Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Re: Cca Request To Connaught Collections


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Interesting thread, I am in the same boat.

 

joneshousehold mentioned earlier "T&C's are not good enough and the OFT or DTI have confirmed this so we can look for it if they persist on that line".

 

Do you have the actual text or link? I would like to have a read

 

Thanks, Monty

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Its an application form. It does seem to include the prescribed terms. Have they supplied the terms & conditions mentioned or a statement of account?

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

No signed statement of account , no creditor signature , no cancellation rights don't know if i'm supposed to have these and i thought terms and conditions were already on this application are they not right , sorry i'm a bit lost with this any and all advice gratefully received , lisa !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copied from the CCA 1974.

 

What the agreement must contain

 

1 A heading in one of the following forms of words shown prominently on the first

page:

 

Hire-Purchase Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

or

Conditional Sale Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

or, in any other case,

 

Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Where the document embodies an agreement, of which at least one part is a credit

agreement not regulated by the Act, the word ‘partly’ must be inserted before

‘regulated’ in the heading – unless the regulated and unregulated parts of the

agreement can be clearly seen to be separate.

 

2 The name and a postal address of both trader and customer.

 

3 A description (in enough detail to identify it) of any security to be provided by the

customer and a description of its subject matter. The description must be in the

main agreement but the full terms can be in a separate document referred to in

the main agreement.

 

4 Details of any default charges which the customer or a relative of his is required to

pay if he breaches the agreement.

 

5 Certain financial and related particulars (see below).

 

6 Statements of certain forms of protection and remedies provided for the customer

by the Act (see pages 12–14).

 

7 A signature box (see Appendix 2).

 

 

Point to note

In the case of regulated agreements (principal agreements) which contain the option of credit

protection insurance or other contracts relating to a guarantee of goods (subsidiary agreements)

the heading, statement of protection and remedies available to debtors under the Act, and

signature box applicable to the principal agreement may be used where these are different from

those which would be applicable to the subsidiary agreement.

 

Financial and related particulars

 

The following information must be shown together as a whole and not interspersed with

any other information, apart from cross-references to terms of the agreement and subtotals

of the total amounts.

 

 

1 In the case of agreements for fixed-sum credit where the money must be spent on

specified goods, land or services, a list or description of the items, together with

their cash price. Where there is more than one list or description of the items to be

bought with the credit, the cash price of each must be shown, together with the

total cash price. For instance: ‘mahogany dining room suite, six chairs and one

table, £1,500; colour TV £298; total cash price £1,798’. Where there is more than

one list or description, the cash prices and descriptions can be shown in a

schedule to the agreement, provided that the agreement itself refers to the

schedule and states the total cash price.

 

Points to note

The cash price is the price at which the seller would be prepared to sell to a buyer for cash.

It excludes any credit charges and is net of any discount offered to the customer.

‘Specified goods’ etc means goods agreed upon before the agreement is made. Thus these

are specified goods for a hire-purchase agreement but not, for example, for a trading check.

 

2 The amount and nature of any advance payment. This includes a deposit, any

amount allowed in part exchange, and any other payment the customer has to

make before being provided with credit or before entering into the agreement.

 

3 The amount of credit to be provided under a fixed-sum agreement (for example, a

cash loan) or particulars of the credit limit under a running-account agreement (for

example, a credit card).

The credit limit can be expressed as:

a a sum of money, or

b a statement that the trader will, under the agreement, periodically determine

the credit limit and notify the customer, or

c a sum of money together with a statement that the trader may, under the

agreement, periodically vary the credit limit and notify the customer, or

d if (a) (b) or © above are not appropriate either a statement indicating how the

credit limit will be determined and notified to the customer or a statement that

there is no credit limit.

Point to note

Under a fixed-sum agreement where the credit must be spent on specified goods, land or

services, the amount of credit will be the total cash price less any advance payments. If

there are no advance payments, nor any charges for credit under such an agreement, the

amount of credit (which will be the same as the total cash price) need not be shown.

 

4 The total charge for credit and the total amount payable by the customer in the case

of most fixed-sum agreements. The exceptions are given in the ‘points to note’

below. Charges payable by the customer that form part of the total charge for credit

are explained in the booklet Credit charges and APR (see page 35). The total

amount payable is the sum of the amount of credit provided under the agreement,

the total charge for credit and any advance payments. If either the total charge for

credit or the total amount payable cannot be precisely calculated, an estimate can

be shown – provided that this and any assumptions made in the estimate are stated.

 

Points to note

Point 4 does not apply to fixed-sum agreements where:

$ the credit must be spent on specified goods or services, and

$ the total amount payable is not more than the total cash price (that is, there are no

credit charges).

Nor does it apply to fixed-sum agreements under which the timing and/or amounts of

repayments of credit are not specified, or the total amount payable can vary according to

any formula specified in the agreement (including the level of any index, for example the

house price index), or the amount or rate of any credit charge can vary (whether in

accordance with the level of an index, for example, bank base rate or otherwise). In these

cases, the details of interest and other charges to be shown are the same as those required

for running-account agreements.

 

I hope this helps.

 

Regards

BigAndy

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I can't see 3 and 4 anywhere on it, the default charges or security bits , but does what you have said above combined with no signature from them and heading mean it is unenforceable then ? and do any of the rest of that mean anything to me , sorry to be so thick just trying really hard to get my head round all the info needed !

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion Yes. It does not contain the correct heading etc. But I stand to be corrected by those with more knowledge on here :D

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just had advice from someone who said it does not have a heading anywhere on it stating consumer credit act 1974 just application form , also no penalty terms or default charges and no cancellation rights ever received no signature and just one other thing the a/c no that 1st credit have is different to the one that citi have is this relevant ? p.s on the above i am only quoting anothers opinion in the hope that the more opinions i have the better informed i will be not trying to correct or offend anyone !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all , still not heard from their solicitors do you think I won't until they try to take me to court , and also any advice on the above much appreciated , still waiting for S.A.R from citi too so everything on hold at minute , but i'd like to thank everyone for all the help i have had so far this really is an amazing site , cheers lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

What did I put in a post in this thread :? that offended so that it has been unapproved????:? :? :? Which post has been removed????:?

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...