kings hill/hodsons[cabot] claimform - mogan Stanley card **DISCONTINUED**

[Seahorse]

Odds-on favourite.

[elizabeth1]

Hey well done - this is where they'll present one typed version and accidently forget the other real version?

 

Can't wait to see what they come up with!!

[Rhia]

Just like to add my well done message. From looking pretty worrying you have turned this around brilliantly and all by using the CCA against these shysters. Keep up the pressure. You may have felt even like giving up but this shows why you shouldn't. Bring Cabot and their dodgy dealings to book.

CFC RULES!!!

[debt_mountain]

I predict they will not produce anything in the 14 days.

[ODC]

Just one thing niggles me. Unless I have been reading this wrongly. What happened to having to produce an original signed copy of an executed CCA in Court to enforce

[Seahorse]

The same thing applies. It is the law after all. And sometimes the judges need to be pointed in the right direction, since they don't all have an encyclopedic knowledge of the law.

[djdave]

According to the OFT, when they replied to me, the response to a CCA request doesn't necessarily have to be a true copy but when it comes to enforcing it in court Cabot would indeed need to produce a genuine copy complete with prescribed terms and signatures.

 

I'd suggest that if they started court action without such a document then it could be considered vexatious litigation. In my opinion.

[ODC]

This is the bit I cannot understand. mrrj is in Court with Crapbot and neither DJ has asked to see the original signed agreement

[Seahorse]

Then it's a question that should be asked...

 

M'lud (how do you address a judge? I think it's just Sir, isn't it?), I would like to ask the claimant to show the court the true, signed agreement, as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. WHat, you didn't know about that bit? Here, let me just show you. If you turn your copy of the Act to section.... etc, etc.

[elizabeth1]

According to the OFT, when they replied to me, the response to a CCA request doesn't necessarily have to be a true copy but when it comes to enforcing it in court Cabot would indeed need to produce a genuine copy complete with prescribed terms and signatures.

 

I'd suggest that if they started court action without such a document then it could be considered vexatious litigation. In my opinion.

 

 

Cabot WILL start litigation without having any papers in place - they use this Hodsons firm in Rugby to do it. More recently they started filing claims MCOL to avoid a solicitor having to sign the claim form (stops us identify who is filing claim and complaining to Law Society about the individual)

 

Once you challenge them about papers they'll back off and allow case to be struck out of court to avoid following any Judges orders to provide the CCA and papers etc...

 

Cabots aren't fussy who they pick on at all - small issues like no papers won't bother them = for every one of us CAGGER'S who challenge them for the correct papers - there are dozens of persons out there who have no idea to challenge these bloodsucking T*ssers.

 

You see it's a bit of a game to them at Cabots - they basically wing it to see who'll just pay up. As we see from their profits plenty do because they don't know of CAG and their rights.

 

The only way to stop these people is to go back after them in court - challenge them.

[ODC]

Surely if every CAGGER who had a Crapbot case struck out like this complained to the FOS and the OFT Kens licence would look extremely dodgy

[mrrj]

FOS and OFT will soon be getting some letters from me . In my case cabot were suppose to produce the notice of assignment by 10/08 but the DJ accepted the poor DOA as notice of assignment , i pointed out that in the DOA cabot supplied it says they must supply me a notice within 30 days but the DJ wasnt bothered.

[mrrj]

Hows this for an order

"The best copy of the loan agreement together with a typed copy thereof together with a sworn affidavit of accuracy shall be filed and served" In default thereof the claim may be struck out.

[debt_mountain]

I think the Judge wants them back in front of him so he can "play" with them. He want to see the best they can offer and have them swear to its authenticitiy and then he will rip it and hopefully them to bits.

 

great work.

[ODC]

Hows this for an order

"The best copy of the loan agreement together with a typed copy thereof together with a sworn affidavit of accuracy shall be filed and served" In default thereof the claim may be struck out.

When did you get this??

[mrrj]

Today after tuesdays court appearance

[ODC]

Thats an excellent result then for you as Im sure Kens people will have to withdraw or tell porkies

[mrrj]

I bet on them playing for more time ?

[ODC]

I think the wording of the order puts paid to them winging it any longer

[elizabeth1]

I think the Judge wants them back in front of him so he can "play" with them. He want to see the best they can offer and have them swear to its authenticitiy and then he will rip it and hopefully them to bits.

 

great work.

 

 

Me thinks a few Judges have this kind of "play" in mind :D

[ODC]

Me thinks a few Judges have this kind of "play" in mind :D

Maybe they are CAGGERS:o

[elizabeth1]

Maybe they are CAGGERS:o

 

 

Now that could just be so - they'll never know who we made good friends with will they?? and that should worry them!!

 

They'll never know who is reading here

[mrrj]

By the way DM it was a woman judge

[mrrj]

Well 14 days is up and no letters from cabot but i just noticed on the order that the judge has given them till 4 pm on the 3rd of october(15 days). I got all hyped up for nothing today.

[elizabeth1]

Well 14 days is up and no letters from cabot but i just noticed on the order that the judge has given them till 4 pm on the 3rd of october(15 days). I got all hyped up for nothing today.

 

TICK TOCK - LOL

 

I wonder if they huddled around the couldron?