Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Red after the wrong person


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello forum, I’ve just joined.

 

Lowell/Red are chasing me for a debt that is not mine.

 

They have bought a debt from Capital One for a credit card that defaulted 4 or 5 years ago and sent me a letter asking for payment. I rang them to say I had no knowledge of the debt, and they asked me if I had ever lived at [First line of address X]. I said no, I have lived at my current address for over ten years, and the conversation ended about then.

 

I googled [First line of address X] and it turns out that there is only one road of that name in the UK. So I did a people search at 192.com using [First line of address X] and my name, and got an entry out showing that someone with my name did live at [address X] some time ago.

 

The conclusion is that Lowell have done a faulty trace and think the person who lived at [address X] is me.

 

I have sent them 2 letters so far that state I have no connection with the debt, I have never lived at [address X], and I was living at my current address at the time that the person that was living at [address X] defaulted on the card.

 

However, there is a complication. Around the same time as the credit card in dispute defaulted, I did have a different credit card with Capital One of my own. This card was opened by me at my current address and closed by me several years later. This means that there will be a valid (i.e. signed by me) credit agreement with Capital One in existence. My worry is they will have requested a CCA from Capital One and will have got hold of my real CCA for my card, and not the one that was signed by the person at [address X] and will try to use this as proof that I owe the money.

 

I have a copy of my credit report that obviously has no record of the card in question. It does show my own Capital One credit card with all zeros showing good payment history for the lifetime of the card and a settled balance of zero when I closed the card.

 

It would appear that their case against me is entirely dependant on their faulty trace. I can prove that I have never lived at [address X] and as mentioned my credit report is clean and shows no record of the card in dispute.

 

Despite having given them my address history and denying any connection with the debt, I have just received a letter from Red giving me 7 days to pay before “we will have to look at other ways to recover the debt possibly by commencing legal action against you which may entail a petition for your bankruptcy being sent to Court”

 

I am worried because they have ignored the fact that I have never lived at [address X] and continue to pursue me, so they must think they have a case against me. How can they? After reading other posts, I would have delayed things by asking for the CCA, but as I’ve said above, this might work against me if things have got muddled up.

 

I would appreciate advice on what to do next. If they take me to court, I have nothing to take there apart from my credit report and proof that I have lived at my current address for a long time! What else will I need? Will they even tell me they have gone to court? Is it likely that they will take it that far even though they must know they have the wrong person?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Wow, I can see the confusion with this one.

 

Do you have any of your old council tax bills knocking about? Drivers License, Utility Bills etc. Say for example around the time this Credit Card account was opened. That could be one way of showing where you were living at the time.

 

If it did go to Court, I would take any documentation you may have showing your address details at the time of the Credit Card being taken out. Also if you still have it, correspondance regarding your old Capital One Card.

 

I would also possibly contact Capital One to explain what has happened, perhaps they could shed some light on the situation. It must be very stressful but don't worry.

 

Thanks

Completed:

Woolwich: Received £30

Intelligent Finance: Received £1100 after two years and approximately 20 letters, 6 pieces of hair and an eyeball.

Barclaycard: Received £90

HFC: Received £170

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt collector must be able to prove that they have found the right person. It is not your responsibility to do that.

 

I would write a letter to these scumbags statin gthat unless they clear evidence that the person they are chasing is you then they are to desist from contacting you.

 

If they are so certain they have found the right person invite them to take legal action against you. They would have to provide real proof then to a judge and you will have an opportunity to have your say before an impartial person.

 

Make it clear to them that any attempt by them to blacken your name via credit reference agencies will result in a complaint being made to the Information Commissioner and a claim made against them or damages for defamation.

 

Insist on a response and if none is forthcoming remind them, especially if you receive more demands for money in the meantime.

 

You could copy Crap1 into the loop. They may not have sold the debt and as a result are liable for the actions of their collectors. They also have deeper pockets than the collectors in the event of a court action.

 

Remember to send any letters by recorded delivery or these scumbags will deny ever receiving them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. Another letter will go off tomorrow recorded delivery, basically saying what I've said before - debt is not mine, don't acknowledge it, I won't be paying you any money, request they look at the trace again and I've added some of the other suggested comments.

 

As far as Capital One go, I've been sending them copies of the letters that I've sent to Lowell. They basically said sorry but nothing to do with them since they sold the debt.

 

I really can't see how Lowell can make the connection between the debtor and me - the 2002 electoral list at 192.com even has separate entries for me at my address and the debtor and all of his family at [address X]. I've got loads of paperwork including council tax etc going back over the last 10 years as proof that I've been living where I say.

 

Just have to wait and see if they want to push it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...