Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!!


lateralus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 902
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Russmuss,

 

I had an identical letter from my local court some weeks ago.

Have you sent down a full breakdown of charges from the spreadsheet you intially filled out??

 

I am guessing this is what they want.

If you are in any doubt, give your local court a call and ask them specifically - local court staff are overworked, but very helpful in my experience.

 

Querky

Initial Letter 23/12/06

LBA 14/01/07

MCOL 1/3/07

Acknowledged 3/3/07

Defended 27/03/07

Transferred 3/4/07

Stay Ordered 27th April

Stay Set Aside 14th May

COURT DATE 5th JUNE 2007

 

Waiting on offer just under £5K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Querkyone

Thanks for your reply. I have prepared a reply to the court with particulars of claim as are written on this website and I have enclosed the schedule of charges - I haven't broken down the charges - do you think I should ? What did you send back to your court ? I wondered if the standard particulars of claim were sufficient and yet dont really know how to make them more detailed - I mean what more can you say other than they have charged this money unlawfully and quote the relevant Acts ? I did ring the court and the bloke there was really nice but said he couldnt tell me what to say only that the judge wanted info about my claim, so . . . . . . . . . . . maybe just send that and wait and see !! Are they likely to throw the case out if my details arent detailed enough do you think !! ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you started with mse or bbc sites - their idea of a schedule of charges isn't descriptive enough - the schedule should be in the form of a list (or spreadsheet) oldest charge first working through to newest and every charge must have a date, a name (what it is called on the statement), the amount of the charge. added up, then add on the 8% interest then add on the court filing fee and allocation fee (if you paid one). then a grand total. it's that description of each charge - the name - that isn't pointed out on those other sites. this is what they want to see - so, get it to them as soon as possible - put the claim number on it and copy it to dg. is this more than what you sent in the past? that will be what they want.

i've just reread your post again and if it's the particulars of claim they are after - i'll pm you mine - they should look like that - if not - use mine - with you figures and get it to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a star - thanks for that, Ive used yours - with my details of course - sounds a thousand times better than mine. Spreadsheet lists the name of each charge and Ive added the court cost and interest. Thanks again for that - really grateful for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, just thought I would share this with you all as it is a D & G Solicitors acting for GM Card ( HSBC) I was recently offered settlement the week before my case and I signed in full and final settlement. The only thing they ( D&G) would not pay was my time for the preparation of my bundle of £50. In my case having followed the wonderfull Garyh's Q8 on the AQ, my Judge gave orders that the defendants had to file their evidence into court by a certain date otherwise they would strike out their defence. The day came and went and no bundle so Garyh again helped with a letter to the court requesting the strike out of the defence and request judgement, I also asked for costs. Now the case has been settled but today, guess what i received a Judgement from the court for the £50, the judge has awarded me this for my time in completing my part of the claim. I had actuall asked for 7 hours at £9.25 which is £64.75 and the Judge awarded £50. Do you think that D & G will cough up!

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably!! another letter detailing the amount for charges, costs and time for completion - why not? lol

 

i wish i'd though of that one (crys) lol... good luck

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I just want to check on the wording of the second "nudge" letter where the daily rate is mentioned.

 

Should it read like this :

 

"I am willing to accept the sum of £xxxx (total claim & AQ fee), plus 0.xxp per day from the date I filed the claim until the date it is resolved, as full and final settlement of this particular claim".

 

Is the date I filed the claim the date of issue?

 

Thanks for any help.

Mimi

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my notification of transfer to local court - Aq dispensed with...on the 17th April. I decided to send in the draft order and covering note from #1 on this thread - that was two weeks ago.....have heard nothing since.

I've phoned the court twice....the first time she said the papers were with the District Judge......today she said she wasn't sure if they were still with the District Judge but no directions had arrived back with her.

 

Anyone got any suggestions what I should do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

let the courts sit a bit and decide what they want to do - but as for dg - as ever - a nudge every 10 days until they make an offer - keeps some poor little secretary busy digging out the files, dusting them off and filing away another letter and breakdown. hopefully - they'll get tired of that and make an offer sooner rather than later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lateralus

 

While I haven't got this far in my quest for my charge yet.

 

What do you think about the idea of adding the cost of each recorded letter to the final total of the claim , or is that not allowed?

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think costs aren't allowed in small claims

although some judges have allowed some in some cases - that's a lot of somes..............

but at £1 for recorded delivery - it's only the first two letters - and if you are really stretched - you could just ask for proof of posting at the post office and that is free - so you've only got to spend the price of a couple of stamps and if you are really, really stretched (i'm not kidding here - i do know some people are really this stretched) you could deliver the first two letters to your branch and ask for a receipt to keep for your records. and that would be free! i am the queen of mean - you could go the the library - use their computer, their electricity - use the back side of junk mail for paper and probably do this without spending any money at all! might be a little harder to deliver letters to dg unless you are very, very nice to netty and you could e-mail them to her and she lives just around the corner and she might deliver them for you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was just a thorght, wanted to be nasty to someone, after talking to Virgin Media about the same thing for the sixth time this month, banks were obvious target.

 

Shall now cill with a few beers

 

Good Luck

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good or Bad

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that lateralus - i have so far resisted sending anything to abbey since filing my claim - i didn't want to prejudice my chances by making them think i was desperate - maybe it is a good thing to do now though and might just bring a quicker result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

desperate, schmesperate! you write them a nudge letter (they might not have seen them as most of our gang are with hsbc) it might just knock them out and make them send you an offer straight away. i'm advising a letter every 10 days on here.

the court result is not necessarily to be-all and end-all... they can apply for stays and orders and all sorts to lengthen it out - ultimately, it is the threat of looming court action which spurs them into making an offer.

good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know we're desperate for our money and we know they're desperate to avoid going to court.:rolleyes: Even if they don't pay up after 1 or 2 "nudge" letters, at least any attempts to try to resolve the matter (i.e. get them to pay up) would be seen favourably by the courts and that can be no bad thing.

 

Personally, when/if I send them the first letter, I'm really going to lay it on thick about my circumstances. It could give them an "excuse" to pay up, or they can choose to drag it on even further. Providing I'm ready for court (if it comes to that), they're the ones who'll have to back down in the end.icon7.gif

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks lateralus and MimiJane - I think I will send a nudge letter - will get it in the post first thing after the bank holiday.

 

As you say, can't do any harm and may just give 'em the kick in the pants they need!!

 

Cheers! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...