Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can we turn the tables?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6238 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've dealt with the banks with the help of this site, I've responded to the private car park ticket

 

With regards to your letter dated xxx. I do not have an account with you. You refer to a Civil Penalty Charge Notice being issued. This would infer that I entered a civil agreement with yourselves. I did not.

I assume you asked the DVLA for the details of the owner of the vehicle in question. Although I am the owner of the vehicle, I am not always the driver.

In addition, please make a note of my Terms and Conditions with regard to the administration of your letters.

If you write to me again, regarding this matter, it will trigger the acceptance of the fact that you will have to pay me an administration fee of £20 per letter. This is for my time and expenses.

Didn't hear any more from them.

 

I'm more annoyed about companies trying to bully us & chargeing for not paying by direct debit or not paying on time & snowballing our bills. & I'm fighting back more.

 

I noticed on this site other people using things like "If you write to me again, regarding this matter, it will trigger the acceptance of the fact that you will have to pay me an administration fee of £20 per letter. This is for my time and expenses."

 

& thought I should do the same. If companies can change their terms and conditions & level of service (like dropping TV channels) why can't the consumer?

 

I thought I'd write a general terms & conditions notice that I could include when things go wrong & I end up having to deal with companies who think they're god & have every right to my money if they decide.

 

Perhaps someone can advice me on the legality of including such text in a letter & advice any additions/changes - must be more legal than taking hundreds of pounds out of my account when I'm paid a day late.

 

Anyway here's what I came up with.

 

My Standard Terms and conditions and Charges for dealing with companies or idividuals.

 

 

When extra administration or communication is needed to deal with a company or individual

that is not a straight forward purchace of goods or services, dealing with a financial dispute,

or any other dispute that requires me to write a letter or e-mail, make a phone call, or where

I perform reasearch to resolve a matter, or clarify my legal position, an administration

charge or fee of £50 for each half day, or part thereof of my time spent dealing with an issue

will be chargeable.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) may be waived at my discression, if the issue is settled promptly.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) will be payable immidiately on demand and legal action may be taken to recover

these Charge(s) or fee(s) and any costs I occur in recovery action.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) are to cover my administration costs and loss of earnings in dealing with

companies or idividuals.

 

By responding or communicating with me in any way after you receive this you are accepting these

terms and conditions.

 

In these terms and conditions:-

 

'My' 'me' 'I' reffers to xxx, xx my address xx.

'companies' "company' 'idividuals' 'you' refers to the company or individual with which I am communicating.

 

 

Capital One Success after Letter asking for charges back;)

Alliance & Leicester Success after threatening court action :p

Abbey Sent Court Bundle, waiting for court date....

T-mobile Called, sent letter & called again - Charges Dropped:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ArthurP

I was having an issue with GUS home shopping, I think it was Great Universal.

 

I had bought a music system with an extended warranty. They sent the wrong system so I had to re-order all over again with a new warranty too.

 

They hounded me for months to pay for the first warranty, which was obviously invalid due to the mix up.

 

In any case, they eventually threatened bailifs to my home and I sent a letter back threatening my own action and billed them £100 for my trouble thus far in dealing with it.

 

They apologised and knocked £100 off my account. I then settled the rest and closed the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it. But it doesn't extend to at least 70 clauses, 3 pages and the print isn't too small to read. Although if I do Ctrl-Minus in my browser 3 times - yep thats the right size!:)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The scary part is that, besides the £50 per half-day, that seems reasonable. Even the method of execution is probably sound - after all, if the banks can say that you gave consent by your actions, then turnabout is fair play.

 

At the £50 per half-day, it will be seen as excessive, since administrative labour is counted in units of quarter- or half-hours (not days), and the court will only award £9.25/hour anyway. £5 per half-hour you might get away with, but at £50 per half-day it's almost certainly a penalty, equally unenforceable as those the banks impose. Good thinking, though :)

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At the £50 per half-day, it will be seen as excessive, since administrative labour is counted in units of quarter- or half-hours (not days), and the court will only award £9.25/hour anyway. £5 per half-hour you might get away with, but at £50 per half-day it's almost certainly a penalty, equally unenforceable as those the banks impose. Good thinking, though :)

 

Why should it be classed as a penelty, my solicitor charges £140 an hour, and all it is is time for fact finding reseach, letter writing, etc. :)

Good luck to each and all.

All comments are personal opinion only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should it be classed as a penelty, my solicitor charges £140 an hour, and all it is is time for fact finding reseach, letter writing, etc. :)

 

Because that is a service they are performing at your request, and (hopefully) to your benefit.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I see where meagain is comming from, I disagree in that it is you doing the work that you are charging for, not billing someone for something they have done.. Think of it as being self-employed.

Then again, the tax-man will just take the lot. lol

Good luck to each and all.

All comments are personal opinion only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I see where meagain is comming from, I disagree in that it is you doing the work that you are charging for, not billing someone for something they have done..

 

You would not have needed to do the work if it were not for the "something they have done", hence it is a cost, not a service. Saying you will charge someone for costs you have incurred is a contractual penalty, which is not allowed. You can only pass on a reasonable value of the cost itself.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

... I think my time has greater value than that.

 

You and the rest of the world ;-)

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At the £50 per half-day, it will be seen as excessive, since administrative labour is counted in units of quarter- or half-hours (not days), and the court will only award £9.25/hour anyway. £5 per half-hour you might get away with, but at £50 per half-day it's almost certainly a penalty, equally unenforceable as those the banks impose. Good thinking, though :)

 

Nahh, your wrong.

 

£50.00 per half day = 12 hours @ £4.17.

 

Should be £55.50 per half day calculated @£9.25 per hour. :p

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nahh, your wrong.

 

£50.00 per half day = 12 hours @ £4.17.

 

£50 per half day = 4 hours @ £12.50. Or to be really picky, 3h42m @ £13.51.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Standard Terms and Conditions and Charges for dealing with companies or individuals.

 

 

When extra administration or communication is needed to deal with a company or individual

that is not a straightforward purchase of goods or services, dealing with a financial dispute,

or any other dispute that requires me to write a letter or e-mail, make a phone call, or where

I perform research to resolve a matter, or clarify my legal position, an administration

charge or fee of £50 for each half day, or part thereof of my time spent dealing with an issue

will be chargeable.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) may be waived at my discretion, if the issue is settled promptly.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) will be payable immediately on demand and legal action may be taken to recover

these Charge(s) or fee(s) and any costs I occur in recovery action.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) are to cover my administration costs and loss of earnings in dealing with

companies or individuals.

 

By responding or communicating with me in any way after you receive this you are accepting these

terms and conditions.

 

In these terms and conditions:-

 

'My' 'me' 'I' refers to xxx, xx my address xx.

'companies' "company' 'individuals' 'you' refers to the company or individual with which I am communicating.

 

Mr Picky here

A few spellings/typos you might want to address ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondered when someone would pick up on the typos!

 

So I'd get away with this if I chnge the amount hey?

£50 per half day excessive. I bet judges get paid more than £9.25 per hour! Fact is if I have to take half a day (or part thereof) off work to deal with comapnies, I loose at least £50. That's the real world.

 

Guess I'll change that bit to £5 per half hour. Mind you my half day is 7am to 12 midday. 7am - 11am Reasearch 11am - 11:30 Letter writing. 11:30-12:00 confirming reasearch & sending letter.

 

Thats 10 x half hours @ £5 / half hour = £ 50 ?

 

Would I get away with this?

Capital One Success after Letter asking for charges back;)

Alliance & Leicester Success after threatening court action :p

Abbey Sent Court Bundle, waiting for court date....

T-mobile Called, sent letter & called again - Charges Dropped:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'd get away with this if I chnge the amount hey?

 

Maybe. ISTR at least one other person here doing something similar (along the lines of "if you charge me, I will invoice you for the charge and my costs"), not sure how they got on.

 

 

£50 per half day excessive. I bet judges get paid more than £9.25 per hour!

 

I'll bet they do, but you're not a judge. No court in the land will award a lay person £100 per day in costs for small claims.

 

Fact is if I have to take half a day (or part thereof) off work to deal with comapnies, I (aargh!) lose with one o at least £50. That's the real world.

 

Fact is, you would then have to prove that loss to the court. It's not enough to say "I get paid £12/hour, and have to take 4 hours off to do this". If someone has breached a contract with you, you can't bill them at your usual service rate. To get beyond the £9.25, you have to prove that you actually lost money - as in it was a statistical certainty that you would have been paid but were not.

 

Mind you my half day is 7am to 12 midday. 7am - 11am Reasearch 11am - 11:30 Letter writing. 11:30-12:00 confirming reasearch & sending letter.

 

That's excessive again. Out of all of that time, you can only pass on the half-hour for drafting the letter (you've hit that spot-on, though - generally accepted billing practice is half an hour for a letter). The idea is that once you have done the research once, you do not need to do it again. Billing for further time for things such as "walking to the PO" is taking the mickey, though. On the other hand, if you serve the letters by recorded or special delivery, again that is a cost to you that you would not otherwise have incurred, which you could reasonably pass on (but if you ask someone to pay you £5 for SD, make sure you actually do use SD).

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone is missing something here.

 

You can claim £9.25 per hour for your preparation of the case. ie research and clerical in your own "spare" time.

 

Attendance at court would have an effect on your earnings which would be claimed as "Loss of Earnings". If your losses are equal to £100.00 per day it would be reasonable to claim £50.00 for half a days loss. You must be able to prove the loss with documentation.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...