Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GOT A COURT DATE? Important, please read......


GaryH
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well done Vixen35, add you results to the settled, we need to show them:)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 447
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Gary

 

Here's a snippet of info regarding Lloyds for folks who have hearing dates coming up soon.

 

In light of the recent OFT proceedings against many of the major banks I was concerned that my hearing may be put on hold (my date is the 16th)... as I have heard that many banks are applying for a 'stay' on hearings.

 

So I decided to call up Lloyds litigation SC&M to discuss my claim.

 

It might be claimants who have pending court dates coming up soon giving SC&M a call too...

 

I just called them (about 15 mins ago) and said that I wanted to discuss my claim in light of the recent OFT proceedings as I have a hearing date on the 16th of August. They settled in full over the phone!! full charges, plus 8% plus court costs, plus a bit extra which I assume is for more recent charges.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/51041-hard-slog-lloyds-tsb-3.html

 

SC&M said I should get something in the post over the next day or two...

 

It's worth a go and might save many of you from having to print out the court bundles or attend court.

 

Here's the number: 01273 205381, have your claim number handy.

 

:-)

Moodle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just called my local court (hearing on 22nd August) where they said that the judge has been in discussion with judges from many other courts and will not be staying the case before hearings simply because of the Test Case. If the bank wants a stay they will have to put up a legal argument for it and should not automatically assume they will get it.

 

Hopeful :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's encouraging, dolly.

 

May I suggest you add that post to this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/107548-office-fair-trading-test-36.html

 

Els

 

Have done :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i need some help please. lloyds sent me a letter 2 weeks ago saying basicaly that they would give me most of what i wanted as long as i signed acceptence letter and cancelled the court case. well i signed the letter but did not cancel the court case.i have now got a court date for the 10/08/2007 .i still havent had a cheque from lloyds. what do i do now.allso its a premilary hearing the letter said it would only last 5 mins. do i have to send them a court bundle and if so what do i send thats just incase lloyds dont pay up thanks dippy:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary

 

Here's a snippet of info regarding Lloyds for folks who have hearing dates coming up soon.

 

In light of the recent OFT proceedings against many of the major banks I was concerned that my hearing may be put on hold (my date is the 16th)... as I have heard that many banks are applying for a 'stay' on hearings.

 

So I decided to call up Lloyds litigation SC&M to discuss my claim.

 

It might be claimants who have pending court dates coming up soon giving SC&M a call too...

 

I just called them (about 15 mins ago) and said that I wanted to discuss my claim in light of the recent OFT proceedings as I have a hearing date on the 16th of August. They settled in full over the phone!! full charges, plus 8% plus court costs, plus a bit extra which I assume is for more recent charges.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/51041-hard-slog-lloyds-tsb-3.html

 

SC&M said I should get something in the post over the next day or two...

 

It's worth a go and might save many of you from having to print out the court bundles or attend court.

 

Here's the number: 01273 205381, have your claim number handy.

 

:-)

 

 

I just got off the phone with SC&M and was informed that all payments on outstanding claims have been suspended. She did,nt even want to discuss my case as there was no point at this moment in time. I think you were lucky Maxine. My case is in Oct, so maybe nearer the time, if not stayed, they may contact me. Suits me as i have a daily rate of interest being added.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wonder if Maxines was already marked for settlement and that is why she got her money yesterday - if a letter had already been done and was on the way?

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question about the court bundle and the statement of evidence/ witness statement

In the SoE in the Murray v lesuireplay it has the date as 2005

 

16. The Claimant will further rely on numerous recorded authorities dating throughout the 20th century up to the most recent case of Murray v Leisureplay [2005] EWCA Civ 963, all of which have upheld and reinforced the principles set down by Lord Dunedin defining contractual penalty clauses and the unenforceability thereof.

 

But in the court bundle it says 2004 like this

 

In the case of Murray v. Leisureplay (2004), Mr Murray was sacked by Leisureplay and he claimed three years' salary as per his contract of employment. The courts decided that this clause was a penalty clause and he was not entitled to this level of damages. Even though the decision was reverted on appeal, the appeal itself drew on and further reinforced the principles of penalty charges.

 

Is this a mistake or should it be like this.

Thanks.

Lloyds settled in full

£4010.02:D

 

Halifax CC settled

£417.00 :D

 

Lloyds PPI

£3672.15 Refunded off loan :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've answered this on the AQ thread already. 2005.

 

Please don't ask the same questions on different threads all over the site. Answering questions which may have been answered multiple times already is a waste of peoples time. Stick to your own thread preferably, then look elsewhere if you don't get an answer.

 

Thanks.:)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary,

 

Sorry about asking in two different threads, I was just trying to get my bundle finished off last night and I spotted the error. I really want to get it in this week as I phoned my court yesterday and they are carrying on as normal and stays must be applied for and dealt with on a case by case situation.

 

I will consider myself told :)

 

Thanks for the help btw

Lloyds settled in full

£4010.02:D

 

Halifax CC settled

£417.00 :D

 

Lloyds PPI

£3672.15 Refunded off loan :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.:)

 

Excellent news about no stays. Which court is it?

 

Also, if you have a court date v Lloyds, can you post on the "Lloyds Court Dates" thread please? Thanks.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted my court dates on the Lloyds Court dates thread already, I have one for 10th September which is for the largest amount, ££3,157.37 inc. MCOL fee and interest. I was asked to send my statement of evidence, etc, by 18th July which I did. Lloyds were asked to serve a response to my schedule by 8th August which they have not, as yet, done. I rang SC&M and they said that all claims had been suspended. I told them that no stay had been applied for in my case at the county court. They then said that in that case it would go to court.

Could someone please tell me what I should do if they do not reply as directed with their response to my schedule. Do I ask for a request for judgement and is there a letter somewhere on the forum?

Grateful for any help and I have posted this on my thread too.

Thanks - keeping my fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this site but have been watching for months. In fact quite new to forums. So hello all. Anyway someone please help! My husband has a court date in September - don't have exact details with me at present but will get back with the exact date. I have been sorting it out since we started the claim, letters to and from Lloyds. Needless to say we are some of the unlucky ones and have to go to court. I need to have a court bundle in by 10 August and am really concerned and unsure that i may not be doing it correctly. So far i will include in the bundle:

Corresspondence to and from Lloyds

The statements that Lloyds sent me when requested showing charges

The OFT report (front page as Gary mentions)

The Orton letter

The Administration letters

The Analysis of unfair terms in schedule 2

BBC The money programme bank commission

 

Is this enough and correct?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this site but have been watching for months. In fact quite new to forums. So hello all. Anyway someone please help! My husband has a court date in September - don't have exact details with me at present but will get back with the exact date. I have been sorting it out since we started the claim, letters to and from Lloyds. Needless to say we are some of the unlucky ones and have to go to court. I need to have a court bundle in by 10 August and am really concerned and unsure that i may not be doing it correctly. So far i will include in the bundle:

Corresspondence to and from Lloyds

The statements that Lloyds sent me when requested showing charges

The OFT report (front page as Gary mentions)

The Orton letter

The Administration letters

The Analysis of unfair terms in schedule 2

BBC The money programme bank commission

 

Is this enough and correct?

Many thanks

 

Hi

If you post your Court date in the thread below, GaryH will contact you with what you need to put in your Bundle:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/103945-lloyds-court-dates.html

 

Good luck!

Barty:-)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have my court date, recieved your email regarding bundle. Rang SC&M as they had not sent their bundle to me as required by the court, they actually said to me they weren't going to send it to me though the court guideline stated we had to serve on the court and each other 14 days before the court date its now the 6th August. I had my bundle to them and to the court can I ask the court to award judgement by default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have found terms and conditions that states: If you do use your card to create an overdraft we have not agreed to or to exceed an agreed overdraft limit, you will have broken the terms of the Account and you must repay the unagreed amount immediately.

 

I have included this in my bundle as their defense says that my husband has not breached the contract.

 

Is this any good do you think? If so I can put it on the site. Wasn't sure where to put this thread, sorry if it is in the wrong place.

 

It doesn't have a date on it but my husband only had the account from 2002 till 2005.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i need some help please. lloyds sent me a letter 2 weeks ago saying basicaly that they would give me most of what i wanted as long as i signed acceptence letter and cancelled the court case. well i signed the letter but did not cancel the court case.i have now got a court date for the 10/08/2007 .i still havent had a cheque from lloyds. what do i do now.allso its a premilary hearing the letter said it would only last 5 mins. do i have to send them a court bundle and if so what do i send thats just incase lloyds dont pay up thanks dippy:)

hi just thoufht i would lrt you know had my cheque sat £1,016 just £100 short of what i was claiming this included court costs dippy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 14 days away from the court date and have just spoke to SC&M regarding the fact I haven't received their bundle. They say they have a backlog and will have it to me within a week, if not I should call again. Anybody got suggestions of what I could do next?

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 14 days away from the court date and have just spoke to SC&M regarding the fact I haven't received their bundle. They say they have a backlog and will have it to me within a week, if not I should call again. Anybody got suggestions of what I could do next?

 

Malc

 

Hi

Have a look at this link:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/58011-sc-m-court-bundle.html

 

Good luck!

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Lloyds TSB settled and put the money in my account the court case went ahead because they left notifying me until the last minute and when I rang the courts to check that they had received my letter telling them of the settlement they hadn't.

A number of items of information came out of this.

1/ There was a representative there from SCand M (not for my case which they presumed was not going ahead but for others). he told me that Lloyds were not going to make any more payments until after the test case.

2/ SC and M were turning up at court to request stays on all cases. By the smile on face as he came out from seeing the judge I guess he was successful on the day.

3/ If they were not granted a stay and the decision went against Lloyds they intended to appeal after the test case.

4/ I asked the judge to consider awarding costs for my time etc as Lloyds had never submitted a bundle and their letter of settlement was dated 23rd July - the date by which their papers should have been submitted therefore they clearly had no intention of defending

5/ The judge was not convinced that Lloyds had acted unreasonably. He mentioned the test case more than once and I suspect that he did not want make any controversial decision while that was pending.

6/ I felt that he was also taking into account the fact that LLoyds had settled. He did check that their payment had included court fees which I felt he would have awarded if necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...