Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Still shaking ... Mackenzie Hall - have a committed a criminal offence?


tiglet
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5808 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

My mum received a letter yesterday from a company called Mackenzie Hall, chasing a debt (again, it was a student one and, again, i honestly can't remember 10 years back as to whether I paid it or not - see ECI posts).

 

I telephoned this morning and spoke to a nutcase called Laura. I asked when the debt was from and she stated it was for a store card taken out 10 1997, which was sold to Cabot in 2002 and they were representing cabot. Half-way through the conversation, she then said that MH owned the debt - i queried this and se said "We are acting on behalf or Cabot so Mackenzie Hall own the debt". I'm a tad confused about this.

 

I then informed her this meant the debt was statute barred - no, she said, because Cabot didn't buy the debt until 2002. I told her that this had nothing to do with it and that it was whether contact/payment had been made within 6 years. She then started yelling at me, telling me that as I hadn't given a forwarding address, i had committed a criminal offence! She said lots of letters had been sent to my Mum's address (they haven't, or my Mum would definitely have passed them on, as she did this one). She then said statute barred only meant that they couldn't pursue me through the courts, but that they would still pursue me. I then started telling her about the OFT guidelines on harrasssment, she started shouting even more and put the phone down!

 

I am gobsmacked! I don't understand this thing about committing a criminal offence? i was going to send them the standard statute barred letter, but I don't really wnat them to know my home address now. However, if they're right and I've committed a crime, i don't want the police turning up at my Mum's doorstep - i'd rather walk into the police station myself.

 

Help????? Please???? Quickly??? Really starting to panic here.

 

Thanks in advance.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have not committed a crime.

 

Do not speak to these people. Send a CCA 1974 request for agreement.

 

Give them your present address referring to your mothers address, include the phrase "I do not acknowledge this alleged debt", also state that no correspondence will be entered into, until the requested document is produced.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a pity you answered these [edited] at all. I know its easy to say but you should have put the phone down. Then composed yourself and if you answered again inform the Lovely Laura that her call was being recorded.

 

You have NOT committed a criminal offence. [edited].

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much.

 

i'm afraid the PDf link doesn't seemt o be linking to anything - could you let me knwo where to find it?

 

Thanks

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one should ever call a debt collector. They will lie and bully and do almost anything to get their hands on your money.

 

The only true thing told to you was that a statute barred debt can be chased but cannot be enforced through the courts. This nugget of information is important because you can now see where MHall are coming from.

 

You could send them the Statute Barred letter - find a template in the stichys or send them the CCA letter. Whichever send it recorded and wait for the reply. In many instances they never respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nailpost - do think it would be worthwhile phoning east ayrshire trading standarsd? this woman really scared m into thinking the police were going to get involved.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so should i send the CCa request, statute barred letter or both?

 

thanks for help/support guys - I only contacted them because they sen a ltter to my mum, as i've said, and as she's a widow with cancer, I really didn't wnat her to get debt collectors turning up at the door or anything like that.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request, don't get into statute barred until you have a copy agreement, which you probably wont get.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. i'll do that today.

 

I still can't believe Loony Laura told me I had committed a criminal offence by not providing ... well, i don't know who, with a forwarding address. surely the fact their letter got through shows I can still receive post from that address?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a DCA chasing me for a debt that was over ten years old, I never ever responded to their letters, eventually I wrote to them under the Freedom of Information Act, asking for all the info they held for me, reply;

 

Mr X XXXXXXX a/c XXXXXXX £XXXXX

 

That was it.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about premenstrual psycopath? (yes, mods, i'm joking too and as a woman, I'm legally entitled to comment on ovulation);)

 

Thanks, that made me smile

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just phoned my mum and got her to dictate the letter received from MH to me over the phone, it goes as follows:

 

22/02/07

Ref: xxxxxxx

Pursuers Cabot Financial Group £xxxx

This letter is sent by the way of introduction to Mackenzie Hall Ltd who have been instructed by the Cabot Financial Group, being the owner of the above account to pursue you for payment in full. This communication is an attempt to collect the payment in full without the need for further action. Our client’s records show that you are contractually responsible for payment of all monies due.

The agreement dated and regulated under the terms of the Consumer Credit act 1974 went into default and subsequently charged off by the original lender. As a result of that default, the total balance outstanding at today’s date amounts to £xxx inclusive of all interest accrued in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

Accordingly, Cabot Financial as the legal owner of the balance due is entitled to immediate payment of that amount from you. Your payment must be made payable to Mackenzie Hall, quoting reference xxxx.

If you dispute the validity of all or any part of this debt, you must notify Mackenzie Hall in writing providing full details of the reason for your dispute within 7 days of the date of this letter. Should you wish to discuss payment, please telephone xxxxxxx

If we do not hear from you within 7 days, further action will be taken in respect of the full outstanding balance. If however, you are not the person named above or have information regarding the person’s possible whereabouts, then please contact our investigation team in confidence or the alternative telephone number or email address below:

[email protected]

Jerry Shaw, Account Manager

Mackenzie Hall may record telephone calls etc, etc, etc …

 

 

This seems to me as if they ahve the original agreement, so would I not simply be better advising them it is statute barred?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be Jerry with a G. Has he learned to write yet because every letter I've seen from him has been signed by a computer.

 

Send the CCA letter to MHall today and mark off your calendar. Then when they default tell to get stuffed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, let them send you a copy. Providing that you have not made any payment in the last six years, or corresponded with them, then you can dispute it as time barred.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just phoned my mum and got her to dictate the letter received from MH to me over the phone, it goes as follows:

 

22/02/07

 

Ref: xxxxxxx

 

Pursuers Cabot Financial Group £xxxx

 

This letter is sent by the way of introduction to Mackenzie Hall Ltd who have been instructed by the Cabot Financial Group, being the owner of the above account to pursue you for payment in full. This communication is an attempt to collect the payment in full without the need for further action. Our client’s records show that you are contractually responsible for payment of all monies due.

 

The agreement dated and regulated under the terms of the Consumer Credit act 1974 went into default and subsequently charged off by the original lender. As a result of that default, the total balance outstanding at today’s date amounts to £xxx inclusive of all interest accrued in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

 

Accordingly, Cabot Financial as the legal owner of the balance due is entitled to immediate payment of that amount from you. Your payment must be made payable to Mackenzie Hall, quoting reference xxxx.

 

If you dispute the validity of all or any part of this debt, you must notify Mackenzie Hall in writing providing full details of the reason for your dispute within 7 days of the date of this letter. Should you wish to discuss payment, please telephone xxxxxxx

 

If we do not hear from you within 7 days, further action will be taken in respect of the full outstanding balance. If however, you are not the person named above or have information regarding the person’s possible whereabouts, then please contact our investigation team in confidence or the alternative telephone number or email address below:

 

[email protected]

 

Jerry Shaw, Account Manager

 

Mackenzie Hall may record telephone calls etc, etc, etc …

 

 

This seems to me as if they ahve the original agreement, so would I not simply be better advising them it is statute barred?

Im no expert but surely the letter is in itself illegal ''If however, you are not the person named above or have information regarding the person’s possible whereabouts, then please contact our investigation team in confidence or the alternative telephone number or email address below:''

They have discussed an alleged debt and they are not even sure if they have sent it to the right person. Surely that cannot be right. I suspect rcollins email inbox will be rather full tonight. To me it seems as if its their standard scare letter:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

[EDIT]

 

Nice, but I wouldn't have posted that.:lol:

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really couldn't condone such behaviour after the thoroughly professional approach they have taken with me.

 

I've decided to send the statute barred letter, then if they decide to keep on playing silly buggers after that, it's Trading Standards and a CCA.

 

I think I'll email their trade body as well - oh, how I wish I had recorded their call!

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really couldn't condone such behaviour after the thoroughly professional approach they have taken with me.

 

I've decided to send the statute barred letter, then if they decide to keep on playing silly buggers after that, it's Trading Standards and a CCA.

 

I think I'll email their trade body as well - oh, how I wish I had recorded their call!

 

Its your choice, however I would advise the CCA first, if you send the statute barred, you could get into silly dialogue with them, disputing your assertion.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...