Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks Andy, There will be money left as they own their house. That's why I was thinking it may be cheaper to pay off the debts now, with a discount, rather than in full when the time comes.
    • No hard or fast rules ...if you have referred to it or intend to refer to it and rely on a document as evidence it goes on the list as an exhibit. No you can raise that within your statement but remember that sec 69 is at the discretion of the court a judge may allow the full amount claimed or reduce it to a lower % or none at all. Yes the claimant must serve their N265 on you...any document on theirs that you do not have you can request a copy and then use in your statement. Will it assist your defence ?
    • Hi all, I have previously been helped by the wonderful people on these forums, which helped me out of debt and to a much stronger position that I am in today, for which I am eternally grateful. My debts were all cleared, I now have no debt (apart from a mortgage) and an excellent credit file. I did also show my gratitude with a donation, which even if it helps just one other person out of spiralling debt, it would have been worth it. Sadly, my elderly parents did also run up some debts a few years ago, some through loans and some through credit cards. A few years ago, my father had a medical episode which has left him paralysed on one side of his body and now is confined to a wheelchair, and is pretty much non verbal (he can only manage a handful of words, and gets confused easily). I'm seriously not sure how far any County Court Action would get against him due to his current state, if any of the DCAs were to proceed down that route. Luckily nonw have tried, but can only think that any action would be discontinued by a judge. Before his medical episode he did set up a payment plan with some of the DCAs that were chasing him, which have continused being paid to this day from his bank account. They are literally minimum amounts, but obviously these actions have kept those debts current. However, some of the other debts have since become statutory barred due to the time elapsed since the last COA. My mum does have Power of Attorney over his financial affairs so can act on his behalf, with me as backup if god forbid anything happens to my mum. Their wills are set up for everything to go to the other should either of them pass away, and then to their children upon the passing of both of them, with myself being named as the executor on both of their wills. I have recently been reading up on the role of an executor, and part of the duties is to pay any outstanding liabilities before distributing the remainder of the estate. I have seen, in several instances, of a recommendation of posting about any death in the local newspaper column and the gazette to limit any future liabilities as executor in case of any debts that are unknown to myself. But this does lead me onto the debts I do know about. Am I right in thinking that the current debts that my dad has been making token payments on would have to be repaid in full to the DCAs upon his death? If that is the case, is it worth negotiating a full and final settlement, with a discount, on his behalf now? And with the debts that are statutory barred, am I correct in presuming that they would not need to be paid upon my dad's death as they wouldn't be legally enforcable in court? Thanks in advance for all of your help!
    • Hello AndyOrch For the n265 please would the below list of documents be sufficient ? 1. Pre-Action protocols. Claimant confirmation that they have not complied or have only partially complied (last page of claimants N181 Direction Questionnaire) Dated 16/04/2024 2. Copy of the Lease - Dated 4th September 1998 3. Statement of account (up to 1st Feb 2024) - Dated 20/02/2024 (This shows a slightly different balance to the one included in the Claim form as theirs was only up to 24th Jan 2024) 4. CPR 31.14 Request - Dated 28/02/2024   With regards to the Claimants claim for interest under Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 where the amount is incorrectly calculated due to the account balance and also appears to be duplicated, should I list their POC ? Additionally should I include any e-mail exchanges (I don't have all as some went to junk and auto deleted due to an issue with my e-mail account and I was reliant on my phone for seeing e-mails) ? I don't have the last e-mail that was sent prior to the claim being issued. I guess that I can ask the claimant for a copy of this one ? The claimant has refused to action the CPR 31.14 request.  Regarding the Section 20 notices relating to the major works, should I include if we have a copy ? Is there anything else that I should include in the list relevant to our defence ? Will the claimant send us a similar list via N265 ? They did include a Continuation Sheet with their N244 giving a background of the case. Just wondering how we know all of the documents that they will rely on.   As always really appreciate any help and guidance that you can provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apologies if I have posted this in the wrong thread (if it is, could a Moderator kindly move it to the correct place :) )

 

After I CCA Barclaycard I have received a copy of my original application form (Below) and nothing else.

 

bcoriginalappilactionfoew8.th.jpg

 

Am I right in saying that this in not an enforcable signed credit agreement, but just an application form. Or am I barking up the wrong tree :confused:

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi Bog

 

Unfortunately what you have uploaded is far too small for anybody to read. You need to go to photobucket.com and open a free account, then upload your image there and link back to it here.

 

That way you should be able to let people on here see a bigger and better image, and no doubt you will then get some opinions on it.

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bog

 

Unfortunately what you have uploaded is far too small for anybody to read. You need to go to photobucket.com and open a free account, then upload your image there and link back to it here.

 

That way you should be able to let people on here see a bigger and better image, and no doubt you will then get some opinions on it.

 

Rob

 

Done :) - Now much bigger!

 

Cheers for the info!

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies if I have posted this in the wrong thread (if it is, could a Moderator kindly move it to the correct place :) )

 

After I CCA Barclaycard I have received a copy of my original application form (Below) and nothing else.

 

bcoriginalappilactionfoew8.th.jpg

 

Am I right in saying that this in not an enforcable signed credit agreement, but just an application form. Or am I barking up the wrong tree :confused:

 

There are some issues with this agreement - if you start your own thread, then post a link to it back here, I'll share it with you there;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some issues with this agreement - if you start your own thread, then post a link to it back here, I'll share it with you there;

 

Thanks Car2403, new thread started here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/132464-barclaycard-enforcable-credit-agrreement.html#post1393784

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a problem with Citi Cards and requested a copy of the consumer credit agreement I sent the first request (as outlined by this site - thanks guys) on the 22nd september 2007 and included the £1 cheque as advised.

 

They failed to respond so i sent another request on the 11th of Oct 2007 with another £1 cheque, still no response, so I sent a 'default' letter (again as outlined on this site) on the 25th October 2007. I then sent them a Subject Access Request on the 19th December, to which they have not responded. But, they finally sent a copy of my original application form on the 28th February 2008. shown below...

 

They have charged me additional charges and interest during the period of default, and refused to refund it. I have not paid a penny on the account since it went into default. And as they have to refused to refund the additional charges and interest I have refered the matter to FOS.

 

LetterbackfromCiti12February2008part2upload.gif

 

LetterbackfromCiti12February200%20part3.gif

 

My question are;

 

- does the application form constitute a Consumer Credit Agreement?

- what are my options regarding the timings of their response and further possible action?

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who can help

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My question are;

 

- does the application form constitute a Consumer Credit Agreement?

- what are my options regarding the timings of their response and further possible action?

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who can help

 

This looks enforceable to me, MBciti. The prescribed and required terms are there, (credit limit, interest rates and repayments) so the agreement is properly executed.

 

The credit limit isn't on the agreement, but it does say how it will be determined and that you will be told. (Usually happens on your statement)

 

The only thing you could argue is that the terms & conditions don't form part of the agreement, as there are no "links" (usually sequential reference numbers) that show the pages are one document. This is dodgy, as they could show up with the original in Court and the Judge will have to enforce it if that happens and the terms are in the same document.

 

As for their "default", that default only continues while the agreement hasn't been provided - now they've given it to you, there is no "default", even though they've not stuck to the prescribed period.

 

This has no effect on charges/interest applied during that failure.

 

The 2006 Act has a requirement for provision of statements regularly, without which no interest/charges can be applied to the account until they are provided - this wasn't part of the 1974 Act, which regulates your agreement, however. You could use this to part defend enforcement of the entire balance, using the 2006 Act requirements as being "in the spirit of the law", as the 1974 Act does say they can't enforce while in default - but there is no direct legislation covering this, so you're relying on getting a sympathetic Judge.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent a cca request to debitas(acting for capital 1) on the 18th feb,recorded delivery and with a £1 postal order,I've now received a letter from them(dated 21 february) saying that because i have not called them or make a payment they are sending an 'agent' to my home in the next 7 days to"discuss my debt"!the cca request went to a PO box so i cant confirm it has been delivered,I do have a fax number for them and i wondered what course of action i should take,any ideas? i have to say i am a bit worried about some no-neck turning up on my door demading money:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent a cca request to debitas(acting for capital 1) on the 18th feb,recorded delivery and with a £1 postal order,I've now received a letter from them(dated 21 february) saying that because i have not called them or make a payment they are sending an 'agent' to my home in the next 7 days to"discuss my debt"!the cca request went to a PO box so i cant confirm it has been delivered,I do have a fax number for them and i wondered what course of action i should take,any ideas? i have to say i am a bit worried about some no-neck turning up on my door demading money:(

 

Send them this;

 

I refer to your letter dated **/**/****.

 

You will see from your files that this account is “in dispute”, as I wrote to you in terms of the dispute that I have in a letter dated **/**/****.

 

I am writing to inform you that this dispute still stands and has not been resolved.

 

As this account is in dispute and you were aware of this and are continuing to carry out collection activity, I now feel that you are in breach of your obligations under;

§
The Office of Fair Tradings Collection Guidelines;
o
“Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued”

§
The Banking Code;

o
“not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt.”

§
Your Consumer Credit License

 

As such, I must ask you to take notice that you must cease all collection activity with immediate effect. The alleged credit agreement you are relying on does not provide you with permission to continue to contact me regarding this account, either by post or by personal contact, be that by telephone or visits to my property. In fact, OFT rules and regulations clearly state that you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you. There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives, to visit me at my property and if you persist in sending "doorstep callers" to my home, you will be reported for harassment and be liable for damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be liable for conspiring in a tort of trespass by acting in defiance of my instructions and sending someone to visit me nevertheless. Should it be necessary, I will obtain an injunction from the Court.

 

I also deem any further collection activity, of any nature that involves contacting me in relation to this account, an act of personal harassment, for the reasons outlined in this letter. Please ensure that your system is updated to reflect this, as I will bring any further letters or phone calls to the attention of the Police, to whom I will make a formal statement regarding your conduct given I have already warned you your behaviour causes me to feel harassed.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by calling me, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded and used as evidence in any further formal complaint.

 

Yours faithfully

 

If they do turn up, tell them to wait a moment, close the door then call the Police.

 

If they write to you again, without providing an agreement, contact your local Police station, showing them a copy of your letter (you'll need to get proof of postage to confirm it was sent) along with their letter and make a statement complaining about harrassment.

 

Either way, the Police are duty bound to investigate.

 

I have a feeling you'll either receive a copy of the agreement or you won't hear from them again.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE POST 531

 

 

where's the heading at the top of the APPLICATION FORM about the CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 ETC ETC ....

 

IT SHOULD BE WHERE IT SAYS " NO OTHER GOLD CARD............."

 

IMHO that would make it incorrectly executed, but not irredeemably unenforceable, so if they took it to Court a Judge could easily enforce it :(

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I thought as mine was an application for credit form, not a consumer credit agreement, it would not meet the requirements of a consumer credit agreement... So I am wrong? and they could use this in court to enforce the debt?

 

To the best of my knowledge - If the document you & the creditor signed contains all the prescribed terms correctly then it can be enforced by a Court.

 

For more info http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/105315-my-agreement-enforceable-useful.html#post1005260

 

The box you signed says it is an agreement, and the small print prior to the signature box refers you to the terms & conditions. The Terms & Conditions seem to contain the prescribed terms

Now assuming that the 2 pages you've posted are part of the same document then, it does look as though it could be enforced with a Court Order.

 

 

For a better discussion, start your own thread & post a link here.

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cOULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME IF THIS LOAN AGREEMENT IS ENFORCEABLE PLEASE?????

 

http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh29/Soo43_photos/agreementsentbynorthernrock.jpg

Northern Rock - loan - £6000

Beneficial credit card - £12+

GM Card - £13+

will have to look up the others have about 21 debtors totalling about £175,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

cOULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME IF THIS LOAN AGREEMENT IS ENFORCEABLE PLEASE?????

 

http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh29/Soo43_photos/agreementsentbynorthernrock.jpg

 

I think unenforceable, as the rate of interest is missing. The APR is shown, but that includes fees, compound interest, etc, so isn't a specific rate of interest applied to the account. As rate of interest is a prescribed term, which is missing, the agreement is unenforceable, IMHO.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think unenforceable, as the rate of interest is missing. The APR is shown, but that includes fees, compound interest, etc, so isn't a specific rate of interest applied to the account. As rate of interest is a prescribed term, which is missing, the agreement is unenforceable, IMHO.

 

thanks car2403 - I didnt get any terms or conditions with it either - which section should i quote then when i argue my point with them as i have to go to court next week :-o

Northern Rock - loan - £6000

Beneficial credit card - £12+

GM Card - £13+

will have to look up the others have about 21 debtors totalling about £175,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

How trustworthy is your bank?

 

Phantom loans, 'recreating' paperwork, bringing dozens of lost documents back to life

 

How trustworthy is your bank? | Money | The Guardian

 

 

intresting read regarding cca

 

ad:)

 

You'll find the whole case outlined on CAG; (including several follow up stories)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/11427-walton-rbos.html (read from last 10 pages or so to skip the preliminary details)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

s.77/s.78 and the Consumer Credit (Agreement) Regulations (1983).

 

Have you a thread on this claim, Soo?

 

information is here not sure if it is my thread - get a little confused due to my illness - thanks for help

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131464-northern-rock-ccj-interim.html

Northern Rock - loan - £6000

Beneficial credit card - £12+

GM Card - £13+

will have to look up the others have about 21 debtors totalling about £175,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Can someone please clarify a point for me please ? The last post on this subject was dated early last year and I'm not sure if any legislation has been updated since then.

 

I have requested, from Vanquis , a copy of the original signed credit card application. Amongst other things I wanted to see if it has been signed by or on behalf on the bank, as I believe is required under the CCA 1974

 

In reply they have sent a copy of a sample application form ( i.e. no details filled in at all ) and they state

 

Quote

 

"In satisfaction of your request made under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a copy of the credit agreement, I enclose a copy of the application form which would have been completed by you together with a copy of the terms and conditions referred to in it "( the T & C are on a seperate document - my brackets)

 

"We regard this as meeting our obligation under section 78 of the Act 1974 to provide you with a true copy of the executed agreement. On their proper construction, that section and Regulation 3 of the Consumer Credit ( Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents ) Regulations 1983 ( 1983 S.I. No. 1553 ) do not require us to provide you with a copy of the executed agreement between us in the form of a photcopy of that document.

 

Inrespective of the above, you are still obligated to make payments to the above account "....... etc etc etc

 

Unquote

 

Is it true that they do not have to provide a copy of the executed agreement ? How should I respond if it's a ) true b ) untrue /

 

Thanks in anticipation of your comments

 

Valhalla

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it true that they do not have to provide a copy of the executed agreement ? How should I respond if it's a ) true b ) untrue

 

No, they have to provide a true copy of the agreement to demonstrate it complies with the legislation.

 

Send them this;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account Number: XXX

 

Re; your recent reply to my request under section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I note that you have replied to the above by sending a copy of an application form and your companies current Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

This breach of the agreement can be demonstrated as follows;

As you will know section 180(1) (b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form.” This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

 

Before leaving section 180 there are two other sections that should be remembered these are:

 

Section 2(2) (a) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not satisfied unless the copy supplied is in the prescribed form and conforms to the prescribed requirements;

 

And more importantly

 

Section 2(b) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not infringed by the omission of any material, or its inclusion in condensed form, if that is authorised by regulations.

 

You will see that this quite clearly states that whilst certain items may be left out of the copy document the rest of the document must be in the form and contain all items as prescribed by the regulations.

 

Turning to the regulations regarding what may be omitted from these copies these are contained with SI 1983/1557.

 

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations thereunder as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancelable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

 

It is quite clear what can be omitted from the copy document, this again asserts that all other details of the agreement should presented in form and content as required by the regulations.

 

The requirements of the Agreement regulations 1983/1553 are very explicit in describing the form and content of an agreement and this as I have demonstrated also applies to the copy of any such agreement with the above mentioned proviso.

 

Nowhere within these regulations does it state that part of the agreement can be presented on a separate document headed terms and conditions.

It does state that all terms and conditions should be within the agreement document and is explicit of the form in which it is presented.

 

I hope this explains why your reply was unacceptable I await a True copy of my agreement and would remind you again that whilst the request has not been complied with the default continues

 

Yours faithfully

 

Then start your own thread, keeping it updated;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...