Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA's and Dave against the world !!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just had RBS on the phone........and I answered it :)

 

Seem they are moving on the missold PPI, the chap asked a few questions about how it was sold and why I thought it wasnt suitable.

 

he said He'll get back to me (whatever that means).

 

i'm waiting :)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi guys.....

 

just got a reply from RBS re the PPI.........NO! looks like its a complaint to the FOS, FSA, OFT and anyone else who will listen.

 

Got a letter from Equidebt as well........anyone whos been following this thread will know that this one is to do with my MBNA debt that they "bought"

 

If I reply within 7 days they can offer me a "substantial" discount.....hmmmmm

 

Considering that they were recently talking about court action and charging orders............I think that they may have got hold of some information from somewhere

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys.....

 

just got a reply from RBS re the PPI.........NO! looks like its a complaint to the FOS, FSA, OFT and anyone else who will listen.

 

Got a letter from Equidebt as well........anyone whos been following this thread will know that this one is to do with my MBNA debt that they "bought"

 

If I reply within 7 days they can offer me a "substantial" discount.....hmmmmm

 

Considering that they were recently talking about court action and charging orders............I think that they may have got hold of some information from somewhere

 

Dave

 

Hi Dave I am wondering if just maybe MBNA are now actually looking at their agreements and just maybe they are seeing that some are unenforceable, I had MBNA at court waiting for Part 18 disclosure of agreement etc when they suddenly settled out of court, cleared the debt and gave me £1600 as compensation for my trouble. Of course all I got on paper was account cleared and closed we will not be communicating again rubbish. I am gonna keep that letter in a very safe place knowing MBNA.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Dave!

 

Considering that they were recently talking about court action and charging orders............I think that they may have got hold of some information from somewhere

 

I have a feeling many of them will be coming to the same conclusion, i.e. all of the bankers who have Shredded the Original Statutory Regulated Credit Agreements, and are instead trying to Enforce by relying on Unreadable Frankenstein Harry Black Microfiche Scans, dubious Photoshop Wizardry and/or Creatively blurred Photocopies.

 

That little game has been rumbled. See Practice Direction Part 16 7.3

 

THIS PRACTICE DIRECTION SUPPLEMENTS CPR PART 16

 

7.3 Where a claim is based upon a written agreement:

 

(1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing, and

 

(2) any general conditions of sale incorporated in the contract should also be attached (but where the contract is or the documents constituting the agreement are bulky this practice direction is complied with by attaching or serving only the relevant parts of the contract or documents).

 

As I keep saying like a stuck record...only the Original Agreement will do!

 

No Original banker? Oh dear, then you are up Poop Creek without a Paddle...or a Canoe for that matter!

 

...and what about the Anti-Money Laundering issues! Are they not supposed to keep Originals for 6 Years after an Account has been closed?

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a known fact that MBNA shredded many of their agreements so if they don't come up with them, that's probably the reason, no agreement...No debt.....also, anyone with MBNA agreements sold to Cabot should check whether or not they are designed around IRISH law within the agreement too...not sure what that was all about, but they won't stand up in an English or Scottish Court that's for sure as the Cabot Fan Club can prove catagorically - can't we Cabot ? :D

 

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a small problem...........(no not that :) )......MBNA have a clearly legible and exact copy of the original.........(edit by dave).

 

But it seems from Dpick's post above and the following posts, that ONLY the original will do!............has anyone achieved any success with this approach?

 

To be honest I cant see "most" judges letting you off with that one.....

 

even without an agreement, contract law must come into it somewhere....They can prove that they lent you the money, and that you havent paid it back.............I'm sure that Equity would have a small part to play.

 

Any thoughts ?

 

 

ps Sarah got your PM and will investigate :)

 

Dave

Edited by davefirewalker

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone with MBNA agreements sold to Cabot should check whether or not they are designed around IRISH law within the agreement too...not sure what that was all about, but they won't stand up in an English or Scottish Court that's for sure

 

Would that apply to all MBNA agreements, including ones sold to other DCAs?

 

How would i find out if Irish law applies?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a small problem...........(no not that :) )......MBNA have a clearly legible and exact copy of the original.........(edit by dave).

 

But it seems from Dpick's post above and the following posts, that ONLY the original will do!............has anyone achieved any success with this approach?

 

To be honest I cant see "most" judges letting you off with that one.....

 

even without an agreement, contract law must come into it somewhere....They can prove that they lent you the money, and that you havent paid it back.............I'm sure that Equity would have a small part to play.

 

You could wll be right I had already paid back more that I had received from my card.

 

Any thoughts ?

 

 

ps Sarah got your PM and will investigate :)

 

Dave

 

Hi Dave as you say the copy must be complete and legible, My copy from MBNA was of the front of an original Bank of Scotland agreement, I suspect that the prescribed terms were on another document or back of the agreement that MBNA did not have this was what I was forcing disclosure of through Part 18 all that MBNA produced to the court originally before Part 18 order was this copy and latest MBNA terms and conditions.

 

dpick:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dpick - out of interest - had MBNA defaulted you for this BOS card?

 

Hi redsue no MBNA did not default me, sell on to DCA the only thing they did was set their Indian call centre Global advantage to try to collect the arrears not even try to collect the full amount.

 

dpick:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would that apply to all MBNA agreements, including ones sold to other DCAs?

 

How would i find out if Irish law applies?

 

Look at the agreement and see which law it says it relates to English or Irish :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the agreement and see which law it says it relates to English or Irish :D

 

don't have it, DCA only sent an application form.

 

should i ask MBNA directly for the agreement?

 

2 accounts have been sold to DCA, i have a CCJ for each and a charging order on one.

 

last year, MBNA paid me charges back and paid interest at the statement rate. Still chasing them for the PPI which was more than the charges. Application form clearly ticked 'NO' and they've said they have no record of the 'conversation' in which i later agreed to have this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't have it, DCA only sent an application form.

 

should i ask MBNA directly for the agreement?

 

2 accounts have been sold to DCA, i have a CCJ for each and a charging order on one.

 

last year, MBNA paid me charges back and paid interest at the statement rate. Still chasing them for the PPI which was more than the charges. Application form clearly ticked 'NO' and they've said they have no record of the 'conversation' in which i later agreed to have this.

 

Search any documents you have, if not get a copy from MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave-you legend!

 

Sorry to barge in like this but I am really interested to know if it is safe to chase creditors for mis-sold PPi even when you're going through their torture...(sorry, procedure), for recovering debt? Tifo's post got me thinking. I've been holding back a bit on a couple of major PPI claims as I didn't want to throw an almighty spanner in the works.

 

Any ideas?

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave-you legend!

 

Sorry to barge in like this but I am really interested to know if it is safe to chase creditors for mis-sold PPi even when you're going through their torture...(sorry, procedure), for recovering debt? Tifo's post got me thinking. I've been holding back a bit on a couple of major PPI claims as I didn't want to throw an almighty spanner in the works.

 

Any ideas?

 

xx

 

My personal opinion FWIW is that a Claim for missold PPI is a separate issue from a claim for charges. You can of course lump them together, but the best way forward would be individual actions. so nothing wrong in pursuing both at the same time.

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have gone for missold PPI against a credit card - it is highly relevant to the amount they are claiming, particularly once you add on the interest they have charged on it as well, and in our case almost wipes the debt out. Stalemate at the moment - think their court claim has been struck out but nothing in writing as yet.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all, new bloke here and I’ve just finished the entire thread and I’m knackered.:-( Like most of the threads I’ve read this one has helped to move me away from some of my more pessimistic ruminations and encouraged a little hope and changed my perspective. As the estimable Mr firewalker describes at the very beginning of this thread, he hung back for a month or more just reading the posts and absorbing the ideas that are so freely shared amongst you all and I’ve been behaving in a similar fashion. I have a mountain to climb but I might just do it with the help of this forum and so I’ll begin my own thread soon with the first of my battles, (there are many).;-)

And as an aside, if I’m allowed, a note to Dave FW, during the course of this thread you have stated on a few occasions that you might have a manic/depressive thing going on well it seems unlikely from you correspondence that that could be the case, far too comprehensible and not anywhere as chaotic as would be the case if you were bi-polar. It seems that your mood is cycling and, from what you say, it’s predictable and, I have to say, the booze doesn’t help. Alcohol is a central nervous system depressant and very good at its job, it makes you depressed. Just go back over the thread and note how many times you remark upon drinking too much followed by a report of your mood retarding. God knows I’m not moralising, I’m a Geordie with a genetic predisposition for brown ale and supporting hopeless football clubs, more to be pitied than scorned eh:!:

Enough with the preaching already! Drink, don’t drink, just stay around long enough to continue the thread, I’m agog and you’ve had me up all night.

Best wishes

Dogs

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could the mighty Dave take a look at this please :|

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/153704-could-someone-take-look.html#post1635763

 

You've been a bit quiet mate, are you OK?

 

Ive had a look at that and posted my thoughts.....

 

yes things have been a bit quiet here......just dealing with barclaycard at the moment.

 

I must admit to being a bit lax...I normally post my goings on as they happen, however things seem to have slowed to a crawl, and not much progress has been made, and it didnt seem to warrant posting. But in thinking about it isnt this the way things normally transpire, they try to wear you down.

 

Had a reply from them on friday stating that the offer of total write off still stands, and he couldnt understand why I am asking him for money...:)

 

So I wrote a two page letter explaining YET AGAIN his position........

 

but I NEED a holiday (doesnt look like one is going to happen this year) so I reduced the ammount asked for if he pays up straight away (unlikely)

 

Dear Mr barclaycardshark

 

I am in receipt of your letter of the nth July and received here on nth July. The contents of which have been noted.

 

You say I am asking for the return of interest and amounts not specified. On looking through my correspondence, I have found your answer (nth May) to my letter of the nth May in which my claim was laid out, so you must already have knowledge of and realise the basis of my claim and the amount that I am asking for. This again can only be seen as an attempt at trying to confuse, confound and delay the issues pending.

 

You also again state that the comments of the court in the Rankine case are brought to my attention. This case has very little to do with the issues surrounding my claim, and I still see it as an attempt at intimidation. Also I do not appear to be making any claim in relation to S78 of the CCA1974. That section only deals with my right to receive a copy of the agreement, and defaults for non compliance.

 

I however am making claims regarding S60-65 and S127 of the Act along with various other sections.

 

At the risk of repeating myself, I will again lay out my claim. Please read carefully

 

1 you do not have an enforceable agreement. The agreement is missing all the prescribed terms. As such any judge would be precluded from issuing an enforcement order. They would HAVE to find the agreement unenforceable

(please see the consumer credit act 1974 S127(3) )

 

2 Because the agreement is unenforceable and is improperly executed, the terms and conditions have never had legal effect. You have NEVER had the right to charge interest, or to vary the agreement terms, or to do anything else.

 

3 Any payment of interest by me was paid in the mistaken belief that you had a fully compliant and legally enforceable regulated agreement.

 

It was held in Wilson & others v Secretary of State [2003] UKHL40 that a regulated agreement that is missing or has misstated any of the prescribed terms is unenforceable against the debtor, and that the creditor loses all rights to money not already paid. The debtors rights are unaffected and they may continue to enforce the agreement. I suggest that (if you haven't already) you read the whole judgement as it is a bit of an eye opener. Also I suggest that you re-read Francis Bennions thoughts on S.127 as copied here from his website..............

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 s 127(3)

 

As the draftsman of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 I would like to thank Dr Richard Lawson

for his interesting and well-argued article (30 August 2003) on Wilson v First County Trust

Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, [2003] 4 All ER 97.

 

Dr Lawson may be interested to know that I included the provision in question (section

127(3)) entirely on my own initiative. It seemed right to me that if the creditor company

couldn’t be bothered to ensure that all the prescribed particulars were accurately included in

the credit agreement it deserved to find it unenforceable, and that the court should not have

power to relieve it from this penalty. Nobody queried this, and it went through Parliament

without debate. I’m glad the House of Lords has now vindicated my reasoning and confirmed

that nobody’s human rights were infringed.

(your offer of writing of the debt does not now seem quite as generous as at first sight as you are not doing anything that you would not be forced to do in any case)

 

It was also found in Sempra Metals v HMRC that restitution is now available in common law for money paid in mistake and that compound interest is available as a just remedy for the time value of the money lost

 

Therefore..........I now claim the return of said interest, totalling £4k+ this being the sum of the interest debited to the account, and interest on that compounded at your standard monthly rate of 1.527% (calculated on a daily basis) Please see attached schedule.

 

I have used the formula (1+rate)^time x amount, for the compound interest element

 

(The calculations are not very accurate, but are near enough. They are an under-estimate rather than an over. If you have the facility to do it properly could you please recalculate it and let me have a copy.)

 

The compound interest on the principal amount of £4k+ stands at £9k+ giving a total claim of £13k+ (nearly £14k) this amount is growing on a daily basis!

 

Also as the agreement is improperly executed and unenforceable any rights you may have thought you had to pass my data onto third parties do not exist, and any data passed to credit reference agencies should be withdrawn in that not only is it wholly inaccurate but would cause real and tangible harm and be of detriment to myself. You have previously received numerous request under S10 of the Data Protection Act 1998, to stop processing and not to start processing data or to pass that data on to third parties. I hope that you have acted upon those requests. To avoid the expense and time involved in going to court I will be prepared to accept 60% of what is now claimed (£8k+). on condition that a cheque is forwarded immediately However if you do not accept these terms I shall pursue you for the full amount

 

I expect a reply or a cheque by return

 

 

----------------------------------------

 

So thats the state of play at the moment...just waiting for a reply before i take the BIG plunge

 

rgds to all

 

Dave

Edited by davefirewalker

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all, new bloke here and I’ve just finished the entire thread and I’m knackered.:-( Like most of the threads I’ve read this one has helped to move me away from some of my more pessimistic ruminations and encouraged a little hope and changed my perspective. As the estimable Mr firewalker describes at the very beginning of this thread, he hung back for a month or more just reading the posts and absorbing the ideas that are so freely shared amongst you all and I’ve been behaving in a similar fashion. I have a mountain to climb but I might just do it with the help of this forum and so I’ll begin my own thread soon with the first of my battles, (there are many).;-)

And as an aside, if I’m allowed, a note to Dave FW, during the course of this thread you have stated on a few occasions that you might have a manic/depressive thing going on well it seems unlikely from you correspondence that that could be the case, far too comprehensible and not anywhere as chaotic as would be the case if you were bi-polar. It seems that your mood is cycling and, from what you say, it’s predictable and, I have to say, the booze doesn’t help. Alcohol is a central nervous system depressant and very good at its job, it makes you depressed. Just go back over the thread and note how many times you remark upon drinking too much followed by a report of your mood retarding. God knows I’m not moralising, I’m a Geordie with a genetic predisposition for brown ale and supporting hopeless football clubs, more to be pitied than scorned eh:!:

Enough with the preaching already! Drink, don’t drink, just stay around long enough to continue the thread, I’m agog and you’ve had me up all night.

Best wishes

Dogs

 

Thanks for the "compliments" this thread has certainley brought some interesting ideas to the surface.....and yes I know my drinking doesn't help...it seems to at the time though.

 

However and on a more personal note I seem to be sliding back down to a more deppresive state over the last few weeks. I need to buck myself up.

 

This thread just started out as a sort of personal "blog" so I could keep track of what was going on and to take onboard new ideas...it sort of ballooned from there :)

 

I will try to be around for a little while longer :)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave,

 

nice to hear you're still keeping up the fight!

 

You're an inspiration to me, and have helped me enormously. We all get our down times, so just look after you and keep doing your stuff. I doubt there are many on here that don't succumb to depression in any form when dealing with debt and the onslaught of creditors, dca's and the other riff-raff that get in on our misery.

 

I still think you're a legend!

 

Best wishes mate,

 

xx

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...