Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ICY -V- Capital One


ICY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4563 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just zoomed in on photoshop :cool:

 

I would say completely unenforceable, in court obviously. I would send a letter along those lines.

 

Without reading through the rest of the thread, if your claim is for charges and default removal and you've followed the process of claiming your charged back, it may be time to file in court. Capital one have and in your case probably will remove the default too.

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Claim has been filed in court, and stayed pending test case. At each stage i have told them my claim will involve removal of the default, they have said outright that they wont remove the default.

 

They have settled the financial side of the claim, the only thing remaining is the default removal.

 

Were do i go from here if the agreement is unenforcable, what would be the best way to tackle this with regards to the default.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you accepted their financial settlement as yet?

 

If not, do what i did, bombard them with letters/emails stating that the entire debt what unforceable anyway as they do not hold a proper agreement, merely an application form. For me, after 3 or so letters tey buckled and settled. My case was also subject to a stay

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in understanding that you are fighting the fact that Cap1 have registered you as gone away?

 

What was the claim issued asking for? And why was it stayed? Credit Card charges are exempt from the OFT test case, so I think the easiest thing to do is to enter an application stating that you want the stay lifted due to it having nothing to do with the OFT test case. That way they will then be forced to attend a hearing (if they don't settle before).

 

I have had a similar thing happen to one of my mum's claims (not the GAIN part) and this is what we are having to do.

 

They will always fight the removal part, I don't really know why but the easiest way to get it removed is to get it to a hearing - they will hopefully settle before having to attend, but if they don't they will have to explain it all to a judge and the CCA is completely explicit about Default Notices and contents of Credit Agreements, so I believe they won't have a leg to stand on.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

When /i submitted my claim is was for a money amount and a default removal, cap1 never issued me with a default notice which they say they have done, and have since registered false info about me, they have been sneaky about this though as they didnt use the GAIN section, they simply changed a field in the info section to read gone away, this despite correspondance between us all in my present address.

I asked for copies of agreement and true copy of alledged default they served on me, the result of this request is shown on the scans on the previous page, simply a template default letter and card application.

 

The claim ws stayed at Oldham CC on the judges orders in august.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

When /i submitted my claim is was for a money amount and a default removal, cap1 never issued me with a default notice which they say they have done, and have since registered false info about me, they have been sneaky about this though as they didnt use the GAIN section, they simply changed a field in the info section to read gone away, this despite correspondance between us all in my present address.

I asked for copies of agreement and true copy of alledged default they served on me, the result of this request is shown on the scans on the previous page, simply a template default letter and card application.

 

The claim ws stayed at Oldham CC on the judges orders in august.

 

Well mate, it shouldn't have been stayed - the easiest thing to do? Enter an application asking for a hearing to request the stay is lifted. I have had to do this for a couple of credit card claims - it's crazy considering CC claims should not be stayed.

 

Download the form from the HMCS website -if you need a hand let me know! :)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should be the form that you need:

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_0400.pdf

 

Let me know how you get on.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well what do you know, while getting ready to print the letter off this morning to let them know i am going to apply to have the stay lifted and go to court for default removal, the postie has just dropped a letter in from crap1

 

Dear Me

 

I have spoken with X County Court who confirmed that your clim is still stayed in accordance with the order dated X

 

We indicated in our letter to you of X 2007 that we believe that we have settled your claim in full. If you are in agreement with this, we would ask that you please contact the court in writing to discontinue your claim and send us a copy as there is no need for it to remain stayed.

 

If you are not in agreement that your claim has been settled, we would ask that you please notify us in writing which elements of your claim you believe to be still outstanding. We will then be able to discuss the matter further with you.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following is my letter of response, See you in court Cap1.

 

 

 

 

I consider the financial side of the claim is now settled following receipt of your cheque dated 5th September 2007.

 

However I am still continuing the claim through the County Court for removal of the Default. I wish to stress that I accepted your offer as partial payment only towards my claim. As my Particulars Of Claim state I am also claiming removal of incorrectly issued default.

 

Capital One entered a default with a default date of 19th January 2006 and default value of £438.00 It is my contention that due to your offer of a refund of charges applied to the account after the default date, that the value applied to this default is incorrect. Further to this Capitol One have also applied a gone away marker on 5th August 2007, this is an untrue marker, which is provable by the fact that I have been in communication with you since at least April 2007 (date of my Subject Access Request) signed for by yourselves, and to which you have responded to in writing, at my present address, where I have resided since May 2006.

 

Further to this I requested a copy of my Credit Agreement, and also a copy of any default notice sent to me before you filed the default with CRAs. I understand that the ‘agreement’ you sent me is in fact merely an application for a card, and I believe that the agreement will in fact be proved to be completely unenforceable when this matter comes before the court, with regards to the default notice, I asked you to provide a ‘true’ copy of the default notice you issued on me before you registered the default, you were not able to supply me with this information, a blank template default letter does not satisfy my request.

 

The only reason I knew you had registered a default against me was when I checked my credit file, at the time you issued the default I was living at my current address, however my ex partner was living at my previous address which is where you claim to have sent the default notice to, my ex was passing to me all mail received for me at that address on a weekly basis, there was at no point any default notice either sent to me at my current or previous address.

I asked for proof you had sent me a default notice, this you were unable to provide and further goes to show you have not registered the default lawfully.

 

Here follows entries you have made on my credit file

 

16/04/06

Company name: CAPITAL ONE

Account type: Credit Card / Store Card

Special Instruction Indicator: Partial Settlement

Special Instruction Start Date: 04/2006

Started: 28/07/2004

Default Balance: £438

Current Balance: Satisfied

Defaulted On: 19/01/2006

File updated for period to: 16/04/2006

 

 

29/05/07

 

Company name : CAPITAL ONE

Account type : Credit Card / Store Card

Started : 28/07/2004

Default Balance : £438

Current Balance : Satisfied

Defaulted On : 19/01/2006

File updated for period to : 29/05/2007

Status History: (brackets indicate most recent status)[ ]

 

05/08/07 (and current)

 

Company name: CAPITAL ONE

Account type: Credit Card / Store Card

Special Instruction Indicator: Gone Away

Special Instruction Start Date: 08/2007

Started: 28/07/2004

Default Balance: £438

Current Balance: Satisfied

Defaulted On: 19/01/2006

File updated for period to: 05/08/2007

Status History: (brackets indicate most recent status)[]

 

You have left negative information about me without having permission to share information about me with 3rd parties, the only permission you had to discuss information with 3rd parties ceased when you closed my account, furthermore the negative information you have recorded about me on the 5th August 2007 is in fact completely untrue, as will be proved when this matter comes before the court.

Not only is it a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, it is also my belief that you may have committed an offence under the Fraud Act 2006.

 

In summary I hereby request you remove the default entry made on my credit file, as this has not been lawfully entered, Capital One failed to serve a default notice on me, and have also failed to supply me with a copy of the original default notice despite my request.

On requesting a copy of my CCA you have sent me an application, which does not contain the required information.

 

Should you wish to settle my claim in full, then please reply confirming your intention to remove the default notice which is left on my credit reference file, and I will then inform the court that all parts of the claim are completely settled.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours Sincerely

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference, should you need it, the legislation to get them to remove incorrect inforation (ie the defaults) is section 14 of the DPA 1998. You can also ask for comensation under section 13 for losses due to not being able to obtain credit at advantageous rates of interest.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference, should you need it, the legislation to get them to remove incorrect inforation (ie the defaults) is section 14 of the Data Protection Act 1998. You can also ask for comensation under section 13 for losses due to not being able to obtain credit at advantageous rates of interest.

 

Interesting.....

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

The relevant sections (s14 goes on a bit about the court verifying destruction but I haven't bothered with that):

13 Compensation for failure to comply with certain requirements

 

(1) An individual who suffers damage by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of this Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that damage.

(2) An individual who suffers distress by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of this Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that distress if—

(a) the individual also suffers damage by reason of the contravention, or

(b) the contravention relates to the processing of personal data for the special purposes.

(3) In proceedings brought against a person by virtue of this section it is a defence to prove that he had taken such care as in all the circumstances was reasonably required to comply with the requirement concerned.

 

14 Rectification, blocking, erasure and destruction

 

(1) If a court is satisfied on the application of a data subject that personal data of which the applicant is the subject are inaccurate, the court may order the data controller to rectify, block, erase or destroy those data and any other personal data in respect of which he is the data controller and which contain an expression of opinion which appears to the court to be based on the inaccurate data.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found those parts and added them to the letter, never got chance to get to the post office yesterday due to being stuck in meetings all day, so will send it registered on monday.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found those parts and added them to the letter, never got chance to get to the post office yesterday due to being stuck in meetings all day, so will send it registered on monday.

 

Great. Good luck - keep us all updated!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, can you move these posts to my thread in order to nothijack ICY's thread?:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/102075-un1boy-n1-issued-breach-new-post.html

 

Yes, I do have a default amrker and have a hearing scheduled for a couple of months time.

 

 

No worries mate, i dont mind at all if it means you get an answer :wink:

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aw thanks ICY.....did you get the letter sent?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

yup its gone, BUT, i forgot it needed to go reg, i sent it standard mail, big mistake, i have no proof i sent it unless they respond to it.

Cant believe I did that, I always send EVERYTHING reg post, the worst thing is i sent 2 AQs off to court same time which went special delivery (had to be there by next day so needed guarenteed)

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yup its gone, BUT, i forgot it needed to go reg, i sent it standard mail, big mistake, i have no proof i sent it unless they respond to it.

Cant believe I did that, I always send EVERYTHING reg post, the worst thing is i sent 2 AQs off to court same time which went special delivery (had to be there by next day so needed guarenteed)

 

It'll be ok - just resend if you don't hear from them!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing i have just seen on my credit report is i had one other default, an account with a different company, which defaulted after moving a while ago and i forgot i had the account, as soon as i saw the default on my credit file i contacted them and paid up as quick as i could, the default was still showing on my credit file i paid up about 2 years ago, i was going to tackle these once i had sorted cap1 to ask them if the would consider removing the default, but looking at my credit file and it isnt there, they seem to have taken it upon themselves to remove it, i wonder if i am getting a name for myself lol

 

If only cap1 would be as polite lol, guess its gonna have to be the hard way.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've scared em Icy ...

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've scared em Icy ...

 

indeed

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...