Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chip and Pin victim :(


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5871 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

This is my first post here.

I basically want to share my experience with almost legal chip and pin fraud.

Basically I went in to a club/bar one night in London and put my pin in to pay for a 29£ round of drinks (2 Sex on the Beach and 1 vodka and coke) - that was expensive enough I thought when I received the receipt.. but upon checking my statements later I found out that the club withdrew 290£ out of my account!

Hence im in the process now of trying to somehow claim that money back.

My first port of call was to phone my bank (queries department) who performed a check of what the transaction was and all the could give me was 'verified by pin' indicating that I was aware of the quantity etc... and nothing to do with them..

Feeling a bit cheesed off I did some research on the net and it turns out that retailers can STILL access your details without you being present and ammend the amount they charge you...

 

Here's a couple cases :

 

The Devil's Kitchen: ChipPin' away at fraud

 

Money - Times Online - WBLG: Hidden danger of chip and pin

 

In both of these cases the retailer changed the final bill without the approval or knowledge of the consumer..

SO thats a big warning to you all out there to check your statements and keep your receipts...

Usually I keep mine but I can't find the receipt from the night out so I'm in the process now of trying to obtain one from the club itself... who are proving to be extremely elusive.. and even if they did give a receipt I think it is hard for me to prove that all I bought was 3 measly drinks...

If I dont get a receipt from the club I'll get through to the fraud department of my bank but again I doubt if they'll be too willing to help out :(

I'll try and update you all if there is any progress, hopefully someone out there might have some advice for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately its still happening.

Theres 2 card issuers that WILL refund....but the rest still wont. was featured on TVs watchdog programme recently

 

type in watchdog in your search and click on finances (reports)

you will get the story it was called chip and pin.

Good luck

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't a Chip & PIN problem ,you would have been in exactly the same situation if you had a swipe card. The problem remains, in the confusion at hte bar, did you actuall notice the debit amount? It may have been entered as £290 at the terminal, and you OKd it. In this case, the issue is not with the bank which simply followed your instructions, but the bar, who took the wrong amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The receipt I had at the time was for £29 showing exactly how much i paid for each item, unfortunately I lost this receipt =(

What I shall try to obtain from the bar is an itemised bill to see how much i was paying for each item.

 

According a HSBC senior person :

 

Up to 40 minutes after any chip&pin/card transaction, the retailer may access your confidential details and submit any number of further transactions (or cancel the original and submit a new transaction) without your presence or consent. This is perfectly legal practice. The onus is then on the customer to challenge these subsequent transactions with their bank, once the customer actually becomes aware of them

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, the receipt is immaterial surely? As for the merchant having 40 minutes to submit additional unauthorised transactions, I've not been able to find this in HSBCs Merchant Rules for card transactions - perhaps they would care to provide documentary proof? (Mind you, Car Rental firms seem to get a free hand to debit again long after the vehicle is returned).

 

It really beggars belief!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way forward. Tell you card issuer again and ask them for a disputed transaction form.

 

You say you did receive a receipt for £29 that you no longer have, well there still should be an auditable trail and your card issuer should be able to trace this.

 

If it were a credit card you used, then consider changing it to Chip & Signature - at least you'd have a receipt AND so would the bar.

 

(By the way your not the first to be overcharged due to PIN use).

 

This is Money wanted to fight cases of PIN based fraud on the victims behalf, but I can't find the link - sorry.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hey I'm currently trying to get my money back from a bar in London aswell (maybe the same 1?), i got double charged for an already expensive meal. I made the initial payment on a chip an pin machine, but after checking the amount and entering my pin they realized their was no receipt paper left in it. An acting manager came over with another chip n pin machine and ensured me the previous one wouldn't have processed the payment.

 

One week later and I have two identical charges on my statement....

they keep giving me broken promises now about reimbursing the money back to my account now. My bank can't do anything because it was on debit card/ What was the bar you were at? Was it the No1 leicester Square.?.. because they have been very unprofessional with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another benefit of Chip & Signature - I saw one customer in front of me at a hotel being asked AFTER he entered his PIN (and it was accepted) that due to the paper receipt not working, the card was swiped and a paper receipt printed out for his signature. I warned him this would be viewed as 2 transactions and he didn't believe me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

According a HSBC senior person :

 

Up to 40 minutes after any chip&pin/card transaction, the retailer may access your confidential details and submit any number of further transactions (or cancel the original and submit a new transaction) without your presence or consent. This is perfectly legal practice. The onus is then on the customer to challenge these subsequent transactions with their bank, once the customer actually becomes aware of them

How can this possibly be legal practice. Surely its theft or fraud? In addition to sheer stupidity on the part of the banks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly another ' mistaken' senior person? The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) have got it wrong many times before. I'be looked at the rules for card merchants and cannot see where this waiver exists - so as for it being acceptable/legal, I very much doubt it. Not only this, I cannot find such a waiver provided as part of the C&P rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Another benefit of Chip & Signature - I saw one customer in front of me at a hotel being asked AFTER he entered his PIN (and it was accepted) that due to the paper receipt not working, the card was swiped and a paper receipt printed out for his signature. I warned him this would be viewed as 2 transactions and he didn't believe me!

 

As a Chip & Signature Card Holder Buzby, You don't have a PIN and are never prompted to enter one. Counter staff are informed to remove your card and check your signature.

 

Things about PIN's if the card industry hard and software can't keep PINs secret.

 

A miniaturised interceptor inserted inside the terminal copies the information on the card's magnetic strip and picks up the pin.

 

Mr Harris said: "Any retail outlet that has a chip-and-pin terminal is vulnerable, perhaps a corner shop or takeaway food premises."

 

Then how can they hold victims of PIN based fraud liable by accusing them of being negligent with their PIN?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I most certainly don't have a PIN, but the cardholder in front of me did, and was expected to comply by providing a PIN AND signature - why cardholders are not advised of this further abuse to their rights eludes me.

 

Actually at Shell auto-pay pumps, with no PIN, the fuel is dispensed without any formality!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Likewise the fact that anyone who sees you enter your PIN in a shop could then steal your card (possibly by violent means), then proceed to take money from your account at a cashpoint.

 

It might be difficult for some people, but perhaps there should be the facility to use different PINs for shopping and cash machines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only positive thing about Pay at The Pump (No PIN or Signature Required) is that if there is any fraud, the retailer coughs up, they take the hit and think this is acceptable.

 

Remember the Chip & PIN people saying you couldn'nt use cloned cards and PINs in UK ATM's anymore, and that all the cloned cards and PINs were being used overseas?

 

CCTV shows the cashpoint thief who plundered £10,000 in just two hours using 49 cloned credit cards

 

 

Article click here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed - but add to this none of the P@P or indeed Bank ATMS read the chip at all! And the banks are now looking at NO-CHIP cards (well, RFID) but you know what I mean, which to my mind is even less secure than the original chip!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buzby, concur contactless cards are a crooks dream.

 

Just picked this up from the Irish Independent:

 

"

At the time that 'chip and pin' technology was introduced, it was spun by the banks as a great fraud buster and an example of their technological investment in protecting clients' cash.

The real purpose of the technology was to shift financial responsibility for security lapses from the banks' balance sheet and on to the customer. "

 

Article click here.

 

Slightly off topic but Nationwide aren't the only ones who misplace laptops:

 

Bank of Ireland do too.

 

Story click here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...