have asked them not to phone me. And have not ammended the £1 payment they have credited towards the debt. they are trying to chase a loan that I have no coresspondance since april 2001, my credit file states that M&S closed the file in 09/2001 listing as default.

 

apparently they are sending someone around in 14 days to discuss the debt.

 

I have also SAR Cabot.

 

I am not paying out a penny until or if they can prove that i owe the money.

 

is it possible that the loan is statute barred. the last letter i have from M&S on 17 April 01 and i did not receive a letter from ruthbridge untill 17 April 07? should i wait to see if they go 30 day criminal offence and then send them a letter stateing the limitation act for statute barred credit agreements or should i do that know?

 

this whole thing got me really worried but after reading other posts on this site i realise they are a bunch of bullies.

 

is there anything i have missed?

 

still it worries me what if they suceed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello again,

 

 

As long as you have not acknowledged the "alleged " debt in writing, or made a payment towards it since April '01, then it should be statute barred.

 

From now on do not speak to anybody on the phone regarding this matter! If they continue to phone, send the harassment letter. You want everything in writing. You need everything in writing for your records!

 

If somebody does come to your home, you do not have to speak to them at all! Ask them to leave. If they refuse, inform them they are now trespassing, and you will call the police! If they still refuse to leave, then call the police! Inform the police that you have a trespasser on your property, and there may be a breach of the peace!

 

 

Good luck, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have received another letter today from Ruthbridge. This time it had a different address from twickenham instead of teddington.

 

They still have not sent me my requested docuements but in the letter have said they are going to advise their client (Cabot) to pettition my bankruptcy and still have not returned the £1 payment for this from the debt to my application for my CCA, I now this is all bully boy tactics, should i write another letter referring to my past letters?

should i also send Cabot copies of all my correspondance ?

 

Ruthbridge have already broken a number of OFT fair trading guidlines, should i report them know or wait for 10 June?

 

12+2 day default 10 May

30day criminal offence 10 June

 

have SAR request Cabot 40 day deadline 4 July, but they have already cashed my £10 cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

French,

 

I am in the same position with a slightly older debt that has been through the exact same route. They will claim to have proof on the phone, but they will not be able to provide anything in writing. Once they go past the 12+2 days that the CCA gives them they haven't a leg to stand on. Do send the statute barred as well

 

You are probably dealing with the same delightful woman I am. They don't even use their real names, they are ****.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...