Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, we are looking to get some opinions on weather or not to bother fighting this PCN. This comes from a very big retail park parking where there are restaurants, hotel, amongst other businesses. Apparently there is a max 3 hours limit which we were not aware of. This means taking kids to softplay and then having a meal on one of the restaurants will more than likely take you over the limit. Makes us wonder how they deal with people staying in the hotel as the ANPR seems to be in public street that leads to the different parking areas including the hotel.  1 Date of the infringement 26/05/2024 2 Date on the NTK  31/05/2024 3 Date received 07/06/2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  YES 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Entry and exit photos however, based on the photographs we are almost sure the photos are taken on public street. This is the location I believe photos are taken from.  https://maps.app.goo.gl/eii8zSmFFhVZDRpbA 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? UKPA. UK Parking Administration LTD 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] The Colonnades, Croydon, CR0 4RQ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. British Parking Association (BPA) Thanks in advance for any assistance.  UKPA PCN The Collonades-redacted.pdf
    • Thank you for posting their WS. If we start with the actual WS made by the director one would have doubts that they had even read PoFA let alone understood it. Point 10  we only have the word of the director that the contract has been extended. I should have had the corroboration of the Client. Point 12 The Judge HHJ Simkiss was not the usual Judge on motoring cases and his decisions on the necessity of contracts did not align with PoFA. In Schedule 4 [1[ it is quite clearly spelt out- “relevant contract” means a contract (including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land) between the driver and a person who is—(a)the owner or occupier of the land; or (b authorised, under or  by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land; And the laughable piece of paper from the land owners cannot be described as a contract. I respectfully ask that the case be dismissed as there is no contract. WE do not even know what the parking regulations are which is really basic. It is respectfully asked that without a valid contract the case cannot continue. One would imagine that were there a valid contract it would have been produced.  So the contract that Bank has with the motorist must come from the landowner. Bank on their own cannot impose their own contract. How could a director of a parking company sign a Statement of Truth which included Point 11. Point 14. There is no offer of a contract at the entrance to the car park. Doubtful if it is even an offer to treat. The entrance sign sign does not comply with the IPC Code of Conduct nor is there any indication that ANPR cameras are in force. A major fault and breach of GDPR. Despite the lack of being offered a contract at the entrance [and how anyone could see what was offered by way of a contract in the car park is impossible owing to none of the signs in the WS being at all legible] payment was made for the car to park. A young person in the car made the payment. But before they did that, they helped an elderly lady to make her payment as she was having difficulty. After arranging payment for the lady the young lad made his payment right behind. Unfortunately he entered the old lady's number again rather than paying .for the car he was in. This can be confirmed by looking at the Allow List print out on page 25. The defendant's car arrived at 12.49 and at 12.51 and 12.52  there are two payments for the same vrm. This was also remarked on by the IPC adjudicator when the PCN was appealed.  So it is quite disgraceful that Bank have continued to pursue the Defendant knowing that it was a question of  entering the wrong vrm.  Point 21 The Defendant is not obliged to name the driver, they are only invited to do so under S9[2][e]. Also it is unreasonable to assume that the keeper is the driver. The Courts do not do that for good reason. The keeper in this case does not have a driving licence. Point 22. The Defendant DID make a further appeal which though it was also turned down their reply was very telling and should have led to the charge being dropped were the company not greedy and willing to pursue the Defendant regardless of the evidence they had in their own hands. Point 23 [111] it's a bit rich asking the Defendant to act justly and at proportionate cost while acting completely unjustly themselves and then adding an unlawful 70% on to the invoice. This  is despite PoFA S4[5] (5)The maximum sum which may be recovered from the keeper by virtue of the right conferred by this paragraph is the amount specified in the notice to keeper under paragraph 9[2][d].  Point 23 [1v] the Director can deny all he wants but the PCN does not comply with PoFA. S9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN only quotes the ANPR arrival and departure times which obviously includes a fair amount of driving between the two cameras. Plus the driver and passengers are a mixture of disabled and aged persons who require more time than just a young fit single driver to exit the car and later re enter. So the ANPR times cannot be the same as the required parking period as stipulated in the ACT. Moreover in S9[2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; You will note that in the PCN the words in parentheses are not included but at the start of Section 9 the word "must" is included. As there are two faults in the PCN it follows that Bank cannot pursue the keeper . And as the driver does not have a driving licence their case must fail on that alone. And that is not even taking into consideration that the payment was made. Point 23 [v] your company is wrong a payment was made. very difficult to prove a cash payment two weeks later when the PCN arrives. However the evidence was in your print out for anyone to see had they actually done due diligence prior to writing to the DVLA. Indeed as the Defendant had paid there was no reasonable cause to have applied for the keeper details. Point 24 the Defendant did not breach the contract. The PCN claimed the Defendant failed to make a payment when they had made a payment.   I haven't finished yet but that is something to start with
    • You don't appeal to anyone. You haven't' received a demand from a statutory body like the council, the police or the courts. It's just a dodgy cowboy company trying it on. You simply don't pay.  In the vast majority of these cases the company deforest the Amazon with threats about how they are going to divert a drone from Ukraine and make it land on your home - but in the end they do nothing.
    • honestly you sound like you work the claimant yes affixed dont appeal to anyone no cant be “argued either way”  
    • Because of the tsunami of cases we are having for this scam site, over the weekend I had a look at MET cases we have here stretching back to June 2014.  Yes, ten years. MET have not once had the guts to put a case in front of a judge. In about 5% of cases they have issued court papers in the hope that the motorist will be terrified of going to court and will give in.  However, when the motorist defended, it was MET who bottled it.  Every time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

overflow v Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

Just checked mu bank and those b*****s have put £1343.00 in withiout my consent .:eek:

 

What do I do . Ive sent them a letter yesterday which they will have recieved today,(special delivery) giving them another 7 days to pay up in full or Ill carry on with the court claim.

 

How can they justify doing this .Im fuming.:evil:

 

They sent me a letter offering me this not mentioning Full & Final and informing me they would give me 7 days to get back in touch with them or they would consider it ok .

 

Now unless Im going loopy ( could be ), this means that they should not have done anything till 14th and as today is only the 10th that means I still have 4 days. They have cleared my overdraft with it ( obviously) but I dont know if they would use that now to take the money back.

 

HELP!!!!!!

 

Really dont know what to do now .

 

Regards

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 931
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi overflow, I dont know if this will help but its worth a try, I spoke to a man yesterday and today from customer relations who is really really helpful and does seem to understand where we are all coming from. His name is Gerry, and the number that you can get him on is 0151 224 7543. Youve nothing to lose so give him a call x

[COLOR=red][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP!!!!!!

 

Really dont know what to do now .

 

Regards

 

Easy!

 

Leave the money where it is! My £7.5k is in my 2 accounts.

 

If the letter you sent off was the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html then that's fine!

 

Be prepared for what happened to me today. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/81108-dusary-bank-scotland.html?highlight=dusary+v+hbos So that you are aware!

 

It's interesting that it's not the standard *FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT* letter. (That means you can't yet go to FOS - even if you were wanting to do that!)

 

What they have done is standard procedure for them when they are caving in!

 

You can still take them all the way ....... You WON'T lose!

 

You are going to be a !! WINNER !! very soon!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys.

 

Ive just been on te phone to Rachael Barker .

 

I asked could I speak to the person who sent me the letter offering me the money but he wasnt at his desk.

 

Gave her the details and asked why this money has been refunded into my bank and she said it was standard procedure.

 

Told her that they would have received my rejection letter today (posted yesterday special del) and she informed me that these letters go through the sorting office and would not appear on the system for a couple of days, (so much for having it special delivery then)

 

Then I explained that I had recieved their letter offering me refund and giving me seven days to EITHER accept or reject it and I said that it seemed pointless to me to stipulate the 7 days if they just refund wihout my consent anyway.

 

She appologised an said that she culdnt deal with this and somebody would write to me within the next couple of days.

I said that if the letter didnt go on the system for a couple of days and they have given me till the 14th the I hoped that this would be noted that they got it today 10th and that it would not jepordize the time limit .

She said it wouldnt ( I hope).

 

I thanked her and put phone down but still fumin.

 

No wonder they take money off us , its to fund their b****y pointless letters. :mad:

 

I wonder if they will take it back out as in the letter I sent ive given hem authorisation to do just that.

 

Dont want it in my bank too long in case it gets used up.

They have already cleared the o/draft with it so they can damn well take it out again and I know that by doing this I will again be in my o/draft once again (hey, whats new) .Ive got a feelin they wont do this though even though they havent told me that they will withdraw the o/d facility.

Do you think they will. Sneaky like that.

 

Now Ja-De if your on here I think Ill go give my ironing the thrashin of its life. LOL

 

Regards:)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a thought .

 

The letter from them came from Leeds yet the phone number Ive just rang was apparently in Pontefract ,( curtesy of Dursary)

This was the number to ring on the letter.:(

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Money

 

I dont want to do that cause wouldnt that be seen as accepting it then and Ive already sent the rejection letter that they have got today telling them I dont want it .

 

OMG just had another thought.

 

OH my brain hurts.

 

The letter I sent didnt say that I authorise them to take it back cause at the time of writing it they hadnt put it in.

What if they say the time is up cause they havent had authorisation to take it back:eek:

 

Gotta stop thinkin drivin me nuts.

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi overflow, sorry I've not been here when you were havin a crisis. That Rachel Barker Is the person I spoke to yesterday, she's not much help at all. I hope you've thrashed that ironing of yours, & feel better. Hopefully I'll be able to catch you for a chat tomorrow afternoon or sooner.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi overflow, just checking in to see if you are online, hope you're alright.

Got a letter from court this morning telling me that haliprats acknowledged the claim on 10 July 2007, & that they intend to defend all of the claim, so SSL told me that they now have a further 14 days, she also says that I should keep checking my account, 'cos it could be any day now when I get all thats owed to me. Sanand has also got a letter this morning, with the same dates as me. I really hope you've heard something either today or very soon. Talk later, ja-de xxx

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys ,

 

Thanks for the concern Money and Ja-De. Im fine thanks, been a bit busy thats all but you know me cant keep off this site for long.:p

 

Glad to hear youve had a response Ja-De.

 

As you know I had one back from the Court to say the Haliprars had filed an Acknowledgment of Service on 29th June , but now Im confused cause it says on mine that the Defendant has 28 days from the date of Service to file Defence .

 

I take it this means that their time is up on 26th July is this right?

 

Ive been checking my account again todau to seeif they have taken it back but its still there.:mad:

 

What do I do if they dont take it out but do decide to go all the way, that would mean all they would be defending is the interest going by them, but, my spreadsheet just for the 8% amounts to a different amount than theirs so could I bring this up in Court?

 

Just hope Iget a letter from them tomorrow saying they recieved my Rejection letter and telling me they will eiher take it out or settle.

 

The Latter would be nice.

 

Regards :)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi overflow, glad to hear that you're OK. SSL has told me this morning that it's another 14 days on top of the 14 from Deemed Served, so by my reckoning they have until 23 July for your claim, & they have until 26 July for mine. (So I'm only 3 days behind you still). Catch you tomorrow, I hope ja-de xxx

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Ja-DE

 

Dont know what Im thinking, of course it is . I dont think I counted the weekeds. DOH!

 

Ive just been lookin at a thread on contractual interest ( at what cost). I poted a question on there cause they all seem to know what their on about.

 

Asked how I should go on about the bank putting refund in my account.

If they hought that I should hold out you know.

 

Was advised that if bank had put charges +8% + Court Fee into my acount that I should accept it. I was a Winner, trouble is I dont feel like a winner. I wish I had closed the account now so they couldnt have put it in then.

 

Im peeved cause I got the charge to nearly £1450.00 with 8% without th £120.00 Court fee.

 

They have put £1343.10 in bank and thats includin the Court Fee, so thats nearly £200 short of what I might have got if it went to Court.

Thats a lot when your not workin so Im right p****d off.:mad:

 

I was told I should get a letter off them the other day when I rang so might wait for that but Im not holdin my breath. I cant believe they have done this in such an underhanded way,( then again, it is the Haliprats Im talkin about).

 

Well Ill just wait and see what happens I suppose.

 

Glad you got yours back , not too long to wait now for you and sanand

too. Isnt hers the same deadline as yours?

Lets hope you get it soon and with no messing you about eh.

 

Regards :)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiAll

 

Well so much for the Haliprats saying Ill get a letter in a couple of days re my Rejection Letter to them. Not a single peep.:mad:

 

Ive put a couple of posts on "Contractual Interest -Precedent --LOST" thread and had a lot of advice from people there.

 

Looks like Ive not a hope in hells chance now of getting the right amount back ( I reckon they are getting away with about £300) now its in my account. Dirty Rotten Sneaks.

 

That amount is a lot especially when your not working (still).

 

Like i said on there I'll put it down to experience and know better next time wont I .:(

 

 

 

ABBEY HERE I COME ALL GUNS BLAZIN :D

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi overflow, never mind about that, 'cos there's so much info to take in, there's bound to be something we either don't know or even forget!!

Yes, we have the same date, mind you they cut it fine with mine, as the 14 days are up today, but I think they went over 14 with sanands, (but if I'm wrong, I'm sure she'll correct me) so now we add another 14, which will bring it to 26 July.

I'm really happy that you got your money (You have WON, because you have beaten the bank), & it's better in your pocket than theirs, lol. But I'm sorry about haliprats underhand manoeuvre, by putting it in your account without consent, & it being short of about £300.

Make sure you give the ShAbby a good run to get your money back from them. ja-de

 

PS Glad you're not leaving us yet. hehehe

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi both, yes they went over with mine and when I complained to the court they said they had given them a days grace, which I was fuming about cos if Halifax had been claiming from me I bet I wouldnt have got the extra day, so now my date is 23rd July, but the way other people are going im not holding my breath, they really do seem to be taking us all to the wire now, ive decided that they are b*****ds, and I feel MUCH better for that little rant! lol :D

[COLOR=red][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you sanand, we all need to let a bit of steam off now & again, especially where the banks are concerned, so I say23_32_7.gif, I hope we all get our money sooner rather than later.

  • Haha 1

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ja-De & Sanand

 

Im not plannin ongoing just yet Ive got loads of fight in me yet Dont worry,

 

In fact Im just thinking about going for the Co-Op Bank . The account with them has been closed since my Husband passed in 1997 but seeing as the Statute of Limitations has more or less gone for a burton Im thinking "What the hell , why not"

 

Ill be filing against the Shabby soon as well so your gonna get sick of me:rolleyes: .

 

Ive just been reading or attemptng to read a govt doc (mst of whic went over my head) LOL. but it was about the excessively high profits the banks are making and how they are on track to make even more off the ordinary Joe Public.:shock:

 

Im still waiting though you never know I might get a letter off Haliprats telling me

"Yes of course we'll take the money out of your account and let you carry on with the Court thingy. No problem. How much would you like to claim back off us then. 1, 2, 3 thou perhaps. Would youl like that on a silver platter Mrs Overflow. Or perhaps delivered to your door by one of our Directors.

Howard? Yes Im sure we could get him to oblige"

 

NOT going to happen though is it. (but id love to see the neighbours faces if it did) :D

 

Hope you both hear something soon anyway Im sure you will.

 

Then youll both have something to celibrate .Are you planning to get anyone else or are you going to drift off this site, I hope NOT.

 

I think ths comp is havin a laugh now as keeps missin out letters ,Have to keep checkin txt to make sure it makes sense not gobble-de-gook.

 

Thanks for the replies guys Ill catch up on you later

 

 

regards :)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi overflow, when cash hits my account im gonna chase Barclays for hubby and im also gonna chase Halifax for charges ive had since this claim went in (only 2 but its the principle) so I would imagine ill be around for a while.

[COLOR=red][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi overflow, glad you feel a bit better now. I'm not planning on anyone else, as I only had haliprats dealing with my funds (or should I say lack of funds) since I split up with my ex-husband 14 years ago,but I'm not planning on leaving this site in a hurry either, you never know, but I just might be able to help others get their money back, 'cos my daughter & son in law have been through the wringer with their bank. So, I 'spose it'll be a case of watch this space. hehehe.

Catch you later.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Ive not heard anything from Haliprats regarding the Rejection Letter I sent them, but, since they decided to put money in my account on the same day they got the letter I didnt think they would acknowledge it.

 

So I guess I'm a "WINNER" then hey guys.

 

Could I request that a mod changes my title please.

 

I knew that I was doomed not to get the CI from them after the Precedent was set on anyone using M & R argument.

 

Would have been nice but what the hell Im still £1,343 better off than I was last week. Even if they have taken half for my o/draft. At least thats not hangin over my head any more.

 

As I sent the letter of Rejection to them, WHAT do I do now.?

 

Do I write to them and tell them that Ive decided to take their offer,

seeing as they gave me no option really, and then do I notify the Court that the matter has now been settled?

 

Not sure , if someone could steer me in the right direction Id be very grateful.

 

Im plannin to go get the Abbey now and others if I can.

 

Cant just stay away from this site.

 

Just want to thank ALL the people who have helped me and gven me advice along the way. I could not have done it without you all.

Knowing you were all tere routin for me was such an enormous help.

Also a BIG THANK YOU to Mindzai for his fantastic spreadsheet. Youve made it so easy to understand ,even for a dumb clux like me. LOL.

 

I cringe when I see some of my earier posts on here, so many daft questions but Im learnin all the time with your help.

 

To All the Mods on here as well THANK YOU for all your hard work. It must seem like a thankless task sometimes yet you all seem to have the patience of a saint. Without you all there would be no site.

A much deserved donation will be winging its way to this site very soon.

 

Regards :)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

ABBEY HERE I COME ALL GUNS BLAZIN :D

 

They're MY next targets - too - WHEN I've finished with HBOS and all the claims!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overflow, did you recieve all your charges, interest and court fees?

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...