Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bluejay v HSBC


bluejay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

When I learnt that I could reclaim bank charges I got straight on the case and discovered that HSBC had levied approximatley £3000 in charges. Luckily enough I am do most of my banking on-line and I am also able to access my statements on-line. When I was looking I also discovered between the two accounts there were five months of statements missing (end of 2001 and beginning of 2002). So I have written to them and as per the advise that I have been given and sent a cheque for £10. All is well so far, what I am beginning to worry about though is that I sent the letter on the 15th March 2007 and advised them they have 40 days (I used a standard template). Firstly is that 40 working days or just 40 days and what happens come the 25th/26th of this month if they have not responded??

 

I am confident that I will be able to resolve this issue with HSBC judging by some of the threads that I have read here, and I am prepared to stick with it until the end.

 

Can anyone advise the next move, should write and give them more time or should I just hit them with the bill for £3000 and forget the 5 missing statements?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Bluejay

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hiya Blue, Calendar days not working days, heres the thread for non compliance just in case you need it;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

You could start your claim now with your preliminary letter and LBA using the information you have because you can add and correct your schedule up to the point you file your claim with the court so could add the missing charges as long as HSBC get the statements to you within 28 days.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great news thanks Pete, what is the best way to present it do I literally just need to show the date and the charge in the first instance and submit that to them, I have already laid it out on a spreadsheet for my own purposes.

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best way to do your schedule is to use the CAG spreadsheet, simply because if you do need help or advice we know what we are doing with these sheets.

 

As far as your claim is concerned you need to show each individual charge as it appears on your statement i.e. date, description and value and you need to have a logical calculations for both overdraft and statutory interest that can be checked to confirm the value of your claim before they make an offer. HSBC and their solicitors are used to the CAG sheets and we have had no problems with claims submitted on these.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Pete, unfortunatley I am unable to access the spreadsheet, the link does not seem to be working. Unfortunatley I don't use Excel but I am using MS Works.

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Blue

 

It should work with Works as that is what Ive got, if you still get stuck or have no further luck let me know - maybe I could email you mine or something!

:-x Kennsignton Mortage Company

:-x GE Captial

:-x Welcome Car Finance

Link to post
Share on other sites

bluejay - did you try getting missing statements using this method:

INTERNET BANKING WEBSITE: -

HSBC INTERNET BANKING

 

HOW TO OBTAIN YOUR STATEMENTS ON LINE: -

Click on “My Accounts” choose the account that you wish to deal with and then click on “My Statements” this will give you online access to up to 6 years of statements. (Repeat for each account and use a separate spreadsheet for each account).

 

Hint: - Watch out for the moving "Prev" button it is replaced by "Next" which takes you back to where you started :rolleyes:

 

 

also, have you seen this:

Spreadsheet Links Not Working: Here Are Some Alternatives(1 Viewing)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help guys, Laterlus, unfortunatley that is where they are missing from and as I never was very good at retaining paper documents I have no hard copy either, so I am having to rely on HSBC to send them to me! Mind you thatis not looking too good as the 40 day deadline is tomorrow and still nothing in the post, so it looks like I will have to send them another letter and hope they pull their fingers out!

 

Ok the links - on the VAMPIRESS'S CHAMBER one where is the information saved as I do not want to be putting this kind of data in the public domain. And to be honest I would rather work with these figures offline.

 

Unfortunatly of the other links they either don't work or they are on excel and I only have access to works :( Doesn't look like I am having much luck eh!!

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent thanks all, through various posts I found a program that will allow me to use excel spreadsheets on my PC without excel so that is all sorted, I have filled them in and all I have to do now is double check that the figures add up. Unfortunatley I am still without all of my statements and as I have not heard a whisper from the bank if they do not arrive in todays post then I will be sending them the letter that gives them another week, plus the preliminary letter asking for my money back. SO fingers crossed. Let you know what happens.

 

Bluejay

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck bluejay, it'll be worth it in the long run :D

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Well I sent my Non-Compliance letter and Prelim letter on the 27th, just checked and both letters were delivered on the 30th. I am keeping my fingers crossed but my main worry now is what if they do not respond to the non-compliance letter? Having never been in this situation before I have absolutly no clue as to what to do!!!!

 

OK now i am really confused - I have just noticed that the DPA letter should have been sent to Leeds and not 8 Canada Sq in London, is this going to cause a big problem or will they forward the initial letter internally? I got the original address from the Moneysavingexpert website.

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew, thats a relief!!! I thought I was going to have to start again! Thanks for that, I just hope that they come up with the goods!

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

At last, my statements have finally arrived!!!! Having had a quick sift through them I have found that I am a month out on one of the charges, is this likely to cause a problem, it was the same year I just stated June instead of July!

 

As with online there are also five months worth of statements missing, anybody have any idea why? Could it be because the account was possibly unused at the time seems a bit odd as it was between October 2001 and March 2002? I am going to call on Tuesday and see if anyone can shed any light on the matter.

 

The other question I have is that as I sent the request for this information off in mid march should they not have provided me with statements dating back 6 years from then? They have sent 6 years worth from beginning of May 01!

 

Thanks

 

bluejay

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

there's differing opinions on sola - banks view is 6 years b ack from date you file a claim and will argue older ones - up to you if you want to try for them - peeps who hold out generally get them - but it's a tussle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK wel today is the day that HSBC are due to write their 14 days are up. I take it if I don't get a letter from the then I just go ahead with the next stage??? Last letter sent was the Prelim

 

Thanks

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

At long last, I have finally received a response from HSBC. Don't get too excited though it is only a letter acknowledging my Prelim and the fact that they will investigate!.

 

Problem is all along I have been refering to both my accounts and when they sent the statements out one letter and cheque generated statements for both of these, but in this recent letter they only refer to one account number - any thoughts?

 

Also as I said this is a response to my Prelim that I sent on the 27 April, and as the time has expired I have already sent the LBA and their time expires on the 1st June, I take it that I continue to follow the procedure along the original time line?

 

Many thanks for your help, sorry if this is a bit garbled but I have just woken up from a Night shift!!

 

Thanks Bluejay

HSBC (£3722.80) MCOL Filed 12th June 07

transfered to Horsham County Court AQ dispensed with but fee still payable. AQ fee payed and added to claim. Case allocated to small claims track - due to be heard 30th August 07 - 2nd Nudge to DG sent (04/08/07)

Virgin Media (Complete Incompetance and refund of bank charges) - Letter to MD Customer Care - sent 24th May 2007 - resolved, refunded and 9 months free TV

 

British Credit Trust - VT to be started

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Blue, yes carry on with your claim using your time frame, your only interested in offer's.

 

Uncle Colins investigations can last around 10 weeks if not longer, by that time you should have a court date and be on the home straight to getting an offer from HSBC's Solicitors and your money back.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...